Top 10 Recorded Future Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

767 followers

Top Recorded Future Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Recorded Future based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, VirusTotal, and Cymulate. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Recorded Future surpasses its competitors by offering real-time threat intelligence through advanced machine learning, enabling organizations to proactively mitigate risks with unparalleled accuracy and comprehensive threat analysis capabilities.

Recorded Future Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Recorded Future, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

Recorded Future offers powerful threat intelligence with social media investigations and data mining. CrowdStrike Falcon, in comparison, features effective endpoint detection and cloud deployment. Recorded Future's pricing demands careful consideration, while CrowdStrike's cost-effectiveness benefits larger enterprises with extensive features.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Recorded Future Report

Pricing

Recorded Future has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon is often noted for its higher setup fees, making it a key consideration.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon is often noted for its higher setup fees, making it a key consideration.

VirusTotal

4.4 out of 5

VirusTotal

4.4 out of 5

Recorded Future excels in dark web monitoring and integration, suitable for users valuing comprehensive intelligence. In comparison, VirusTotal, strong in malware detection and multi-antivirus integration, benefits tech buyers needing diverse API systems, although it lacks Recorded Future's dark web intelligence.

Download Recorded Future vs. VirusTotal Report

Pricing

Recorded Future requires a significant initial setup cost, whereas VirusTotal offers a streamlined process with a lower initial financial barrier, highlighting distinct differences in their pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

Cymulate

4.3 out of 5

Cymulate

4.3 out of 5

Recorded Future offers extensive threat intelligence and predictive analytics, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive data. In comparison, Cymulate excels in threat simulation and security validation, advantageous for those prioritizing vulnerability identification. Cymulate provides efficient cloud deployment, while Recorded Future offers strategic insight for detailed threat landscapes.

Download Cymulate vs. Recorded Future Report

Pricing

Recorded Future requires significant upfront investment, whereas Cymulate offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future requires significant upfront investment, whereas Cymulate offers a more cost-effective setup.

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System

4.0 out of 5

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System

4.0 out of 5

Recorded Future offers robust threat intelligence with strong dark web data search capabilities, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Trend Micro TippingPoint focuses on intrusion prevention with extensive IPS signature databases, suitable for network protection and offering different modes for enhanced flexibility.

Download Recorded Future vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Report

Pricing

Recorded Future has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, which requires a higher initial investment.

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

4.2 out of 5

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

4.2 out of 5

Recorded Future excels in threat detection and personalized alerts, offering extensive threat intelligence. In comparison, ThreatConnect focuses on automation and ease of use, providing effective data correlation. Recorded Future faces pricing challenges, while ThreatConnect could improve training resources.

Download Recorded Future vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report

Pricing

Recorded Future requires no setup cost, while ThreatConnect incurs a higher initial expenditure. This distinction is crucial for organizations evaluating budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future requires no setup cost, while ThreatConnect incurs a higher initial expenditure. This distinction is crucial for organizations evaluating budget constraints.

ZeroFOX

4.3 out of 5

ZeroFOX

4.3 out of 5

Recorded Future excels in threat intelligence and data analysis, appealing for its favorable pricing and rich insights. In comparison, ZeroFOX impresses with social media protection and brand monitoring, ideal for those prioritizing online brand safety despite higher costs.

Download Recorded Future vs. ZeroFOX Report

Pricing

Recorded Future's setup costs are competitive and transparent, while ZeroFOX offers a more flexible pricing model tailored to specific needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future's setup costs are competitive and transparent, while ZeroFOX offers a more flexible pricing model tailored to specific needs.

Anomali

3.5 out of 5

Anomali

3.5 out of 5

Recorded Future often attracts customers with its comprehensive threat intelligence database and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Anomali appeals through flexible pricing, streamlined data correlation, and extensive API support, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing customized integrations and cost-effectiveness.

Download Anomali vs. Recorded Future Report

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, while Anomali requires a more complex setup with potential extra expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, while Anomali requires a more complex setup with potential extra expenses.

ReversingLabs

4.6 out of 5

ReversingLabs

4.6 out of 5

Recorded Future excels in threat intelligence and predictive analytics, beneficial for organizations prioritizing real-time threat detection. In comparison, ReversingLabs offers advanced malware analysis and file inspection, ideal for businesses focusing on comprehensive malware defenses and flexible deployment options.

Download Recorded Future vs. ReversingLabs Report

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, contrasting with ReversingLabs, which requires a higher setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, contrasting with ReversingLabs, which requires a higher setup investment.

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence

4.2 out of 5

Recorded Future offers comprehensive data collection, actionable alerts, and flexible dashboards, proving valuable for threat analysts. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing robust threat detection and remediation, leveraging global telemetry data for addressing vulnerabilities efficiently.

Download Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Recorded Future Report

Pricing

Recorded Future's setup cost is notably higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future's setup cost is notably higher compared to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

Cybersixgill

4.4 out of 5

Cybersixgill

4.4 out of 5

Recorded Future offers comprehensive data analytics, real-time threat intelligence, and integration capabilities for organizations needing extensive threat analysis. In comparison, Cybersixgill provides robust dark web monitoring, delivering deep threat insights with seamless deployment and a more cost-effective initial setup.

Download Cybersixgill vs. Recorded Future Report

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a transparent setup cost structure, while Cybersixgill provides flexibility with customizable setup options.

View comparison

Pricing

Recorded Future offers a transparent setup cost structure, while Cybersixgill provides flexibility with customizable setup options.