Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppVerify vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

Automai Corporation and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Automai Corporation is ranked #40, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Automai Corporation holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.
Automai AppVerify
  • 115 Views
  • 84 Comparison Views
OpenText UFT Developer
Read 36 OpenText UFT Developer reviews
  • 2,342 Views
  • 1,512 Comparison Views
78% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Automai AppVerify and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (25th)
OpenText UFT Developer
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
15th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automai AppVerify is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?
Share your opinion
Eitan Gold - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
Integrates well, has LeanFT library, and good object detection
We use Micro Focus UFT Developer to perform functional testing on both a desktop application and a web application One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library. They have LeanFT Library. This is the reason we choose…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."
"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."
"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."
"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."
"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."
"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."
"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."
"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."
More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad. NeoLoad is a strong competitor to LoadRunner and it's very fast. It saves a lot of time when creating s...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 57% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 26% of the time
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 5% of the time
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 3% of the time
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText UFT Developer Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText UFT Developer
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Regression Testing Tools
October 2024
Automai AppVerify reportDownload Automai AppVerify product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Developer
October 2024
OpenText UFT Developer reportDownload OpenText UFT Developer product report
 

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify
Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
 

Learn More

Automai Corporation
OpenText
 

Overview

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified. Get a free POC here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/
With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.
 

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
October 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.