Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] vs Control-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] customer service is prompt, knowledgeable, and provides clear communication, quickly resolving issues with expertise.
Sentiment score
8.1
Control-M's customer service is largely praised for responsiveness and support, but some users report delays and documentation issues.
You can contact their support through a special portal if you encounter any issues or need assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence needs better reporting, documentation, integration, performance, learning curve, and customer support improvements.
Sentiment score
5.2
Users seek improved reporting, flexibility, integration, cost efficiency, error handling, modern interface, compatibility, and automation in Control-M.
The job reporting feature needs improvement.
The integration of the solution could be improved.
The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is praised for scalability, robust architecture, seamless integration, and consistent performance despite initial configuration challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Users praise Control-M's scalability, managing large job volumes and supporting enterprise environments, including cloud and on-premises deployments.
The tool supports any number of agents or jobs, given you have sufficient resources such as RAM, CPU, and storage for the database.
The solution is scalable, it can connect to multiple schedules.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
<p>Automic Automation Intelligence pricing is flexible, varies by requirements, but can be high for complex setups; inquire for detailed quotes.</p>
Sentiment score
6.1
Enterprise buyers find Control-M expensive for small businesses due to complex licensing but appreciate its features in larger environments.
The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used.
expensive infrastructure with great potential for scalability
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence offers reliable stability, minimal downtime, consistent performance, and effective workload handling, ensuring seamless operation and trust.
Sentiment score
6.4
Control-M is praised for its stability and performance, with quick support and updates resolving issues efficiently.
Automic Automation Intelligence is a highly stable solution.
I rate the tool's stability a nine point five out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence enhances efficiency with job scheduling, analytics, real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, tool integration, and predictive analysis.
Sentiment score
8.2
Control-M offers cross-platform integration, advanced scheduling, and ease of use, enhancing efficiency with automated error handling and comprehensive reporting.
The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place.
Its user interface is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Control-M
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
117
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

DS
Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios
The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.
Pedro Fuentes - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control
They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?
The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.
What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?
The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
While it is quite flexible, the licensing cost could be more affordable, especially for small and mid-sized enterprises.
 

Also Known As

Terma Suite
Control M
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.