Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] vs Control-M comparison

Broadcom and BMC are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of BMC users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation Intellig...

Read 3 Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Control-M

Read 120 Control-M reviews

18,934 Views
7,626 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Automic Automation Intellig...

Control-M

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

Control-M and Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] are competing in the workload automation category. Control-M holds an advantage with its seamless integration capabilities, whereas Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers a superior level of advanced analytics.

Features: Control-M offers comprehensive workflow automation, advanced scheduling capabilities, and robust support. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] provides superior predictive analytics, optimized IT operations through data insights, and real-time decision-making tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is recognized for an easy deployment process and reliable customer service, enhancing the implementation speed. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers a more complex setup but balances it with high customization options and strategic deployment guidance, supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M has a competitive setup cost with a strong return on investment due to efficient resource utilization. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] demands a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI from its advanced performance analytics and cost savings driven by automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Control-M

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Hashim

Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable

There are approximately seven connectors for enterprises. This vendor doe snot has a lot of competition in the market. I recommend beginning with AI as it will provide us with a comprehensive understanding of your batches as a whole. If there are other participations or downstream processes involved, we can integrate them with AI, creating a centralized hub for your engineer batch, both downstream and upstream. I rate Automic Automation Intelligence an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

"As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive."

"It is simple to create, integrate, and automate data pipelines and to ingest data from different platforms. It integrates well between platforms."

"Technical support is very helpful and available 24/7."

"The monitoring tool is very good. It's very easy for expert and entry-level users to use on short notice."

"It is very stable. We hardly get calls in respect to issues on Control-M, particularly on version 9.0.19."

"The most valuable features are the Advanced File Transfer and the manage file transfer. They make transferring files securely seamless. It's very easy to set up, get deployed, and have it transferred to and from vendors. As long as we can get our firewall rules implemented at a decent time, it's very easy and seamless to get important files transferred in a secure manner."

"It has multiple features. You can plan your execution in Control-M. It provides one single window where you can define workflows regardless of geographic boundaries and platforms. A batch process can be executed from this single window. It provides insights into your processes. Your business people will know what process they are running and what is the state of the process. Instead of knowing that they're not going to meet the SLA the next morning, the business people immediately know the changes in their process. Control-M is very easy. I can tell a non-technical person that this is how it works, and he would be able to easily understand it. Business people can understand the methodology of Control-M and the intuitive features that it has. It has a fantastic graphical user interface and is easy to understand. You just have to drag and drop but in a very intuitive way. Monitoring features are also good. It has different color coding schemes, which can help you to understand the status of your workflow. An operator who is not that technical and is just monitoring the status of the application can see by color-coding the status of a process. If anything goes wrong or a process is stuck, it gives you a hint. You can just right-click and see the logs and the output. Even if the system is not right there in the data center and is located somewhere else, you can monitor it right from there and see the workflows."

More Control-M pros

Cons

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

"The response time could be faster when you need a person to answer your questions. There are situations where availability becomes crucial."

"I would like not to have to reach out to a third-party application company to do automated notifications. Right now, we still have people manually calling people and emailing people. There's a company called xMatters - and there are others - that has an API through Control-M that can automate any aspect of failure management. I'd like to see it build right into the product. I'd like to see a better notification product."

"It is a very strong product, but the reporting could be better."

"A lot of businesses are using ServiceNow, which is another tool. I would like there to be some integration with ServiceNow or other third-party tools as well as have easily available integrations. Right now, we need to write scripts. Apart from that, if there were some integrations with an ITSM tool, then that would be good. Because at the end of the day, most of our clients are using different ITSM tools. I know that BMC Remedy is easy to integrate with Control-M. However, if there was availability for Jira as well as other ITSM and DevOps tools, that would be a good improvement."

"You need to pay for extra features if you need them."

"Control-M reporting is a bit of a pain point right now. Control-M doesn't have robust reporting. I would like to see better reporting options. I would like to be able to pull charts or statistics that look nicer. Right now, we can pull some data, but it is kind of choppy. It would be nicer to have enterprise-level reporting that you can present to managers."

"I would like to have a web version of Control-M to replace the client. Currently, our support and jobs-creation teams are using the client and that needs to be installed on a PC. It's very heavy, consuming a lot of resources compared to the web portal. I know that they're trying to improve the client with the latest version, but for me, there hasn't been enough improvement yet."

"Control-M could benefit from incorporating AI features for better job scheduling."

More Control-M cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."

"We have a license till 2024. We are good and satisfied with it."

"This is now from my previous years as support for banks and big companies. If it's not enterprise scale, I find that it's too expensive for smaller companies. You really have to be quite big and need to have a dedicated support staff to run it, then you'll be fine. What we've seen at smaller companies, it's too expensive because they want to automate everything. Now, stuff that can literally run once a day for the rest of their lives is costing them $3 a job a day. It becomes too expensive, eventually. They are not seeing the return on investment because it's not business critical. Nobody is going to die or they're going to lose money if that job didn't run exactly at 11 minutes past 4:00. It's definitely for bigger enterprise companies, especially banks or healthcare providers. We have had an instance where Control-M was unavailable due to external factors for 20 minutes and there was a loss of almost a million euros because the solution involved logistics."

"You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."

"Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."

"The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."

"We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing."

"In our environment, pricing depends on the total number of maximum jobs that can run, which is fine. Therefore, if the number of jobs increases, then the licensing fees will increase."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?

The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Automation Intelligence?

The job reporting feature needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?

The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

It is a little bit expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 16% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

March 2025

Download Control-M product report

Also Known As

Terma Suite

Control M

Overview

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is designed for batch job scheduling and workload automation, improving efficiency in complex IT environments by monitoring, predicting, and optimizing job completion times.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] assists organizations in managing batch job scheduling and workload automation, providing detailed insights into job dependencies and performance. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems enhances collaboration, reduces manual intervention, and offers greater control over IT processes. With robust monitoring capabilities and comprehensive reporting, it helps in making informed decisions, although it requires better scalability and improved performance handling large datasets. Improved integration with third-party tools and more comprehensive documentation would further enhance its usability.

What are the key features of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]?

Exceptional workload automation: Streamlines batch job scheduling and workload automation.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides detailed reports for better insights and decision-making.
Predictive analytics: Monitors and predicts job completion times for improved efficiency.
Robust monitoring: Enhances operational transparency with strong monitoring capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced efficiency: Reduces manual intervention and optimizes job management.
Better control: Improved monitoring and insights offer greater control over IT processes.
Operational transparency: Provides visibility into job dependencies and performance metrics.
Informed decision-making: Detailed reporting supports strategic planning and execution.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to automate and optimize complex IT workflows, ensuring efficient management and operation of critical systems.

Broadcom

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.