OpenText UFT Developer vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 2.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

2,133 Views
1,416 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,405 Views
1,475 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Developer

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT Developer and UiPath Test Suite both compete in the test automation category, focusing on providing extensive support for modern testing needs. UiPath Test Suite appears to have the upper hand with its low-code capabilities and adaptability across industries.

Features: OpenText UFT Developer integrates well with developer environments, supports complex algorithms and protocols, and enables smooth transitions between UFT and LeanFT environments. It provides compatibility with Java and .NET platforms. UiPath Test Suite offers robust web and desktop automation, supports process automation, and includes tools like AI Center and Document Understanding for diverse business scenarios.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Developer should expand its browser support, stabilize its system, and enhance cross-platform testing. Users note its developer-centric focus can demand high technical expertise. UiPath Test Suite can improve its test management features, simplify system integration, and streamline test case creation. Both tools could enhance stability, efficiency, and user integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Developer supports mainly on-premises deployments, occasionally providing public cloud options. It's praised for performance consistency but criticized for variable technical support response times. UiPath Test Suite offers hybrid and private cloud deployments, reflecting modern infrastructure support, though its technical support could also improve in responsiveness. OpenText could improve its deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Developer's high pricing targets larger enterprises, distinguishing between floating and seat licenses per user, raising entry costs. UiPath Test Suite is also pricey but boasts a compelling feature set that justifies costs for large-scale implementations, benefiting from flexible modules and licensing options. Both require substantial investment, yet promise returns in dynamic test automation environments.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (13th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

Increases productivity compared to other tools

The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership."

"The solution helps to accelerate software testing automation. It will help to reduce lead time and increase productivity and efficiency."

"The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf."

"OpenText UFT Developer works well with record technology, making it valuable for recording."

"It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT Developer is the flexibility to work with many different types of software."

"It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."

More OpenText UFT Developer pros

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"It is a very scalable product."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"The price of the solution could improve."

"The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement."

"The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites."

"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

"UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive."

"The pricing could be improved."

"Stability depends on the company's infrastructure and end-to-end infrastructure. When I used the tool in my project, we had a big problem with many users using it simultaneously."

More OpenText UFT Developer cons

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice

"Its price is a bit high."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 61% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 23% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 42% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 22% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Opkey vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

January 2025

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

No data available

Overview

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

OpenText

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.