AWS Amplify vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.0% mindshare in RA, compared to Microsoft’s 31.1% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS Amplify

Read 7 AWS Amplify reviews

748 Views
741 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Read 136 Microsoft Azure DevOps reviews

14,773 Views
8,273 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS Amplify

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Microsoft Azure DevOps and AWS Amplify compete in the cloud-based development services category, with Azure DevOps having the edge in integration and collaboration, appealing to enterprises, while AWS Amplify stands out for ease of use in mobile and web deployment tasks.

Features: Microsoft Azure DevOps provides project management, code repositories, and robust CI/CD pipelines, making it ideal for large enterprise needs. AWS Amplify offers streamlined workflows and real-time features, catering to developers prioritizing speed and efficiency in mobile and web applications.

Room for Improvement: Azure DevOps could enhance its user-friendliness for non-enterprise users and improve cost management features. AWS Amplify would benefit from more advanced integration capabilities, improved documentation for complex use cases, and enhanced collaboration features but has UIs focused on simplicity over business needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure DevOps excels in integration with Microsoft services and supports complex deployments, with comprehensive customer service. AWS Amplify offers a straightforward deployment process, focusing on speed and backed by AWS's efficient support model, appealing to smaller projects requiring quick turnarounds.

Pricing and ROI: Azure DevOps generally has higher setup costs, offering substantial ROI for large-scale enterprises due to its comprehensive offerings. AWS Amplify focuses on minimizing initial costs with a pay-as-you-go model, providing attractive ROI for smaller teams aiming for rapid launches without heavy financial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Amplify

Ranking in Release Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Ranking in Release Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

136

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS Amplify is 2.0%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps is 31.1%, down from 38.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps	31.1%
AWS Amplify	2.0%
Other	66.9%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Shrihari Haridas

DevOps Engineer at Burns & McDonnell

Amplify CLI acts as a single source of truth

The Amplify CLI acts as a single source of truth. You install the SDK from there, and using the Amplify API, you can talk to and manage AWS services directly from your code. You don't need to go to the GUI and click through menus - everything is manageable through the Amplify API at the code level. AWS Amplify integrates seamlessly with other services through AWS CloudFormation. Amplify first connects to the cloud for me. Whenever we write down the SDK, it's managed by CloudFormation. CloudFormation still happens on our cloud for your application because everything is updated with the help of cloud automation. Anything we need to change, we just add it to Amplify, and Amplify triggers the CloudFormation templates. Then it logs permission, updates the whole thing, or whatever you need it to ask.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices

I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is user management, which includes authentication and authorization."

"The only tricky part I experienced was during the initial installation. I followed the documentation, but it wasn't working for some reason. I had to modify some local files in the CLI-generated folder to get it to work. I had to dig deep to find the issue, and it wasn't mentioned in the docs. So, some issues could be better highlighted in the AWS CLI documentation, which would help developers integrate other services more easily. AWS needs to improve its support."

"I didn't host my application but have used their backend as a service. It was a complete package with authentication, AWS AppSync, DynamoDB, and GraphQL. AWS Amplify is great if you don't know backend development and don't want to struggle with other backend services like MongoDB. You don't have to worry about what backend language or database to use. If you're confused, enroll with AWS Amplify. I also recommend Google Firebase for similar purposes."

"Typically, whenever we make changes and need to switch environments (e.g., dev to production), it's easy for our developers to maintain the state of each environment and make customizations as needed. They don't necessarily need to involve the cloud team for basic management."

"The link with Figma is very nice. You can create your design in Figma, and then you can import it into AWS Amplify and use it. You can link it to your data source and data bindings."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Amplify is authentication."

"One of the things I like best about AWS Amplify is its ease of use and strong integration with other AWS services, which enhances efficiency."

"Fields can be customized and the reporting is good."

"My team likes the integration that Microsoft Azure DevOps has with GitHub and Microsoft Teams. The solution is well integrated with other Microsoft tools in one place, it is very good."

"I definitely like the pipelines and the ease of management once you're in an enterprise."

"It is good for monitoring purposes. We are using the build pipelines of Microsoft Azure. They are also valuable."

"If someone is considering developing and deploying the infrastructure in this solution, then using this tool is perfect because it's fully integrated with the pipelines and with a server core repository."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"Azure DevOps is highly valued for being an all-in-one solution."

"The installation is very straightforward."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pros

Cons

"Its capability to handle big projects needs to be improved. If you generate a user interface in Figma and import everything where all components are in one directory, currently, it is complicated. It isn't able to cope with that. For small projects, it is not an issue, but if you have big projects and you want to use AWS Amplify, then it gets more difficult. That is the most important point for me. It should be improved to cope better with bigger projects."

"I like AWS Amplify's documentation. It's comprehensive and includes many examples, so you don't need to ask for help much - you can refer to the docs. It's easy to use. I also appreciate the cost structure. You only pay for what you use. For example, if you use 100 GB, you're charged for that, but if you don't use it, you pay the maintenance cost."

"AWS can implement multiple web applications, and cross-platform applications, like iOS."

"AWS Amplify can be improved in some areas, particularly in providing more robust documentation and easier customization options."

"I don't think there are major issues, but there is room for improvement in the UI/UX of AWS Amplify. The UI still needs to be more polished and user-friendly. It's currently a bit like drag-and-drop initially, but there should be more options to customize the UI based on our needs."

"AWS Amplify could improve in the deployment. It would be beneficial to have more methods, such as automation."

"The documentation needs improvement, as it is not user-friendly and can be challenging for novices."

"We are currently in the process of moving all of our on-prem to the cloud platform. We are trying to make that move and host the majority of our DevOps services in the cloud because the cloud is where most of the things are going nowadays. However, the process of this transfer is not straightforward, and it could be a lot easier. Microsoft hasn't provided the maturity for migration tools. It could be a lot easier in that respect. I want to see them continue to advance the API capabilities. They could add some more robust functionality to the administrative layer within ADO services. There are a lot of configuration elements that you need to take care of at the organization level and the project configuration level from an administrative capacity. When you're dealing with process templates and things of that nature, you have to do them all manually. Being able to automate some of that using scripts or API functionality would be really nice."

"In comparison to JIRA, I believe DevOps has very poor reporting and metrics support."

"It is very difficult to integrate the product with third-party tools."

"The test management section needs to be improved."

"Microsoft Azure DevOps should create some training materials."

"The solution could be made faster because it can be a little unnerving to browse through too many pages and press too many buttons."

"Being more technology-agnostic through ease of integration would be beneficial."

"The interface is very bad."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on what your use case is and whether you're an existing AWS customer. It's a pay-as-you-go model, so not expensive."

"When you're just starting, it is free. You have to pay only when you reach a certain amount of usage. I'm still at the early stage. So, I don't have to pay a lot. At the moment, it is not too expensive for me. It is worth the money."

"We do not pay licenses for this solution."

"I am not aware of any licensing subscriptions for the solution."

"There is a licensing fee of $6/user per month."

"There is a license for this solution."

"I don't know the pricing of DevOps. It would be much cheaper than ALM because ALM came out as a software product initially. Now they are moving into a cloud and subscription model. In that case, Microsoft is coming from Azure and the cloud and DevOps and software as a service, so it would be much cheaper, but the catch would be that they are trying to get money on all the sides, like an operating system, Microsoft Office, or Microsoft Azure DevOps."

"The main agile features are very expensive."

"The costs are moderate and justify the value provided."

"As a Microsoft Partner, you get a discount on the pricing. Licensing costs are around $80 a month for DevOps, but for Azure, it is about $200 a month."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Amplify?

Typically, whenever we make changes and need to switch environments (e.g., dev to production), it's easy for our developers to maintain the state of each environment and make customizations as need...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Amplify?

I find the pricing of AWS Amplify reasonable, considering the value it provides, although opinions may vary based on usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Amplify?

AWS Amplify can be improved in some areas, particularly in providing more robust documentation and easier customization options.

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CodeDeploy vs AWS Amplify

Compared 28% of the time

Ozone vs AWS Amplify

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS Amplify

Compared 12% of the time

GitLab vs AWS Amplify

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Amplify Competitors

GitLab vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 58% of the time

Jira vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 2% of the time

Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify

January 2026

Download AWS Amplify product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure DevOps

December 2025

Download Microsoft Azure DevOps product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps

Overview

AWS Amplify is a set of purpose-built tools and features that lets frontend web and mobile developers quickly and easily build full-stack applications on AWS, with the flexibility to leverage the breadth of AWS services as your use cases evolve. With Amplify, you can configure a web or mobile app backend, connect your app in minutes, visually build a web frontend UI, and easily manage app content outside the AWS console. Ship faster and scale effortlessly—with no cloud expertise needed.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.

Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:

Azure Pipelines - Develop and deploy services to support ongoing application integration and delivery. Azure pipelines, which work with almost every project type and most languages, will automatically test code projects in order to make them available to others.
Azure Artifacts - Share packages and integrate package sharing between teams. Packages include NuGet, npm, and Maven, in addition to other private and public sources. Developers can now share and consume packages with other developers from different public registries.
Azure Repos - Offers source control of your code through Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) or Git repositories. Developers can now keep track of any changes that are made in their code over the course of their project.
Azure Test Plans - Offers continuous and manual/exploratory app testing through several tools. Test Suites, or a collection of Test Cases, are grouped together in a container called a Test Plan.
Azure Boards - Provides a suite of Agile tools to track work, support planning, code defects, and general issues while using Kanban and Scrum software. Teams are in need of tools that are flexible and will help them grow. Azure Boards is a service that helps developers manage their software projects.

Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:

A quick setup and easy deployment
An elastic scale
Exceptional security
No-maintenance operations
Effortless collaboration through domains
The ability to create and deploy products faster than traditional software

Reviews from Real Users

Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.

PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”

Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype

Buyer's Guide

AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Amplify vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.