AuditBoard vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) comparison

AuditBoard and Diligent are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Diligent is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.0. AuditBoard holds a 7.3% mindshare in G, compared to Diligent’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Diligent users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,514 Views
741 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Diligent One Platform (form...

Read 3 Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) reviews

1,063 Views
625 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Diligent One Platform (form...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Diligent One Platform and AuditBoard are competing products in the governance, risk, and compliance sector. AuditBoard is favored for its features, while Diligent appeals through pricing and support.

Features: Diligent One Platform includes robust risk management, governance capabilities, and flexible reporting options. AuditBoard provides comprehensive audit management, streamlined compliance processes, and real-time data analysis features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Diligent One Platform offers versatile deployment options with responsive support. AuditBoard prioritizes straightforward setup and dedicated customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Diligent One Platform is noted for competitive pricing and solid ROI. AuditBoard's higher cost is justified by its extensive features, attracting those prioritizing long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Diligent One Platform (form...

Ranking in GRC

8th

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Governance (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 7.3%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) is 3.7%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

WillWillis

Data Analyst at Rhythex

Good automation and analytics, but is costly

The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing reports that meet the expectations of our clients and customers. It would be beneficial if the focus could be shifted toward improving the reporting aspect. The impact report is a crucial aspect, as we only have one opportunity to create it. Galvanize HighBond can improve by generating more impact reports post-project, and allowing access to the reports using a web version, which would greatly benefit us. The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"There are lots of features."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

More AuditBoard pros

"The most valuable feature is automation."

Cons

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

More AuditBoard cons

"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

47%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuditBoard?

I believe the license is based on the number of key controls that will be tested regularly. You can also pay extra for additional modules, like risk testing and operational audits, etc.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Galvanize HighBond?

The most valuable feature is automation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Galvanize HighBond?

Regarding pricing, we are located in Africa where economic instability prevails and our currency continues to lose value due to inflation. The cost of the solution is high. I give the cost of the s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Galvanize HighBond?

See all answers

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 47% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 22% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 19% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 5% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs AuditBoard

Compared 4% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

ACL Analytics vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 62% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 22% of the time

RSA Archer vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 16% of the time

More Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

December 2024

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

December 2024

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report

Download Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize , Diligent GRC Platform

Learn More

AuditBoard

Diligent

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) offers a comprehensive solution for governance, risk, and compliance, catering to the advanced needs of enterprises seeking efficient oversight and regulatory adherence.

Designed to streamline complex processes, Diligent One Platform delivers a robust framework for enterprise risk management, audit, and compliance. It integrates seamlessly with existing workflows, ensuring transparency and efficiency. Users find its insights valuable for strategic decision-making, though certain areas could benefit from enhanced customization options.

What are the key features of Diligent One Platform?

Audit Management: Allows for comprehensive tracking and analysis of audit processes.
Risk Assessment: Facilitates identification and prioritization of potential risks.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements with ease.
Data Analytics: Provides in-depth analytics to drive informed decisions.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes for increased efficiency.

What advantages should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines governance and compliance processes to save time.
Strategic Insights: Delivers actionable insights for better decision-making.
Enhanced Risk Management: Effective in identifying and managing enterprise risks.
Seamless Integration: Integrates well with existing systems for smooth operation.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Diligent One Platform has been implemented to address stringent regulatory demands. Its ability to adapt to industry-specific requirements makes it a favored choice, enabling organizations to navigate complex regulatory landscapes effectively.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CNA Insurance

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

November 2024

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report.

See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.