Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodeDeploy vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.5% mindshare in RA, compared to Red Hat’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
AWS CodeDeploy
Read 13 AWS CodeDeploy reviews
  • 1,091 Views
  • 933 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 69 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 2,163 Views
  • 1,462 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and AWS CodeDeploy are competitive solutions in IT automation and deployment. While Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform showcases advantages in pricing and support, AWS CodeDeploy stands out with its comprehensive feature set, balancing performance and value.

Features: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers robust integration options, comprehensive automation capabilities, and open-source flexibility, providing users with extensive customization. AWS CodeDeploy excels at seamless deployment automation within AWS environments and tight integration with AWS services, making it a strong choice for scalability. It has an enhanced feature set for cloud-native environments.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform could benefit from improved GUI features and enhanced orchestration capabilities. Additionally, optimization in handling complex environments would elevate its standing. AWS CodeDeploy could improve by providing more open-source integration options, enhancing multi-cloud support, and offering more comprehensive logging features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is versatile for deployment across various environments and is backed by comprehensive customer support. AWS CodeDeploy offers streamlined deployment processes, especially beneficial for AWS ecosystem workloads, and gains from integrated support with AWS services. Both provide strong customer service, but AWS CodeDeploy's deployment model is particularly efficient for AWS users.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is perceived to offer good ROI due to its flexible pricing structure and extensive support, which may lower the total cost of ownership. AWS CodeDeploy offers high ROI with its pay-as-you-go model, notably for existing AWS infrastructure users, and is generally seen as cost-effective within AWS frameworks, despite possible additional costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,651 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeDeploy
Ranking in Release Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Release Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (1st), Network Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeDeploy is 2.5%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 5.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Release Automation
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadBilal7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective communication with seamless integration improves deployment but tool diversity raises usability questions
There are many tools in the market that cover different aspects, such as the GitOps methodology of deployment. I have not used CodeDeploy with EKS, although I have used it with ECS. I am not sure if CodeDeploy can be used with EKS, and I see this as a deficiency for end users. Easier implementation would be beneficial.
Read full review
Surya Chapagain - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to manage and simple to learn
We use Red Hat a lot. I open tickets for the Red Hat cases, however, with Ansible, I haven't opened any cases. My manager worked with them a bit. If we have a problem with some file and we need to get Red Hat to analyze the issue and the file is 100GBs, we'll have an issue since we need to provide a log file for them to analyze. If it is around 12GB or 13GB, we can easily upload it to the Red Hat portal. With more than 100GBs, it will fail. I heard it should cover up to 250GB for an upload, however, I find it fails. Therefore, Red Hat needs to provide a way to handle this.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest feature of AWS CodeDeploy is its scalability."
"CodeDeploy is quite easy to use within the AWS ecosystem."
"It's just like every other AWS resource I use. It gets the job done."
"The product is easy to use."
"I found the default settings of AWS CodeDeploy to be highly beneficial for my deployment workflows. For instance, when deploying a Node.js application, I manually installed the necessary components on my AWS instance, such as the web server required by developers. Then, I created deployment scripts for starting and stopping instances and performing the deployment itself. These scripts were stored alongside my code in GitHub, ensuring they executed seamlessly with the CI/CD pipeline. Since the project wasn't overly complex, I opted for the default settings, which proved to be efficient and straightforward for deployment."
"You can easily integrate AWS CodeDeploy with multiple services."
"The most valuable features of AWS CodeDeploy are its integration with other AWS services to deploy applications."
"I appreciate the feature for automating the deployment of code to the server."
More AWS CodeDeploy pros
"It is all modular-based. If there is not a module for it today, someone will write it."
"Installing it is a PIP command. So, it's pretty easy. It is a one liner."
"I like the inventory management. It's a very nice, simple, concise way to keep all that data together. And the API allows us to use it even for things that are not Ansible."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its configuration management, drift management, workflow templates with the visual UI, and graphical workflow representation."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valuable due to the simplicity of the YAML language."
"I like the fact that Ansible is agentless."
"It is quick to production. It has an API in the back which allows for integrations."
"RBAC is great around Organizations and I can use that backend as our lab. Ingesting stuff into the JSON logs, into any sort of logging collector; it works with Splunk and there are other collectors as well. It supports Sumo and that helps, I can go create reports in Sumo Logic. Workflows are an interesting feature. I can collect a lot of templates and create a workflow out of them."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
 

Cons

"The support and those things are lacking compared to others."
"AWS should provide its own templates in the console so that I don't need to go anywhere else to get the template for AWS CodeDeploy or AWS CodeBuild."
"I faced some stability issues."
"An improvement for the end users would be easier implementation, especially regarding local testing tools for deployment."
"We have faced some issues and bugs along the way when it comes to stability."
"The documentation could be more detailed, especially for new users."
"Deployment and stability should be improved."
"There will always be room for improvement, however, I cannot think of any specific improvements at the moment."
More AWS CodeDeploy cons
"When you set up Playbooks, I may have one version of the Playbook, but another member of the team may have a different vision, and we will not know which version is correct. We want to have one central repository for managing the different versions of Playbooks, so we can have better collaboration among team members. This is our use case for using Git version control."
"Networking needs to be improved."
"The solution requires some Linux knowledge."
"The communication on it is not probably where it could be. We could use some real life examples where we could point customers to them and say, "This is what you are trying to do. If you follow these steps, it would at least get you started a bit quicker.""
"More library support for microservices architecture and Kubernetes would be helpful."
"There should be consistency. I know that it is always changing, but when we are trying to get some users to do something in basic Ansible that they are not really interested in doing but their job requires them to do it, they start finding inconsistencies."
"There is always room for improvement in features or customer support."
"There are challenges in using the graphical interface, particularly in open-source versions."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeDeploy has proven to be a cost-effective solution for us, especially considering the benefits we gain from using it. In terms of pricing, AWS is quite affordable, providing excellent value for the features and services it offers."
"The product's price is normal."
"The product is free with EC2."
"Since we are using a dedicated AWS environment, the solution's pricing is fine."
"It is costly."
"Customers need to pay yearly for the license."
"We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."
"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."
"We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."
"Ansible is a lot more competitive than any of the others. Its setup was also straightforward. In fact, we just implemented Ansible on OpenShift, so that is how we are running the Ansible Automation Platform now."
"It is a little pricey but it is affordable. It is not that bad."
"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
32%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeDeploy?
Automation of Deployments
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeDeploy?
Evaluating cost, it is important to note that the services provided by CodeDeploy can be expensive to purchase from other cloud platforms. However, depending on the services, it might be worth the ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for AWS CodeDeploy?
I remember it was a Node.js API that I deployed to some EC2 instances. I was trying to use PM2, a process manager, to deploy the application to the end users.
See all answers
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management have been outstanding. If you have a large environment, patching systems is much ...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy Logo
AWS Amplify vs AWS CodeDeploy
Compared 55% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs AWS CodeDeploy
Compared 16% of the time
UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy Logo
UrbanCode Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy
Compared 11% of the time
Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy Logo
Octopus Deploy vs AWS CodeDeploy
Compared 11% of the time
Spinnaker vs AWS CodeDeploy Logo
Spinnaker vs AWS CodeDeploy
Compared 7% of the time
More AWS CodeDeploy Competitors
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 15% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 6% of the time
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2025
AWS CodeDeploy reportDownload AWS CodeDeploy product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
March 2025
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ansible
 

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to any instance, including Amazon EC2 instances and instances running on-premises. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications. You can use AWS CodeDeploy to automate deployments, eliminating the need for error-prone manual operations, and the service scales with your infrastructure so you can easily deploy to one instance or thousands.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform include:


  • Maximum benefit for reduced overhead. Ansible Automation Platform is an all-in-one solution that can enable users to do the jobs of multiple products with one. Users do not need to purchase multiple products to handle their network automation and application development needs. It is equipped with prefabricated content from more than one hundred companies that are partnered with it.


  • Scalable. Ansible Automation Platform is a highly scalable solution. It can easily be scaled up so that automations can be extended across the various devices that make up an organization’s network.


  • Flexibility. Ansible Automation Platform is highly flexible. It enables users to tackle any and all automation-related tasks.


Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Features


  • Automation analytics. Ansible Automation Platform comes equipped with an automation analytics feature. This feature enables organizations to measure the effects of their automations and plan how they are going to implement automations moving forward. It makes it easy for administrators to spot anomalies in their automations and resolve them before they can escalate and become major issues.


  • Integration suite. Ansible Automation Platform gives organizations access to a wide variety of integrations that enable them to connect to Ansible’s partners. Now users can augment their capabilities without needing to purchase additional solutions that will enable them to run features that are not normally a part of Ansible’s array of tools. The Ansible environment is built to handle the wide variety of integrations that their partners offer. In order to accomplish this it includes the APIs that users need in order to fully benefit from the integrations. 


  • Centralized interface. Ansible Automation Platform comes with a centralized GUI interface that enables users to manage all of their network automation and application creation activities from a single location. Businesses can guarantee that their operations are going to be handled efficiently and according to a single standard. The management process is greatly simplified. All of the tools that users need are located in one place.


Reviews from Real Users

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its automation manager and its comprehensive centralized GUI-based management interface.

MD J., a solution architect at STBL, says, “The automation manager is very good and makes things easier for customers with multi-cloud platforms.”

Aankit G., a Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS, writes, “We like the GUI-based interface for the tower. Before, we only had a command-line interface to run all the Ansible tasks. Now, the Ansible tower provides the complete GUI functionality to run, manage, and create the templates and the Ansible jobs. This includes the code and YAML file we can create. The GUI interface is the added advantage of this solution, including some integration with the different plugins.”

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Buyer's Guide
AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
March 2025
Free Report: AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS CodeDeploy vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.
See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.