AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.6, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeDeploy

Read 13 AWS CodeDeploy reviews

1,147 Views
1,012 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Read 68 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews

2,286 Views
1,565 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodeDeploy

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AWS CodeDeploy are competitive solutions in IT automation and deployment. While Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform showcases advantages in pricing and support, AWS CodeDeploy stands out with its comprehensive feature set, balancing performance and value.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers robust integration options, comprehensive automation capabilities, and open-source flexibility, providing users with extensive customization. AWS CodeDeploy excels at seamless deployment automation within AWS environments and tight integration with AWS services, making it a strong choice for scalability. It has an enhanced feature set for cloud-native environments.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could benefit from improved GUI features and enhanced orchestration capabilities. Additionally, optimization in handling complex environments would elevate its standing. AWS CodeDeploy could improve by providing more open-source integration options, enhancing multi-cloud support, and offering more comprehensive logging features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is versatile for deployment across various environments and is backed by comprehensive customer support. AWS CodeDeploy offers streamlined deployment processes, especially beneficial for AWS ecosystem workloads, and gains from integrated support with AWS services. Both provide strong customer service, but AWS CodeDeploy's deployment model is particularly efficient for AWS users.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is perceived to offer good ROI due to its flexible pricing structure and extensive support, which may lower the total cost of ownership. AWS CodeDeploy offers high ROI with its pay-as-you-go model, notably for existing AWS infrastructure users, and is generally seen as cost-effective within AWS frameworks, despite possible additional costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy

Ranking in Release Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ansible Automation ...

Ranking in Release Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 2.4%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 5.1%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Antony Kilament Raj

AWS Devops Engineer at CX Consultic

The default settings of AWS CodeDeploy are highly beneficial for my deployment workflows

There aren’t many improvements that can be made. In one of my projects, I initially didn't implement CodeDeploy directly. Instead, I stored my private key in Secret Manager and integrated it with my build spec to seamlessly work with GCP's Cloud Build. However, after using CodeDeploy, I haven't encountered any significant issues or areas that urgently need improvement. Overall, I'm quite satisfied with the features and functionality of AWS CodeDeploy.

Read full review

Surya Chapagain

Senior System Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Easy to manage and simple to learn

We use Red Hat a lot. I open tickets for the Red Hat cases, however, with Ansible, I haven't opened any cases. My manager worked with them a bit. If we have a problem with some file and we need to get Red Hat to analyze the issue and the file is 100GBs, we'll have an issue since we need to provide a log file for them to analyze. If it is around 12GB or 13GB, we can easily upload it to the Red Hat portal. With more than 100GBs, it will fail. I heard it should cover up to 250GB for an upload, however, I find it fails. Therefore, Red Hat needs to provide a way to handle this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's just like every other AWS resource I use. It gets the job done."

"CodeDeploy is very stable. I rate it a 10 for stability."

"AWS CodeDeploy operates on an on-demand basis. This means that you only pay for the exact duration of the deployment process. Whether it takes one minute, two minutes, or even longer, you're only charged for the time it takes to complete the deployment. You're not locked into paying for dedicated servers."

"I appreciate the feature for automating the deployment of code to the server."

"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."

"The product is easy to use."

"I found the default settings of AWS CodeDeploy to be highly beneficial for my deployment workflows. For instance, when deploying a Node.js application, I manually installed the necessary components on my AWS instance, such as the web server required by developers. Then, I created deployment scripts for starting and stopping instances and performing the deployment itself. These scripts were stored alongside my code in GitHub, ensuring they executed seamlessly with the CI/CD pipeline. Since the project wasn't overly complex, I opted for the default settings, which proved to be efficient and straightforward for deployment."

"Customer service was very helpful."

More AWS CodeDeploy pros

"It increases our company's efficiency, automating all the simple tasks which used to take hours of somebody's time."

"It is very easy to use, and there is less room for error."

"Being a game-changer in configuration management software is what has made Ansible so popular and widespread. Much of IT is based on SSH direct connectivity with a need for running infrastructure in an agentless way, and that has been a big plus. SSH has become a great security standard for managing servers. The whole thing has really become an out-of-the-box solution for managing a Unix estate."

"There are new modules available, which help to simplify the workflow. That is what we like about it."

"The Organizations feature, where I can give clear silos and hand them over to different teams, that's amazing; everybody says that it's their own Tower. It's like they have their own Tower out there."

"The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors."

"The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."

"We can manage all the configuration consistency between all our servers."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros

Cons

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."

"There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment."

"Improvements could be made to AWS CodeDeploy in terms of its agent's compatibility across different operating systems. Currently, there are instances where the agent may not work seamlessly with certain integrations, leading to issues with registering protocols on authorized servers."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."

"Deployment and stability should be improved."

"We have faced some issues and bugs along the way when it comes to stability."

"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."

More AWS CodeDeploy cons

"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."

"The tool should allow us to create infrastructure. It has everything when it comes to management, but it lacks the provisioning aspect."

"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."

"The communication on it is not probably where it could be. We could use some real life examples where we could point customers to them and say, "This is what you are trying to do. If you follow these steps, it would at least get you started a bit quicker.""

"The solution must be made easier to configure."

"One problem that I'm facing right now is the mismatch between the new version of Python and Ansible. Sometimes it's Python 2, and sometimes it's Python 3. When things get a bit dicey, I wish that Ansible would solve this issue by itself. I don't want to have to specify if it is Python 3 or version 2."

"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."

"The SSM connection access needs improvement"

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."

"It is costly."

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."

"The product's price is normal."

"The product is free with EC2."

"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."

"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."

"The cost is high, but it still works well."

"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."

"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution."

"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."

"The pricing is okay."

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

32%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?

Automation of Deployments

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?

AWS CodeDeploy is a fair value for money, with pricing rated as a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?

My primary use case is for deploying work that I have done on the server. I have created YAML files that are in the local code, which automatically run to perform deployment into AWS via GitHub. Se...

See all answers

What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?

Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?

The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 52% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 13% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 9% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

February 2025

Download AWS CodeDeploy product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

February 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report

Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ansible

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform include:

Maximum benefit for reduced overhead. Ansible Automation Platform is an all-in-one solution that can enable users to do the jobs of multiple products with one. Users do not need to purchase multiple products to handle their network automation and application development needs. It is equipped with prefabricated content from more than one hundred companies that are partnered with it.

Scalable. Ansible Automation Platform is a highly scalable solution. It can easily be scaled up so that automations can be extended across the various devices that make up an organization’s network.

Flexibility. Ansible Automation Platform is highly flexible. It enables users to tackle any and all automation-related tasks.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Features

Automation analytics. Ansible Automation Platform comes equipped with an automation analytics feature. This feature enables organizations to measure the effects of their automations and plan how they are going to implement automations moving forward. It makes it easy for administrators to spot anomalies in their automations and resolve them before they can escalate and become major issues.

Integration suite. Ansible Automation Platform gives organizations access to a wide variety of integrations that enable them to connect to Ansible’s partners. Now users can augment their capabilities without needing to purchase additional solutions that will enable them to run features that are not normally a part of Ansible’s array of tools. The Ansible environment is built to handle the wide variety of integrations that their partners offer. In order to accomplish this it includes the APIs that users need in order to fully benefit from the integrations.

Centralized interface. Ansible Automation Platform comes with a centralized GUI interface that enables users to manage all of their network automation and application creation activities from a single location. Businesses can guarantee that their operations are going to be handled efficiently and according to a single standard. The management process is greatly simplified. All of the tools that users need are located in one place.

Reviews from Real Users

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its automation manager and its comprehensive centralized GUI-based management interface.

MD J., a solution architect at STBL, says, “The automation manager is very good and makes things easier for customers with multi-cloud platforms.”

Aankit G., a Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS, writes, “We like the GUI-based interface for the tower. Before, we only had a command-line interface to run all the Ansible tasks. Now, the Ansible tower provides the complete GUI functionality to run, manage, and create the templates and the Ansible jobs. This includes the code and YAML file we can create. The GUI interface is the added advantage of this solution, including some integration with the different plugins.”

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

January 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.