Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AuthLite vs JumpCloud comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

iboss
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (23rd), Internet Security (8th), Web Content Filtering (5th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), ZTNA as a Service (15th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (15th)
AuthLite
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (27th)
JumpCloud
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (8th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Enterprise Password Managers (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), ZTNA as a Service (11th), Active Directory Bridge (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

GZ
Sep 25, 2021
Stable and quick to set up but needs more clear status information for end users
The solution is a corporate proxy server, an intelligence proxy From a corporate perspective, I understand that it's important to keep the company data safe. From a corporate point of view, it's a good solution. The solution is stable. The solution can scale.  It was a very easy product to…
Use AuthLite?
Share your opinion
Oscar Iván Mejía - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2023
Great synchronization and single sign on functionalities but can be a bit complex to set up
We primarily use the solution for synchronization.  This product has helped us to synchronize all of our accounts in Google Workspace with Microsoft 365. The single sign-on makes it very easy to access.  It offers great synchronization functionalities.  The solution is stable. It is scalable. We…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."
Information not available
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"JumpCloud's monthly license costs around $25 for the complete solution."
"I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"JumpCloud offers several subscription plans as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider. The pricing is based on the number of users and the services that are required, meaning that you only pay for what you consume and don't have to pay for services that you don't need. When compared to other solutions, JumpCloud can actually be more cost-effective, as it eliminates the need to hire a team, purchase hardware, pay for licenses and software, and worry about updates, security, and backups. Thus, it offers a more efficient and cost-effective solution for managing your needs."
"The cost of the solution is approximately $12 per user. However, the cost depends on what modules you're using. They have an all-in-one package and they do have tiers. For example, the more users you have, the cheaper it ends up being in the end too. I know they've done some changes to the pricing model and I haven't been involved in a lot of the licensing lately. I don't know the exact cost at this time."
"The pricing model changed about 18 months ago. It used to be that you got 10 users free, and then you paid for any user above 10 users. Now, when you go above 10 users, you pay for every user. It has become a bit more expensive, but it's such a good product. When you take into account Microsoft licenses, if you were to run Active Directory, you'd need a server to put it on, or you would need a couple of servers, backup, etc. It's a no-brainer. JumpCloud is so much easier to manage from my perspective, regardless of the cost increase. It's just brilliant."
"We are using an enterprise license for JumpCloud. We have purchased a license for approximately $3,000 a year, but we are charged more than $135,000 annually."
"The pricing is all on the JumpCloud website. It's not hidden, you don't have to go through a show me a quote type procedure. The pricing is straightforward to understand."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about iboss?
Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss.
What needs improvement with iboss?
Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent. This is a hiccup that iboss should im...
What is your primary use case for iboss?
We use iboss for the proxy solution. I used iboss in my organization to block a few sites for a few of my employees.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about JumpCloud?
The product enables device management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JumpCloud?
The solution is pretty expensive. It costs us EUR 250 per user per month. It was a point of hesitation for us. We can...
What needs improvement with JumpCloud?
We need more multi-factor authentication possibilities. I opened a ticket for it. However, it is not configurable in ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform
No data available
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.
Information Not Available
Cars.com, GoFundMe, Grab, ClassPass, Uplight, Beyond Finance, Foursquare
Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Software Technologies and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.