We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the external channel."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"It's not very user-friendly at times and requires in-depth understanding. So, a layman or someone new to Qualys won't be able to easily understand it. You need education to use the solution."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"The IoT scan is not great."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Panorays.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.