Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Recorded Future vs SecurityScorecard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Recorded Future offers valuable features like dark web monitoring, but its modular structure limits comprehensive coverage and financial returns.
Sentiment score
6.2
SecurityScorecard helps organizations identify and mitigate risks, enhancing decision-making and proactive security against digital threats and breaches.
The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Recorded Future's customer service is efficient with varying user satisfaction due to agent limitations and irrelevant information requests.
Sentiment score
5.8
SecurityScorecard's customer support is knowledgeable but slow, with resolution times of 1-3 days and satisfaction rates averaging 7/10.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
They need better organization to support their customer volume.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Recorded Future is praised for scalability and versatility, though some users have concerns about value and usage.
Sentiment score
7.0
SecurityScorecard is scalable for medium to large businesses but may not suit Fortune 500 due to scale issues.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
The product is suitable for medium to large businesses, typically with a revenue range from $200 million to a couple of billion dollars.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Recorded Future is highly reliable with a 99.7% uptime, minimal issues, and is rated nine out of ten for stability.
Sentiment score
7.8
SecurityScorecard is highly stable with a 99.99% rating; users report no issues, except minor MS Edge adjustments.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
 

Room For Improvement

Recorded Future should automate processes, simplify its system, and enhance capabilities for better threat intelligence and user experience.
Users seek improved support, better pricing, faster responses, mobile app scanning, and enhanced risk management features.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
There is a need for more active rather than passive third-party risk management features to truly mitigate risks.
 

Setup Cost

Recorded Future's high pricing, beneficial for large enterprises, poses a challenge for smaller companies due to its cost.
SecurityScorecard pricing starts at $400/month, appealing for flexibility, though international users face extra currency fees.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
There are more expensive and cheaper options available.
 

Valuable Features

Recorded Future offers customized threat intelligence, integrating diverse data and dark web insights, enhancing security solution efficacy and user experience.
SecurityScorecard enhances security with easy reporting, vendor analysis, threat monitoring, and risk assessments using threat intelligence and breach insights.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
It combines threat intel data with vulnerability information to increase risk ratings and provides insights into third-party supply chain risks.
 

Categories and Ranking

Recorded Future
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (1st), Digital Risk Protection (1st)
SecurityScorecard
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Recorded Future is designed for Threat Intelligence Platforms and holds a mindshare of 18.3%, up 18.0% compared to last year.
SecurityScorecard, on the other hand, focuses on IT Vendor Risk Management, holds 11.4% mindshare, up 10.7% since last year.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Dr. Merrick Watchorn - PeerSpot reviewer
Traceless online searches, stable, and scalable
There is a semantic oncology dynamic relationship between how the MIGR Tech framework needs more data infusion enrichment capabilities. To be clear, what the vendor is doing is of a high standard, and my only critique is that they need to make new enhancements. I am aware that the vendor is making a concerted effort to add additional information to their repository, and it is something they actively do. The vendor has publicly stated that they will work on this, and I always pay attention to make sure they adhere to that. This does not change over time. The export feature of the recording needs to stop being so restricted. When they record in order to save themselves by operations, I would expect that as a super user, if I asked to download the dataset I'm looking for, I would not be limited in my data downloads. One of the cool things is, let's say we do our entire research and we want to save all of the materials that were returned, and that special custom search that we made, we can export that into a CSV file. The problem is it gets restricted. So sometimes when I say it's restricted, we don't get all the data that we saw online. So then we have to go and manually search for the specific thing we're looking for. I would like to have the URI and whatever value set that I search off, and for the NLP package to not be stripped out. It's like saying I want to do a Pcap analysis. Don't strip out the Pcap when I asked to see Pcap. That's what they're doing. They do this for many different reasons. One of them is, imagine if everyone downloaded datasets that are very large and it brings the whole system down.
Hadar Eshel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services
Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Recorded Future?
The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?
The price of the solution is worth it. The overall performance of the solution outweighs the cost.
What needs improvement with Recorded Future?
Recorded Future depends on or relies on just the deep and dark web analysis through their quantum computing and algorithms. Sometimes, the feed is not accurate or valuable. Other threat intelligenc...
What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
SecurityScorecard is priced in the middle range. There are more expensive and cheaper options available, however, Fortify Data and Censinet are also in the same middle range.
What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data. Adding more features to combine and consolidate internal vulnerability sc...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk
TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, CrowdStrike, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: March 2025.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.