AWS CodeCommit vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and source code management category. AWS CodeCommit has the upper hand due to its integration and security features, yet Git's pricing and simplicity make it more appealing for some users.

Features: Git is appreciated for its straightforward version control, extensive community support, and broader range of integrations with various development tools. AWS CodeCommit users value its seamless integration with other AWS services, enhanced security features, and cloud-specific capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Git users often desire better support for large files, improved conflict resolution tools, and more native enterprise-level features. AWS CodeCommit users suggest enhancements in stability, an easier setup process, and better onboarding resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git is known for its quick setup across multiple environments and responsive community-driven support. AWS CodeCommit provides a smoother experience within the AWS ecosystem but requires more thorough initial configuration. Customer support for AWS is robust, though some users find Git's community support faster for troubleshooting common issues.

Pricing and ROI: Git stands out with its free open-source nature, making it cost-effective for many. AWS CodeCommit incurs additional costs due to AWS service integration but offers greater value for users needing comprehensive cloud-based solutions. Git is favored for smaller teams and individual projects, whereas AWS CodeCommit demonstrates better return on investment for organizations heavily utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Git Report (Updated: April 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.7%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 7.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The solution scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."

"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

More Git pros

Cons

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"It's not very user-friendly."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"Git is completely free."

"Git is an open-source software."

"The tool is free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 77% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 23% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 35% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 17% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download Git product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

AWS CodeCommit vs. Git