AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] comparison

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] and AutoSys Workload Automation are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of AutoSys Workload Automation users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation Intellig...

Read 3 Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 81 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,793 Views
4,876 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Automic Automation Intellig...

AutoSys Workload Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

AutoSys Workload Automation and Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] compete in the IT workload automation category. AutoSys Workload Automation appears to have an upper hand in ease of use and cost-effectiveness, whereas Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is superior in advanced features and configuration flexibility.

Features: AutoSys Workload Automation features robust scheduling capabilities, an intuitive interface, and effective workload monitoring. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers advanced predictive analytics, a robust dashboard, and enhanced reporting abilities, allowing for detailed decision-making.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys Workload Automation provides straightforward deployment and efficient customer support. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers a comprehensive deployment model with a reliable service team, although it might require longer setup times.

Pricing and ROI: AutoSys Workload Automation is characterized by a lower setup cost and strong ROI, attracting those focused on immediate returns. Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] has a higher upfront investment, with advanced functionalities providing a long-term productivity gain that may justify the expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AutoSys Workload Automation

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (7th)

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Hashim

Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable

There are approximately seven connectors for enterprises. This vendor doe snot has a lot of competition in the market. I recommend beginning with AI as it will provide us with a comprehensive understanding of your batches as a whole. If there are other participations or downstream processes involved, we can integrate them with AI, creating a centralized hub for your engineer batch, both downstream and upstream. I rate Automic Automation Intelligence an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

"Running anything in crontab, you need to put a lot of logic into it to make it work. With this product, you don't have to worry about it. You have the schedule object where you put all the dates or holidays in it, and it does it for you."

"We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin."

"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."

"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."

"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."

"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."

"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."

"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

Cons

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."

"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."

"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."

"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."

"The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash."

"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."

"Some of the reports are either a bit hard to understand or don’t give you what you might expect to see."

"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"It is overpriced."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?

The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Automation Intelligence?

The job reporting feature needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?

The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 35% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2025

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

March 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Also Known As

Terma Suite

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Overview

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is designed for batch job scheduling and workload automation, improving efficiency in complex IT environments by monitoring, predicting, and optimizing job completion times.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] assists organizations in managing batch job scheduling and workload automation, providing detailed insights into job dependencies and performance. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems enhances collaboration, reduces manual intervention, and offers greater control over IT processes. With robust monitoring capabilities and comprehensive reporting, it helps in making informed decisions, although it requires better scalability and improved performance handling large datasets. Improved integration with third-party tools and more comprehensive documentation would further enhance its usability.

What are the key features of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]?

Exceptional workload automation: Streamlines batch job scheduling and workload automation.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides detailed reports for better insights and decision-making.
Predictive analytics: Monitors and predicts job completion times for improved efficiency.
Robust monitoring: Enhances operational transparency with strong monitoring capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced efficiency: Reduces manual intervention and optimizes job management.
Better control: Improved monitoring and insights offer greater control over IT processes.
Operational transparency: Provides visibility into job dependencies and performance metrics.
Informed decision-making: Detailed reporting supports strategic planning and execution.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to automate and optimize complex IT workflows, ensuring efficient management and operation of critical systems.

Broadcom

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.