Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qualys VMDR Logo

Top 10 Qualys VMDR Alternatives

Vendor: Qualys
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
3,326 followers
Start review

Top Qualys VMDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Qualys VMDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Tenable Nessus, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Qualys VMDR surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive vulnerability management, rapid threat detection, integrated patch management, and immediate response capabilities through a single platform, providing enhanced security and efficiency for organizations.

Qualys Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Qualys, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Qualys VMDR Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management with extensive reporting but faces criticism for user complexity and pricing. In comparison, Wiz offers automated cloud vulnerability analysis and easier deployment despite challenges in reporting and scanning, making it appealing for cloud-focused enterprises.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Wiz Report
Qualys VMDR typically has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, whereas Wiz offers a more budget-friendly initial setup cost. The main difference lies in the pricing, with Qualys being more expensive upfront compared to Wiz.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR typically has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, whereas Wiz offers a more budget-friendly initial setup cost. The main difference lies in the pricing, with Qualys being more expensive upfront compared to Wiz.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive vulnerability management with advanced features, making it suitable for larger enterprises seeking a complete solution. In comparison, Tenable Nessus provides affordability and ease of use, appealing to smaller organizations or those with budget constraints.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Qualys VMDR usually has a lower initial setup cost, while Tenable Nessus often requires higher upfront investment. This cost difference can significantly impact budget allocation strategies for companies considering these vulnerability management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR usually has a lower initial setup cost, while Tenable Nessus often requires higher upfront investment. This cost difference can significantly impact budget allocation strategies for companies considering these vulnerability management solutions.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.4 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management and offers extensive policy compliance, appealing to those prioritizing asset protection. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides real-time AI threat detection and broad security integration, suiting buyers seeking adaptive, minimal-intervention solutions.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Qualys VMDR offers a low setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a low setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security requires a higher initial investment.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management and cloud convenience, making it ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Tanium's strength lies in endpoint management and threat intelligence, appealing to those prioritizing threat protection and real-time monitoring capabilities, despite its higher pricing considerations.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tanium Report
Qualys VMDR offers a low setup cost, while Tanium may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a low setup cost, while Tanium may involve higher initial expenses.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels with vulnerability management and seamless updates, ideal for comprehensive security. In comparison, Tenable Security Center emphasizes robust vulnerability scanning with strategic risk management priorities. Both offer significant ROI, but Tenable may be more cost-effective for larger enterprises.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Qualys VMDR typically has lower setup costs, providing cost efficiency for smaller teams, while Tenable Security Center may involve higher initial investments, accommodating more extensive networks and larger enterprise needs, emphasizing distinctions in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR typically has lower setup costs, providing cost efficiency for smaller teams, while Tenable Security Center may involve higher initial investments, accommodating more extensive networks and larger enterprise needs, emphasizing distinctions in their pricing structures.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management with automation and continuous monitoring, suited for various deployment environments. In comparison, Tenable offers detailed asset visibility and diverse environment support with strong network scanning, appealing to enterprises but needs more SMB customization.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management involves a more complex setup that may incur higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Tenable Vulnerability Management involves a more complex setup that may incur higher costs.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability management with comprehensive asset management and intuitive dashboards, ideal for those seeking a thorough on-premises or hybrid solution. In comparison, Orca Security's agentless deployment offers standout cloud-native application protection and container security, benefiting cloud-focused operations seeking ease of deployment.
Download Orca Security vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a complex setup cost structure, while Orca Security provides a simplified, straightforward setup fee, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment and onboarding approach between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a complex setup cost structure, while Orca Security provides a simplified, straightforward setup fee, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment and onboarding approach between the two security solutions.
Qualys VMDR Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in comprehensive vulnerability assessment and efficient management. In comparison, JFrog Xray integrates security within the software development lifecycle and aligns with DevOps needs. Each offers unique benefits: Qualys for cost-effective vulnerability management, JFrog for enhanced software security.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup cost, while JFrog Xray has a more complex setup fee structure, highlighting a key difference in pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup cost, while JFrog Xray has a more complex setup fee structure, highlighting a key difference in pricing approach.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Acunetix
3.9 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in comprehensive vulnerability and asset management, attracting those prioritizing compliance. In comparison, Acunetix focuses on automated web vulnerability scanning, making it ideal for detecting security flaws across web applications. Qualys targets broader management, while Acunetix specializes in web application security.
Download Acunetix vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR is noted for a cost-effective setup, whereas Acunetix requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR is noted for a cost-effective setup, whereas Acunetix requires a higher initial investment.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Claroty Platform
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR appeals to IT environments with its extensive vulnerability management and user-friendly interface. In comparison, Claroty Platform specializes in OT security, providing robust protection for industrial systems. Qualys offers flexible deployment, while Claroty focuses on securing operational technology.
Download Claroty Platform vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Claroty Platform involves higher setup costs due to its complex integration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Claroty Platform involves higher setup costs due to its complex integration requirements.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers robust vulnerability management with features like asset tagging and continuous monitoring. In contrast, Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP focuses on cloud-specific security with identity protection and auto-remediation. Qualys suits diverse cloud environments, while CloudGuard fits primarily public cloud deployments.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a cost-effective setup, while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP involves higher initial costs due to its advanced features and enhanced support.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a cost-effective setup, while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP involves higher initial costs due to its advanced features and enhanced support.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels with a vast vulnerability database and prebuilt templates, catering to integration needs. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP specializes in anomaly detection and streamlined compliance workflows, appealing to those requiring simpler integration and cloud security.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a pricing distinction in setup costs between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a pricing distinction in setup costs between the two solutions.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Skybox Security Suite
3.8 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers robust vulnerability management and scalability via cloud solutions, appealing to organizations needing continuous monitoring and asset management. In comparison, Skybox Security Suite provides extensive network modeling and simulation, suitable for complex environments with stringent compliance requirements.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Skybox Security Suite Report
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup process, while Skybox Security Suite presents higher initial costs. Qualys VMDR appeals with its lower setup costs, contrasting Skybox's more complex and costly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup process, while Skybox Security Suite presents higher initial costs. Qualys VMDR appeals with its lower setup costs, contrasting Skybox's more complex and costly implementation.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR stands out with its asset discovery and monitoring, appealing to those seeking detailed insights. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management offers seamless integration with Windows, ideal for organizations leveraging Microsoft's native threat response capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which requires more initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which requires more initial investment.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in comprehensive vulnerability management with robust scanning and compliance capabilities. In comparison, Trend Vision One - Cloud Security focuses on multi-cloud integration and advanced threat detection. Both solutions differ in pricing strategies and deployment options, appealing to varied tech buyer needs.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Qualys VMDR has lower setup costs compared to Trend Vision One - Cloud Security, making it a more cost-effective choice initially. Trend Vision One, however, could entail higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has lower setup costs compared to Trend Vision One - Cloud Security, making it a more cost-effective choice initially. Trend Vision One, however, could entail higher initial expenses.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.9 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Rapid7 Metasploit
3.9 out of 5
Qualys VMDR emphasizes continuous monitoring and asset management with threat intelligence integration. In comparison, Rapid7 Metasploit excels in penetration testing and exploitation with numerous payloads and modules. Qualys suits comprehensive vulnerability needs, whereas Metasploit benefits targeted attack simulation enthusiasts.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report
Qualys VMDR requires a significant initial investment, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit offers a cost-effective setup, highlighting a clear difference in their upfront cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR requires a significant initial investment, whereas Rapid7 Metasploit offers a cost-effective setup, highlighting a clear difference in their upfront cost structures.
Qualys VMDR Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
XM Cyber
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR is appealing for its cost-effective, integrated vulnerability management, whereas XM Cyber provides advanced threat simulation for deeper insights. In comparison, Qualys offers easier cloud-based deployment, while XM Cyber requires more setup effort. Both deliver ROI through distinct security-enhancing features.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. XM Cyber Report
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost compared to XM Cyber, which is more affordable, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost compared to XM Cyber, which is more affordable, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in thorough vulnerability assessments for businesses needing in-depth security insights. In comparison, Automox's ease and efficiency in patch management and deployment attract those prioritizing streamlined IT operations and cost-effective solutions over extensive security measures.
Download Automox vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR requires a more complex setup cost, while Automox offers a simpler initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR requires a more complex setup cost, while Automox offers a simpler initial configuration.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
The NodeZero Platform
2.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR attracts tech buyers with its all-in-one vulnerability management and response, benefiting from competitive pricing and strong ROI. In comparison, NodeZero Platform offers advanced automation for proactive threat prevention, appealing to those requiring dynamic and real-time security adaptability despite a higher initial cost.
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to The NodeZero Platform, which may appeal to budget-conscious organizations. The NodeZero Platform, however, provides advanced features justifying its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to The NodeZero Platform, which may appeal to budget-conscious organizations. The NodeZero Platform, however, provides advanced features justifying its higher setup cost.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Nucleus
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR is chosen for its comprehensive features, including automated threat detection and detailed reporting. In comparison, Nucleus excels in ease of use with robust integration capabilities. Tech buyers might prefer Qualys VMDR for depth or Nucleus for integration flexibility.
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Nucleus involves a more comprehensive setup process that may incur higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Nucleus involves a more comprehensive setup process that may incur higher expenses.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Identity
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR's strength lies in vulnerability management and automated reporting, ideal for medium to large enterprises seeking cloud-based solutions. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Identity offers robust threat detection, dynamic incident response, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those prioritizing real-time protection and budget-friendliness.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Identity Report
Qualys VMDR has a more cost-effective setup process, while SentinelOne Singularity Identity tends to have higher initial setup costs, highlighting a key financial difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a more cost-effective setup process, while SentinelOne Singularity Identity tends to have higher initial setup costs, highlighting a key financial difference.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in comprehensive vulnerability management and seamless cloud integration, making it ideal for robust endpoint monitoring. In comparison, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition delivers extensive web application security testing, appealing to organizations focused on active scanning and network modification capabilities.
Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers straightforward setup with minimal costs, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition involves more significant initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers straightforward setup with minimal costs, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition involves more significant initial expenses.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Fortra's Alert Logic MDR
4.0 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in automated vulnerability management and comprehensive cloud capabilities. In comparison, Fortra's Alert Logic MDR specializes in real-time threat detection with rapid human response. Qualys offers detailed reporting, while Alert Logic provides cost-efficient incident management through its technology platform.
Download Fortra's Alert Logic MDR vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR has a competitive setup cost, whereas Fortra's Alert Logic MDR is more expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a competitive setup cost, whereas Fortra's Alert Logic MDR is more expensive.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk
4.3 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels with its integrated vulnerability management and automated workflows for streamlined threat response. In comparison, Arctic Wolf Managed Risk focuses on proactive risk management with continuous monitoring, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive security oversight and customized collaboration for complex needs.
Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a more transparent setup cost, whereas Arctic Wolf Managed Risk includes setup within a broader service package, highlighting a key difference in their approach to pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a more transparent setup cost, whereas Arctic Wolf Managed Risk includes setup within a broader service package, highlighting a key difference in their approach to pricing structures.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
4.7 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in automation and integration, ideal for large-scale, cloud-centric environments. In comparison, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus attracts cost-sensitive enterprises with its competitive pricing and flexible on-premises deployment, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations prioritizing extensive reporting and risk assessment.
Download ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR's setup cost tends to be higher compared to ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, which is often considered more budget-friendly. This price difference is a significant factor for organizations evaluating their vulnerability management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR's setup cost tends to be higher compared to ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, which is often considered more budget-friendly. This price difference is a significant factor for organizations evaluating their vulnerability management solutions.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform
4.8 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in analytics and asset management integration, aiding in immediate threat identification. In comparison, SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform's competitive pricing and comprehensive endpoint management, including automated patch deployment, offer a holistic security approach that appeals to tech buyers seeking cost-efficient solutions.
Download Qualys VMDR vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost compared to SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform, making SanerNow a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a higher setup cost compared to SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform, making SanerNow a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment
3.3 out of 5
Qualys VMDR provides extensive features for proactive management and detection. In comparison, IBM Guardium offers robust data protection focused on sensitive data management. Buyers seeking broad vulnerability capabilities may favor Qualys, while those prioritizing data security might choose IBM Guardium.
Download IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR incurs a setup cost that is straightforward and transparent, whereas IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment presents a higher initial expense with a more complex implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR incurs a setup cost that is straightforward and transparent, whereas IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment presents a higher initial expense with a more complex implementation process.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR appeals to cost-sensitive buyers with its efficient pricing and automated detection, while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM attracts those seeking advanced predictive analytics and seamless integration. In comparison, Ivanti excels in innovative threat management, contrasting with Qualys's straightforward cost-effectiveness.
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Neurons for RBVM, which may appeal to budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient vulnerability management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Neurons for RBVM, which may appeal to budget-conscious organizations seeking efficient vulnerability management solutions.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Balbix BreachControl
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR is favored for competitive pricing and efficient support with an emphasis on automation, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Balbix BreachControl offers predictive intelligence and personalized deployment, ideal for those seeking advanced risk management despite higher costs.
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while Balbix BreachControl exhibits a more flexible pricing model. Balbix may offer a tailored approach, contrasting with Qualys’ more defined cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while Balbix BreachControl exhibits a more flexible pricing model. Balbix may offer a tailored approach, contrasting with Qualys’ more defined cost structure.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
SecureWorks Taegis VDR
4.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive security coverage and asset management clarity. In comparison, SecureWorks Taegis VDR excels in detection capabilities and integration flexibility. Buyers may choose Qualys for efficient cost management or SecureWorks for advanced threat response and adaptability despite higher pricing.
Qualys VMDR offers straightforward setup costs with transparent pricing, while SecureWorks Taegis VDR typically incurs higher setup expenses, which may reflect its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers straightforward setup costs with transparent pricing, while SecureWorks Taegis VDR typically incurs higher setup expenses, which may reflect its advanced features.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
Greenbone
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in integrated security management and predictable costs, ideal for comprehensive infrastructure integration. In comparison, Greenbone, with its open-source flexibility and lower initial costs, appeals to organizations seeking customizable scanning with community-driven support in adaptable deployment environments.
Qualys VMDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Greenbone, highlighting a difference in their approach to market pricing. Greenbone offers a more cost-effective entry point, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Greenbone, highlighting a difference in their approach to market pricing. Greenbone offers a more cost-effective entry point, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers competitive pricing and a comprehensive suite with integrated vulnerability management. In comparison, Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager excels with advanced features and in-depth assessments, providing businesses with extensive third-party integration and a broader scope of detection capabilities.
Qualys VMDR stands out with its lower setup cost, making it more accessible, while Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager has a higher setup cost but provides an extensive feature set for comprehensive security management.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR stands out with its lower setup cost, making it more accessible, while Flexera Software Vulnerability Manager has a higher setup cost but provides an extensive feature set for comprehensive security management.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
Fortra's Vulnerability Management
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers comprehensive vulnerability coverage and advanced remediation guidance, catering to extensive security needs. In comparison, Fortra's Vulnerability Management provides cost-effective options with efficient deployment and responsive service, appealing to businesses focusing on budget constraints and quick returns.
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with transparent pricing, while Fortra's Vulnerability Management may involve higher initial setup costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a straightforward setup process with transparent pricing, while Fortra's Vulnerability Management may involve higher initial setup costs and complexity.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in extensive asset management and integration capabilities. In comparison, WithSecure Elements offers strong automation and cost-effective deployment. Tech buyers might prefer Qualys for integration or WithSecure for automation and rapid ROI.
Qualys VMDR involves a higher setup cost, contrasting with WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR involves a higher setup cost, contrasting with WithSecure Elements Vulnerability Management, which offers a more economical initial investment.
Qualys VMDR Logo
DataVisor
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR Logo
DataVisor
1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels in vulnerability and asset management, making it ideal for asset security. In comparison, DataVisor offers advanced fraud detection with machine learning, suited for fraud prevention. Relatively, Qualys provides competitive pricing, while DataVisor justifies higher costs with sophisticated features.
Qualys VMDR has upfront setup costs that may be higher, while DataVisor offers lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has upfront setup costs that may be higher, while DataVisor offers lower initial expenses.
Qualys VMDR Logo
Qualys VMDR Logo
BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management
3.5 out of 5
Qualys VMDR excels with continuous vulnerability detection and ease of cloud deployment, appealing for swift implementation and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, BMC TrueSight offers robust analytics and comprehensive management but involves complex on-premise setup, suitable for those requiring rich features despite higher costs.
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management's setup cost can be more complex and potentially higher. Both products cater to different pricing structures with varying implications on initial cost setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward setup cost, while BMC TrueSight Vulnerability Management's setup cost can be more complex and potentially higher. Both products cater to different pricing structures with varying implications on initial cost setup.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Container Security
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management