AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] comparison

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] and AutoSys Workload Automation are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of AutoSys Workload Automation users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation Intellig...

Read 3 Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 79 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

7,880 Views
5,787 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Automic Automation Intellig...

AutoSys Workload Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 22, 2024

AutoSys Workload Automation and Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] are competitors in the workload automation category. AutoSys Workload Automation seems to have an advantage in support and pricing, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

Features: AutoSys Workload Automation offers scalability, integration capabilities, and support for complex IT environments. It integrates effectively with SAP and PeopleSoft. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] features predictive analytics, real-time forecasting, and the ability to provide deeper insights into workload performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys Workload Automation has a straightforward deployment process and reliable support services, making it convenient for quick deployment. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] comes with a more complex deployment due to its comprehensive features but is supported by detailed documentation that aids implementation.

Pricing and ROI: AutoSys Workload Automation generally provides a cost-effective setup aimed at large-scale enterprises, offering favorable ROI. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] incurs higher initial costs but supports a higher ROI through features that enhance operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AutoSys Workload Automation

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (8th)

Featured Reviews

Dalibor Sefcik

Personal Assistant at Centrum.sk

Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios

The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.

Read full review

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

"We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide."

"I prefer AutoSys over the other ones out there for ease of use, ease of understanding, and getting people to understand how the tool works."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."

"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."

"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."

"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

Cons

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."

"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."

"The reporting system, currently, could be better."

"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."

"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."

"The graphical interface can be improved."

"Ease of implementation for upgrades."

"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"It is overpriced."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Financial Services Firm

47%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?

The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Automation Intelligence?

The job reporting feature needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?

The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

We paid to use the solution monthly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

Automic Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

AppWorx Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

More Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 39% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

November 2024

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

December 2024

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Also Known As

Terma Suite

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Learn More

Broadcom

Overview

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is designed for batch job scheduling and workload automation, improving efficiency in complex IT environments by monitoring, predicting, and optimizing job completion times.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] assists organizations in managing batch job scheduling and workload automation, providing detailed insights into job dependencies and performance. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems enhances collaboration, reduces manual intervention, and offers greater control over IT processes. With robust monitoring capabilities and comprehensive reporting, it helps in making informed decisions, although it requires better scalability and improved performance handling large datasets. Improved integration with third-party tools and more comprehensive documentation would further enhance its usability.

What are the key features of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]?

Exceptional workload automation: Streamlines batch job scheduling and workload automation.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides detailed reports for better insights and decision-making.
Predictive analytics: Monitors and predicts job completion times for improved efficiency.
Robust monitoring: Enhances operational transparency with strong monitoring capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced efficiency: Reduces manual intervention and optimizes job management.
Better control: Improved monitoring and insights offer greater control over IT processes.
Operational transparency: Provides visibility into job dependencies and performance metrics.
Informed decision-making: Detailed reporting supports strategic planning and execution.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to automate and optimize complex IT workflows, ensuring efficient management and operation of critical systems.

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.