Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Auto Scaling vs Grafana comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Grafana
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana is 6.4%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mbula Mboma - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosts deployment efficiency with seamless automatic scaling capabilities
My primary use case for Auto Scaling is mainly to deploy applications at scale Auto Scaling has made the deployment of applications more efficient, allowing us to manage traffic and maintain performance as user counts increase. Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic…
Vikash-Agarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Displays data visually from multiple sources while integrating seamlessly with existing systems
Grafana provides a user-friendly interface for viewing infrastructure metrics through dashboards. It integrates with Prometheus to pull data and offers a straightforward setup process. Users can monitor metrics with greater ease, and the tool aids in quickly identifying issues by providing a visual representation of data. Grafana's integration capability is straightforward, which facilitates building dashboards as needed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The setup is not very complex."
"The product provides self-healing features."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
"Grafana is stable and has great engineers."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"Grafana is stable and has great engineers."
"It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports."
"​Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services.​"
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"I find Grafana beneficial due to its numerous plugins."
 

Cons

"The product’s security features need improvement."
"It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"It could be cheaper."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"We need different kinds of applications in our infrastructure to see information in Grafana."
"There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage."
"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"Grafana could improve by having its own query language. Currently, it uses languages like Prometheus or InfluxDB, which not everyone knows. Their query language should be easier."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"I find issues with Grafana. For example, I am unable to open some services there. Then, we have to open ten different tabs to get it fixed. And it's annoying when there's something going on; we want to check Grafana, and it throws four different errors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"The product is expensive."
"My company uses the open-source version of Grafana, so it's free."
"I am using an open-source version"
"We are using the open-source license."
"You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
"I give the price an eight out of ten."
"I use the open source model so it is free."
"We use the open-source version of Grafana."
"​Grafana is free and open source.​"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time. It requires a downtime ...
What do you like most about Grafana?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
I used the open-source version for my learning, which was free. In an enterprise setting, pricing is reasonable, as many customers use it.
What needs improvement with Grafana?
The interface is not well-liked by my customers. Grafana cannot be easily embedded into certain applications and offers limited customization options for graphs. I think predictive capabilities in ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. Grafana and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.