Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Recorded Future offers valuable features like dark web monitoring, but its modular structure limits comprehensive coverage and financial returns.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations improved trust, sales, and efficiency with ThreatConnect, reducing costs and response times while mitigating false positives.
We have reduced manual analyst effort by thirty to forty percent.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
This trust has led to an increase in sales because customers are confident we can protect their data.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Recorded Future's customer service is efficient with varying user satisfaction due to agent limitations and irrelevant information requests.
Sentiment score
7.5
ThreatConnect TIP's customer service is praised for expertise and responsiveness but faces time zone-related delays for users in India.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
They have been responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
I just like their customer support because, within a short period of contacting them, they are able to help navigate issues.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Recorded Future is praised for scalability and versatility, though some users have concerns about value and usage.
Sentiment score
7.4
ThreatConnect TIP ensures scalability and efficient management of data and users, supporting organizations as they grow and share information.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
ThreatConnect supports scalability by allowing us to identify threats and share information within our team networks.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Recorded Future is highly reliable with a 99.7% uptime, minimal issues, and is rated nine out of ten for stability.
Sentiment score
7.3
ThreatConnect TIP offers stable, reliable integrations with other security tools, supporting high availability, despite occasional slowdowns impacting mitigation.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Room For Improvement

Recorded Future should automate processes, simplify its system, and enhance capabilities for better threat intelligence and user experience.
ThreatConnect TIP needs integration, pricing improvements, and simplified interface with better AI and enrichment for enhanced usability and accessibility.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing is high for smaller organizations, so it would be beneficial to have tiered pricing.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Setup Cost

Recorded Future's high pricing, beneficial for large enterprises, poses a challenge for smaller companies due to its cost.
ThreatConnect is a higher-cost option, affordable for large companies but expensive for small teams, with robust capabilities.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pricing seems a bit high for smaller companies.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
Generally, the pricing and setup cost are on the higher side.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Valuable Features

Recorded Future offers customized threat intelligence, integrating diverse data and dark web insights, enhancing security solution efficacy and user experience.
ThreatConnect TIP centralizes threat data, automates detection, and integrates seamlessly, enhancing efficiency and collaboration with advanced analytics.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The features are simple to use, and the interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and apply the solutions.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
The API-first architecture that enables us to perform custom integration with other products and real-time distribution.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Categories and Ranking

Recorded Future
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Digital Risk Protection (1st)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Recorded Future is 7.9%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 3.9%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Recorded Future7.9%
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)3.9%
Other88.2%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1607682 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Cyber Threat Intelligence at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Integrating intelligence within systems refines threat detection and provides enriched data insights
The integration of Recorded Future with my SIEM, specifically Splunk SIEM, has been extremely valuable. Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it. Recorded Future allows me to maintain very accurate alerts.
WM
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
Effective threat management boosts data protection and enhances customer trust
We use ThreatConnect for our platform in the database to address the issues of threat attacks within the organization. It helps us look at solutions that can protect our data from being attacked.  Additionally, it provides an alert mechanism to warn clients in case of internet attacks, focusing on…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?
I am not the person responsible for purchases, but it's known that Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
What needs improvement with Recorded Future?
Their research capabilities and the human aspect should be more effective. The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs. Their research should be wider and more i...
What is your primary use case for Recorded Future?
Recorded Future ( /products/recorded-future-reviews ) is my main threat intelligence platform that provides alerts regarding brand protection, relevant threat actors, threat groups, and intelligenc...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow and reducing the complexity of configuring playbook an...
What is your primary use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) serves as the primary platform in our organization for IOC aggregation, normalization, and distribution to downstream security controls like SIEM, E...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk
Customer Case Studies & Use Cases
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.