Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automox vs Nucleus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automox handles numerous endpoints efficiently, though some users report challenges with multi-tenant manageability, load times, and minor issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
Automox offers cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, intuitive interface, robust patch management, automation, and enhances workflow efficiency with seamless deployments.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Automox needs to improve profile syncing, notifications, access control, inventory, multi-group policies, workstation access, and patch bandwidth reduction.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automox is highly stable, fast, and reliable, with prompt maintenance and mostly positive user experiences in a cloud-based environment.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Automox customer support is highly praised for its responsiveness, knowledge, and attentiveness, often viewed as a valuable partnership.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Automox offers cost-effective endpoint management at around $2 per month with support for multiple OS and straightforward licensing.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Automox
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
46th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (55th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (18th), Patch Management (14th)
Nucleus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
50th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (38th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Jack Leung - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use and deploy agents but needs more stability
We just need to deploy the agent to the endpoints. We don't need to set up anything. For a single agent, it takes one or two minutes. However, we deployed globally, and you need to take into consideration the time it will take to deploy across each endpoint. It's very simple to deploy. We had three or four engineers take care of the implementation.
Use Nucleus?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automox?
It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?
We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.
What needs improvement with Automox?
They need to improve the automation features. It could be more stable.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Wiz and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.