Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Recorded Future offers valuable features like dark web monitoring, but its modular structure limits comprehensive coverage and financial returns.
Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations improved trust, sales, and efficiency with ThreatConnect, reducing costs and response times while mitigating false positives.
We have seen a return on investment as we have been able to identify leaked credentials and close those accounts off easily, thereby improving our security.
Account Manager at Chevron
We have reduced manual analyst effort by thirty to forty percent.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Many ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) customers report saving more than fifty percent of analyst time previously spent on manual threat data processing.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
This trust has led to an increase in sales because customers are confident we can protect their data.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Recorded Future's customer service is efficient with varying user satisfaction due to agent limitations and irrelevant information requests.
Sentiment score
7.5
ThreatConnect TIP customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, providing highly rated support despite occasional time zone delays.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
The customer support for Recorded Future is very responsive and proactive.
Account Manager at Chevron
The customer support team was responsive and knowledgeable, helping to resolve my issues efficiently and providing valuable assistance during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
They have been responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
I just like their customer support because, within a short period of contacting them, they are able to help navigate issues.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Recorded Future is praised for scalability and versatility, though some users have concerns about value and usage.
Sentiment score
7.5
ThreatConnect TIP scales efficiently, managing data and users seamlessly, ensuring robust performance and flexibility for growing organizations.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
The platform handles increased volumes of threat data, large numbers of users, and expanded deployments across multiple offices without performance degradation.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
ThreatConnect supports scalability by allowing us to identify threats and share information within our team networks.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Recorded Future is highly reliable with a 99.7% uptime, minimal issues, and is rated nine out of ten for stability.
Sentiment score
7.3
ThreatConnect TIP offers stable, reliable performance with high availability, effectively integrating with tools, despite occasional performance slowdowns.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
According to my experience, Recorded Future is very stable because I have not seen slow performance.
Account Manager at Chevron
The platform handles significant traffic while maintaining performance across cloud and on-premises deployments.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
 

Room For Improvement

Recorded Future should automate processes, simplify its system, and enhance capabilities for better threat intelligence and user experience.
ThreatConnect TIP's integration, pricing, and usability challenges hinder accessibility, with users seeking improved features and easier access.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.
Account Manager at Chevron
The pricing is high for smaller organizations, so it would be beneficial to have tiered pricing.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Improved pricing or tiered options could make it more accessible, especially for smaller organizations that do not require all enterprise features.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Recorded Future's high pricing, beneficial for large enterprises, poses a challenge for smaller companies due to its cost.
ThreatConnect TIP is priced mid-range, potentially costly for small firms, with costs based on deployment, support, and features.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.
Account Manager at Chevron
Some clients reported that the entry cost started around six figures, depending on deployment, configuration, and support options chosen.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The pricing seems a bit high for smaller companies.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
Generally, the pricing and setup cost are on the higher side.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Valuable Features

Recorded Future offers customized threat intelligence, integrating diverse data and dark web insights, enhancing security solution efficacy and user experience.
ThreatConnect TIP simplifies threat management with ease of use, automation, integrations, and improved detection and response capabilities.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
Head Of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Discount Bank
The best features of Recorded Future include providing the latest threat reports regarding artifacts, such as IPs, domains, or hashes.
Account Manager at Chevron
The features are simple to use, and the interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and apply the solutions.
Program associate at IMAGINE HER
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) can ingest and normalize threat intelligence from various internal and external sources including OSINT feeds, commercial feeds, internal logs, and EDR tools, centralizing it in one place and enriching that data with context to make it more actionable.
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The API-first architecture that enables us to perform custom integration with other products and real-time distribution.
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
 

Categories and Ranking

Recorded Future
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Digital Risk Protection (1st)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Recorded Future is 7.7%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 3.7%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Recorded Future7.7%
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)3.7%
Other88.6%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Derek  Lewis - PeerSpot reviewer
Account Manager at Chevron
Continuous threat intelligence has improved brand monitoring and protects against leaked credentials
Some of the areas that need improvement in Recorded Future include email reports that can show unrelated content. Sometimes alerts pop up for articles that have been published years ago but were just recently discovered by Recorded Future. For the browser extension, since the main purpose is to present information regarding IPs, I think it would be best to provide us with an idea of where the IP originates or some additional information about the organization it belongs to. API capabilities in Recorded Future are improving, but there are still some features that are missing and some errors that are hard to handle and understand. The price of Recorded Future is a bit high, especially for smaller teams working on a tight budget, but it is very effective and relatively competitive for large organizations.
Vyas Shubham - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Analyst at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Centralized threat insights have streamlined detection and automated phishing response
Based on my experience, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is already doing a great job in the market by decreasing threats from external sources. A few improvements I would suggest include integration enhancements, as users report that some integrations could be tighter or easier to configure. Additionally, plug and play connectors for popular security tools and threat feeds could streamline operations. There could also be easier event generation and sharing, as some reviewers mentioned that generating and sharing events or intelligence with internal teams or external partners is not as smooth as it could be. Improved pricing or tiered options could make it more accessible, especially for smaller organizations that do not require all enterprise features. Some users find the interface complex, particularly for everyday tasks such as filtering, tagging, or navigating playbooks. A more intuitive UI that aligns with typical analyst workflows would reduce the learning curve and boost productivity. To improve my rating closer to ten, the user interface can be simplified, as it is complex. Enhancing user experience and providing richer enrichment sources would further increase its value. Addressing these areas would make the platform more intuitive, comprehensive, and easier to adopt across all teams.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?
I am not the person responsible for purchases, but it's known that Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
What needs improvement with Recorded Future?
Their research capabilities and the human aspect should be more effective. The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs. Their research should be wider and more i...
What is your primary use case for Recorded Future?
Recorded Future ( /products/recorded-future-reviews ) is my main threat intelligence platform that provides alerts regarding brand protection, relevant threat actors, threat groups, and intelligenc...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
My experience with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is typical for an enterprise-grade threat intelligence solution and perceive...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Based on my experience, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is already doing a great job in the market by decreasing threats from external sources. A few improvements I would suggest i...
What is your primary use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
Our main use case for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is to centralize, analyze, and operationalize threat intelligence across our organization. We use it to aggregate threat data ...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk
Customer Case Studies & Use Cases
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.