Automai AppVerify vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

Automai Corporation and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Automai Corporation is ranked #40, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Automai Corporation holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Automai AppVerify

115 Views
84 Comparison Views

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

2,342 Views
1,512 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Automai AppVerify

OpenText UFT Developer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automai AppVerify and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

40th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (25th)

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automai AppVerify is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?

Share your opinion

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad. NeoLoad is a strong competitor to LoadRunner and it's very fast. It saves a lot of time when creating s...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 57% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 5% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Regression Testing Tools

November 2024

Download Automai AppVerify product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

November 2024

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

Learn More

Automai Corporation

OpenText

Overview

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified. Get a free POC here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.