Black Kite vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Read 7 SecurityScorecard reviews

1,739 Views
1,001 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Black Kite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Black Kite and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OneTrust, RSA, SecurityScorecard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: February 2025).

IT Vendor Risk Management

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Black Kite

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

11th

Average Rating

3.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SecurityScorecard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Black Kite is 6.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityScorecard is 11.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Julian Shen

VP at FUbon

Solution with improvements needed in patch management, security view and scorecard

Black Kite is a good visual tool. It uses colors, such as black, to indicate emergencies. Other colors like red, green, and yellow, are pretty and good to look at The solution’s patch management should be improved. Also, the overall security view and scorecard have remained unchanged over the…

Read full review

Hadar Eshel

Co-Founder and CEO at Cloudway

Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services

Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Black Kite is a good visual tool."

"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."

"The initial setup takes just a couple of days and doesn't require any installation."

"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

"Fortify Data offers attack surface capabilities that identify vulnerabilities, exposed ports, and dark web information."

"The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats."

"With SecurityScorecard, the most valuable feature is the ability to identify if third parties or vendors have digital threats that may impact our company. It also scans all internal domains and IPs to find vulnerabilities in the digital landscape. The continuous monitoring capabilities have been beneficial by providing ongoing assessments of potential risks."

"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."

"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."

Cons

"The solution’s patch management should be improved. The overall security view and scorecard have remained unchanged over the past three years. There's no technical support available."

"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."

"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."

"The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data."

"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."

"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."

"The pricing of the product needs improvement in Brazil."

"Some wanted a different solution."

"There are areas for improvement in response times and overall support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."

"Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

"The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high taxes, making it more expensive. Selling SecurityScorecard or any American vendor's product in the United States is very different from selling in South America or Brazil."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Black Kite?

Black Kite is a good visual tool.

What needs improvement with Black Kite?

The solution’s patch management should be improved. Also, the overall security view and scorecard have remained unchanged over the past three years. There should be some changes.

What advice do you have for others considering Black Kite?

I would not recommend using Black Kite right now. We are planning to switch from the product. Overall, I rate it a three out of ten.

What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?

One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?

SecurityScorecard is priced in the middle range. There are more expensive and cheaper options available, however, Fortify Data and Censinet are also in the same middle range.

What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?

The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data. Adding more features to combine and consolidate internal vulnerability sc...

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs Black Kite

Comparisons

Bitsight vs Black Kite

Compared 26% of the time

Compared 14% of the time

RiskRecon vs Black Kite

Compared 11% of the time

Panorays vs Black Kite

Compared 6% of the time

More Black Kite Competitors

Bitsight vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 28% of the time

RiskRecon vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 19% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 7% of the time

Recorded Future vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 7% of the time

More SecurityScorecard Competitors

Product Reports

IT Vendor Risk Management

February 2025

Download Black Kite product report

Download SecurityScorecard product report

January 2025

Overview

Black Kite provides a comprehensive cyber risk assessment framework for enterprises seeking to proactively manage and mitigate security threats.

Through an extensive understanding of risk analytics, Black Kite offers detailed visibility into third-party risk, assisting organizations in identifying potential vulnerabilities before they manifest. As an instrumental tool in cybersecurity strategies, Black Kite stands out by delivering actionable intelligence and informed risk assessments that enhance security measures across business operations.

What features make Black Kite valuable?

Risk Intelligence: Offers nuanced insights into third-party risk levels.
In-depth Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics tailored to organizational requirements.
Automated Monitoring: Continuously tracks vulnerabilities in real-time.
Vendor Analysis: Evaluates the cybersecurity posture of business partners.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens defenses against cyber threats.
Better Decision-Making: Supports more informed business choices.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with risk management.
Reputation Protection: Safeguards brand reputation through proactive risk mitigation.

Black Kite is implemented in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail where cyber threats demand an immediate response. With an emphasis on security posture and incident prevention, Black Kite adapts its functionality to meet specific industry challenges, ensuring relevance and efficiency in different sectors.

Black Kite

Funded by world-class investors including Evolution Equity Partners, Silver Lake Partners, Sequoia Capital, GV, Riverwood Capital, and others, SecurityScorecard is the global leader in cybersecurity ratings with more than 12 million companies continuously rated. Founded in 2013 by security and risk experts Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy and Sam Kassoumeh, SecurityScorecard’s patented rating technology is used by over 25,000 organizations for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, board reporting, due diligence, cyber insurance underwriting, and regulatory oversight. SecurityScorecard continues to make the world a safer place by transforming the way companies understand, improve and communicate cybersecurity risk to their boards, employees and vendors. Every organization has the universal right to their trusted and transparent Instant SecurityScorecard rating. For more information, visit securityscorecard.com or connect with us on LinkedIn.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial