Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SecurityScorecard vs Tenable Nessus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Tenable Nessus enhances security and threat management, improving visibility and preventing costly attacks, though ROI quantification is challenging.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Tenable Nessus customer service is responsive and effective, though complex issues occasionally face delays; overall satisfaction is high.
Whenever any issue arises, we contact the support, and they are always there for us.
The technical support is good yet could improve in terms of response time.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Tenable Nessus is scalable and adaptable, although large enterprises may face challenges with extensive data and cloud limitations.
Whether managing 50 servers today or 500 tomorrow, performance or capacity are not hindered.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Users rate SecurityScorecard as highly reliable, 99.99% stable, with minimal issues and smooth operation reported.
Sentiment score
8.1
Users praise Tenable Nessus's stability and reliability, with minimal issues that are easily resolved, making it highly dependable.
We have not encountered any issues with missing network items or errors in API and webhook interactions.
 

Room For Improvement

Tenable Nessus users seek improved reporting, UI, integration, vulnerability accuracy, and expanded coverage with better management, customization, and pricing.
The documentation is not well-organized, which can be confusing when searching for solutions or specific information related to Tenable Nessus Professional.
 

Setup Cost

Tenable Nessus offers competitive pricing, appealing to smaller organizations, with pricing from $2,000 to $6,000 and no hidden fees.
Tenable Nessus's pricing is adequate if it is fully utilized.
 

Valuable Features

Tenable Nessus excels in comprehensive vulnerability management with automation, ease of integration, and cost-effective, customizable solutions.
The scanning and reporting features are the most valuable aspects of Tenable Nessus.
The features I personally like include host discovery.
 

Categories and Ranking

SecurityScorecard
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)
Tenable Nessus
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. SecurityScorecard is designed for IT Vendor Risk Management and holds a mindshare of 11.8%, up 11.1% compared to last year.
Tenable Nessus, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 12.6% mindshare, down 15.3% since last year.
IT Vendor Risk Management
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Hadar Eshel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services
Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.
Matthew Weisler - PeerSpot reviewer
Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results
The solution has a single price for unlimited assets. Value wise, the solution is also great for pen testers and consultants. The solution is useful for vulnerability and patch management from both the internal and public facing sides. Quick assessments, compliance scores, and results are provided without having to do agents.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high tax...
What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
The pricing of the product needs improvement in Brazil.
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What do you like most about Tenable Nessus?
We have around 500 virtual machines. Therefore, we conduct monthly scans and open tickets for our developers to address identified vulnerabilities. These scans cover the servers, other network equi...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
Bitbrains, Tesla, Just Eat, Crosskey Banking Solutions, Covenant Health, Youngstown State University
Find out what your peers are saying about OneTrust, RSA, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.