Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] vs Control-M comparison

Broadcom and BMC are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of BMC users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation Intellig...

Read 3 Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Control-M

Read 116 Control-M reviews

23,832 Views
9,020 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Automic Automation Intellig...

Control-M

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Control-M and Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] are two prominent automation tools with distinct strengths and differences. Control-M shows a slight edge in user satisfaction concerning its wide-ranging features, while Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is credited for its cost-effectiveness and superior technical support.

Features:Control-M is praised for its broad scheduling capabilities and flexibility across different environments. Users value its comprehensive monitoring tools and seamless task automation. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] stands out for its user-friendly automation workflows and robust analytics that help in predictive operations. While Control-M offers a broader range of tools, Automic's predictability features take precedence in user reviews.

Room for Improvement:For Control-M, users cite a need for improvements in integration with cloud-based services and enhanced reporting functionalities. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] users recommend better documentation and more streamlined setup processes. The differences lie in Control-M needing cloud integration enhancements, whereas Automic requires better documentation and ease of initial setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Control-M's deployment process is seen as complex, but its customer service is regarded as responsive and helpful. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is noted for its relatively easier deployment procedure and excellent customer support. Thus, while Control-M's deployment can be challenging, Automic offers an easier setup with equally commendable support, balancing the deployment complexities with a satisfying support experience.

Pricing and ROI:Control-M has higher setup costs but users report substantial ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL], conversely, is appreciated for its lower setup costs and quick realization of ROI. Therefore, while Control-M offers great long-term value, Automic is preferred for businesses focusing on cost efficiency and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 813,418 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Control-M

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (7th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (8th), Workload Automation (1st)

Featured Reviews

Dalibor Sefcik

Personal Assistant at Centrum.sk

Jan 11, 2024

Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios

The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.

Read full review

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Jan 9, 2024

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"Ability to handle files remotely through the advanced file transfer feature."

"Before Control-M, we didn't have a centralized view and could not view what happened in the past to determine what will happen in the future. The Gantt view that we have in Control-M is like a project view. It is nice because we sometimes have some application maintenance that we need to do. So, in a single console, we can hold the jobs for the next hour or two. We can release that job when it is finished. This is a really nice feature that we didn't have before. It is something really simple, but we didn't previously have a console where we could say, "For the next two hours, what are the jobs that we will run? And, hold these jobs not to run." This is really important."

"Control-M is excellent when it comes to building, scheduling, managing, and monitoring production workflows. Those workflows are of very high importance to our operations."

"There is a batch monitoring tool called Batch Impact Manager, which proactively warns when processing is behind and SLAs are in jeopardy of being missed."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

"We can set up automated email notifications to the programmers or the whole team for a particular job. It helps save time because we're not consistently looking at the job to see if it has ended or failed."

"Control-M is useful to automate all critical and non-critical processes. Using Control-M, we can automate application workflows as well as file transfers involved in application workflows. We can also use it to run batches related to applications. Automating these processes reduces the RTO and RPO, which helps in the case of failures. It also helps us to identify bottlenecks and take corrective measures."

"It is an enterprise tool that integrates with all the applications in our organization. It has made our life easier because we don't need to wake up at midnight and do monitoring, etc. It does everything. It also sends precautionary alerts. If a job or activity is running for more than the specified time, it alerts the application team. So, our teams do not need to sit in front of a laptop or any open application to watch the jobs. They can do their other regular activities while Control-M takes care of all the jobs. It notifies them when there is job completion, delay, and error."

More Control-M pros

Cons

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

"But for some issues, BMC will suggest to upgrade to new version which will not be feasible to standards of the organisation. Hence some work around should be shown to run the business until new version was upgraded."

"I am unsure if Control-M is compliant with Microsoft Azure environment integrations. We have some clients in Azure environments. Specifically, in Canada, government agencies and nonprofits mostly use Microsoft Azure."

"It is a very strong product, but the reporting could be better."

"For installing or upgrading the PeopleSoft and SAP plugins, currently there is no way to do it via Control-M Configuration Manager. So, we are installing or upgrading the plugins, like PeopleSoft and SAP, manually. If BMC could provide an option via Control-M Configuration Manager to upgrade these plugins, it probably would reduce a lot of manual work as well as ease our work. This is one improvement that I personally want to see, because it would help our way of working."

"The next major release needs to focus on the lightweight web client."

"Control-M reporting is a bit of a pain point right now. Control-M doesn't have robust reporting. I would like to see better reporting options. I would like to be able to pull charts or statistics that look nicer. Right now, we can pull some data, but it is kind of choppy. It would be nicer to have enterprise-level reporting that you can present to managers."

"Control-M should receive more notice when it releases new features. The user interface is also a bit complex, and the navigation should be streamlined."

"The stability of Control-M has Not been great. A big thing we've been trying to work on with BMC is observability. Modern applications should be observable and resilient, but we're finding that sometimes Control-M is not very resilient and many times Control-M is not very observable."

More Control-M cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

"We are paying way more for Control-M than we've paid for any of our other scheduling tools."

"BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."

"The price is right because of the licensing schema, which is based on nodes and processes. You purchase what you use, no more and no less, and you can grow with time."

"The license model is based on the number of jobs we run on the SaaS application or the number of executions, unlike the on-premise model options. If we have a handful of jobs, it's always good to consider Control-M, but if it's a large number of jobs, Control-M might not be a great option."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's not an exorbitant amount. The licensing is pretty reasonable for the number of jobs that we run."

"Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."

"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."

"Control-M isn't cheap, but this is an enterprise model."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?

The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Automation Intelligence?

The job reporting feature needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?

The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

The pricing for Control-M is very expensive. It would be beneficial if the price could be reduced.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

AppWorx Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Automic Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

More Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 9% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

Rocket Zena vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

September 2024

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

October 2024

Download Control-M product report

Also Known As

Terma Suite

Control M

Learn More

Broadcom

BMC

Overview

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is designed for batch job scheduling and workload automation, improving efficiency in complex IT environments by monitoring, predicting, and optimizing job completion times.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] assists organizations in managing batch job scheduling and workload automation, providing detailed insights into job dependencies and performance. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems enhances collaboration, reduces manual intervention, and offers greater control over IT processes. With robust monitoring capabilities and comprehensive reporting, it helps in making informed decisions, although it requires better scalability and improved performance handling large datasets. Improved integration with third-party tools and more comprehensive documentation would further enhance its usability.

What are the key features of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]?

Exceptional workload automation: Streamlines batch job scheduling and workload automation.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides detailed reports for better insights and decision-making.
Predictive analytics: Monitors and predicts job completion times for improved efficiency.
Robust monitoring: Enhances operational transparency with strong monitoring capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced efficiency: Reduces manual intervention and optimizes job management.
Better control: Improved monitoring and insights offer greater control over IT processes.
Operational transparency: Provides visibility into job dependencies and performance metrics.
Informed decision-making: Detailed reporting supports strategic planning and execution.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to automate and optimize complex IT workflows, ensuring efficient management and operation of critical systems.

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Tidal Software by Redwood and others in Workload Automation. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.