AuditBoard vs Black Kite comparison

AuditBoard and Black Kite are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. AuditBoard is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Black Kite is ranked #8. AuditBoard holds a 5.7% mindshare in IVRM, compared to Black Kite’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

2,234 Views
1,117 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Black Kite

Read 1 Black Kite review

948 Views
948 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Black Kite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AuditBoard and Black Kite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SecurityScorecard, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Vendor Risk Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (5th)

Black Kite

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

8th

Average Rating

3.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Black Kite is 3.6%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AuditBoard	5.7%
Black Kite	3.6%
Other	90.7%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2562750

Vice President at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Streamlined workflow and enhanced simplicity with an easy setup

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look at risks and controls The collaboration within my team had not yet significantly changed since…

Read full review

Julian Shen

VP at FUbon

Solution with improvements needed in patch management, security view and scorecard

Black Kite is a good visual tool. It uses colors, such as black, to indicate emergencies. Other colors like red, green, and yellow, are pretty and good to look at The solution’s patch management should be improved. Also, the overall security view and scorecard have remained unchanged over the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are lots of features."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

More AuditBoard pros

"Black Kite is a good visual tool."

Cons

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

More AuditBoard cons

"The solution’s patch management should be improved. The overall security view and scorecard have remained unchanged over the past three years. There's no technical support available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is recommended for smaller companies, particularly for its risk assessment module, which is simple and easy to use. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Scytale vs AuditBoard

Compared 15% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 12% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

MetricStream vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 5% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

SecurityScorecard vs Black Kite

Compared 29% of the time

Bitsight vs Black Kite

Compared 20% of the time

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs Black Kite

Compared 14% of the time

RiskRecon vs Black Kite

Compared 10% of the time

More Black Kite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

March 2026

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Vendor Risk Management

February 2026

Download Black Kite product report

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Black Kite provides a comprehensive cyber risk assessment framework for enterprises seeking to proactively manage and mitigate security threats.

Through an extensive understanding of risk analytics, Black Kite offers detailed visibility into third-party risk, assisting organizations in identifying potential vulnerabilities before they manifest. As an instrumental tool in cybersecurity strategies, Black Kite stands out by delivering actionable intelligence and informed risk assessments that enhance security measures across business operations.

What features make Black Kite valuable?

Risk Intelligence: Offers nuanced insights into third-party risk levels.
In-depth Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics tailored to organizational requirements.
Automated Monitoring: Continuously tracks vulnerabilities in real-time.
Vendor Analysis: Evaluates the cybersecurity posture of business partners.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens defenses against cyber threats.
Better Decision-Making: Supports more informed business choices.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with risk management.
Reputation Protection: Safeguards brand reputation through proactive risk mitigation.

Black Kite is implemented in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail where cyber threats demand an immediate response. With an emphasis on security posture and incident prevention, Black Kite adapts its functionality to meet specific industry challenges, ensuring relevance and efficiency in different sectors.

Black Kite

Buyer's Guide

IT Vendor Risk Management

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SecurityScorecard, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.