Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Configuration Management category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Microsoft holds a 12.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 17.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Microsoft Intune
Read 263 Microsoft Intune reviews
  • 4,210 Views
  • 3,212 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 81 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 5,474 Views
  • 4,348 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 69 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 8,542 Views
  • 5,947 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform compete in the IT infrastructure management category. Based on the analysis, Ansible seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and agentless architecture, which suits diverse environments.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in patch management, remote control, and centralized application deployment, offering a comprehensive console for IT operations. It delivers robust reporting and inventory management, aiding compliance and update integrity. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is known for its agentless architecture, ease of use, and straightforward YAML syntax. It supports automation across platforms with numerous modules, perfect for flexibility and scalability without needing installed agents.

Room for Improvement: SCCM users desire a simplified interface and better integration with non-Microsoft systems and multiple cloud platforms. High resource consumption and complex troubleshooting are noted concerns. Ansible users seek better GUI integration, improved documentation, and ease of use for those with limited scripting knowledge. Scalability and broader orchestration capabilities are seen as areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCCM is often deployed in on-premises settings but is exploring hybrid and cloud capabilities. It offers reliable technical support, though responsiveness varies. Ansible offers flexibility across hybrid, public, and private clouds. Its open-source nature ensures broad community support and documentation, with occasional challenges in commercial support due to rapid module updates.

Pricing and ROI: SCCM licensing can be expensive for large enterprises with extensive configurations but is justified by its comprehensive feature set that enhances automation efficiency and productivity. Ansible provides a cost-effective open-source model, with optional enterprise features through Red Hat. Organizations find the ROI attractive due to reduced manual efforts and increased operational consistency, although expanding capabilities might incur extra costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
263
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Configuration Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (6th), Patch Management (1st)
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Network Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 10.3%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 12.5%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 17.4%, down from 18.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Joseph Merusi - PeerSpot reviewer
Everything has worked better since we started using it
Sometimes the syncing is inconsistent. I'm confident that the devices are checking in every eight hours, but sometimes the devices aren't picking up the settings as quickly as I would expect. Some features haven't been updated in a while, and Microsoft doesn't seem interested in developing them. Unless you talk to an engineer, you don't know whether there will be an update. There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now. Some reporting areas still need development. For example, I noticed that the reporting for driver updates is still confusing.
Read full review
MikeNelson2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements
While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
Read full review
Surya Chapagain - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to manage and simple to learn
We use Red Hat a lot. I open tickets for the Red Hat cases, however, with Ansible, I haven't opened any cases. My manager worked with them a bit. If we have a problem with some file and we need to get Red Hat to analyze the issue and the file is 100GBs, we'll have an issue since we need to provide a log file for them to analyze. If it is around 12GB or 13GB, we can easily upload it to the Red Hat portal. With more than 100GBs, it will fail. I heard it should cover up to 250GB for an upload, however, I find it fails. Therefore, Red Hat needs to provide a way to handle this.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Users can make screenshots, and devices only need the minimal version of iOS."
"Microsoft Intune is easy to use, and it is able to enforce policies towards multiple devices. It is able to bring multiple classes of devices into the same security posture. I found that very useful."
"The navigation, the keys, and the settings are easy to find. It is easy to understand."
"These capabilities have made a significant impact in my work, providing a comprehensive view of all devices and features in a single platform."
"Microsoft Intune has helped us by improving our security posture, leading to fewer security problems, and helping us understand where we have issues."
"Intune makes our organization more secure and flexible."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"The main benefit for us with Microsoft Intune is centralized management of all devices, allowing us to apply one policy across the company from one location."
More Microsoft Intune pros
"You can remote control or RDP. That has been the most valuable because we can go into one console and can get to anything we want. Instead of going to all these different consoles, we centralized everything."
"The major features of this product are the reporting tools. The most valuable features are package deployment and application deployment. Security management is also good because any vulnerability will be identified, and you can fix it. It's the best tool because you never know what kind of client you will have. For example, you may have your offices in low bandwidth remote areas. But it's achievable because it accommodates the bandwidth that you have available. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is an excellent reporting tool for your environment. If you want to know the details about the hardware configuration, software configuration, what is causing a problem, or when a new feature update comes in for Windows, even that goes on SCCM itself. A lot of deployment stuff."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"I like its ease of use. It does what you need it to do, and it's a one-stop-shop for the company and for all your deployments. If you incorporate Intune into it, you can have both. You can bring your own devices and corporate devices, and everything runs out of SCCM and Intune."
"With the SCCM inventory, we found a lot of rogue applications. We were able to identify them, find out who was running them, and either put them on our application list or remove them."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability."
"The cloud account management is a valuable feature."
"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
"The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors."
"The playbooks and the code the solution uses are quite useful."
"Ansible provides great reliability when coupled with a versioning system (git). It helps providing predictability to the network by knowing exactly what's being pushed after validating it in production."
"It is agentless. I don't have to think about which client system my unit has understanding in or not, because I can execute from my system. It will go and configure it, and any module that it is looking for will be shipped out."
"I like being able to control multiple systems and push out updates quickly with just a couple of clicks of a button and commands. I like the automation because it is a time saver."
"It is very extensible. There are many plugins and modules out there that everybody helps create to interact with different cloud providers as well."
"The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete."
"I like the fact that Ansible is agentless."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
 

Cons

"The synchronization of devices takes a significant amount of time, between 15 minutes and two hours. Microsoft should work on reducing this sync time to improve efficiency."
"The technical support by Microsoft is not so good. We have to manage many things by ourselves and do not receive responses in a timely manner."
"The difficulty of the the roll out is surprisingly difficult considering this product is supposed to be an integrated part of the 365 suite."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"Intune's reporting and logging could be improved. When troubleshooting, it's difficult to collect the logs and determine what's happening. If I want to filter out the compliant devices, I can see it from the logs, but I would like the option to drill down further."
"Regarding mobile devices, Intune is good, but there are other services that I would say are ahead of Intune from an administration and reporting point of view."
More Microsoft Intune cons
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"It would be better if automation options were available. For example, in Nexthink or SysTrack, there is an analytical tool. Creating dashboards would be very easy if you implement the same thing in Microsoft. That report will be a daily cost to the customers and good revenue for our organization. The price also could be better. In the next release, we need to include some features like tables, dashboards, surveys, services, and metrics in the dashboard. Whatever we are implementing will be downloaded by a report. Apart from the report, we will telecast from the dashboard. It's very easy to compare, and it will be easy to telecast to the end-users."
"There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself. However, it does seem a bit buggy from time to time, based on what I have heard."
"It would be of benefit if Configuration Manager could be connected/integrated with multiple Microsoft Intune subscriptions rather than just one (the current limit)."
"One area of improvement is regarding the patching of Office 365 products. We have some difficulties on this side, and it can be improved."
"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."
"The analysis is something that can be integrated. Their report analysis can be improved a little bit due to the fact that most of the time complaints policies are saved by the admins. It's something that we need to look into and search for."
"Initial setup was complex. There's a lot that goes into it."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
"We are not using the Dashboard a lot because we have higher expectations from it. The default Dashboard from Tower doesn't give that much information. We really want to get down into more than if the job succeeded or what was the percentage of success. We want to get down to task-level success. If, in a job, there are ten tasks, we want to see this task was a success, and this was not, and how many were not. That's the kind of granularity we are looking for, that Tower does not give right now."
"There are challenges in using the graphical interface, particularly in open-source versions."
"The governance features could be improved."
"Performance has been an issue on larger environments, but it has gotten a lot better over the past two years."
"For Ansible Tower, there are three tiers with ten nodes. I would like them to expand those ten nodes to 20, because ten nodes is not enough to test on."
"We are very satisfied with what we have. From a management point of view, whatever makes it easier for my team to help customers write their own playbooks would be something very beneficial. Everything is going as a service. Creating playbooks can become much more consumer-oriented so that customers do not need to contact us to write their own playbooks."
"Some of the modules in Ansible could be a bit more mature. There is still a little room for further development. Some performance aspects could be improved, perhaps in the form of parallelism within Ansible."
"There have been some differences between the operating systems that we have noticed. It could be down to cryptographic policies, but we have noticed some speed issues. They should work on the speed of deployment on different operating systems."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The overall pricing of Microsoft Intune is good for companies that have big IT budgets, 3,000 or more users and devices."
"It's affordable. In comparison to the competitors, the price depends on what features you need from Intune, but it's affordable. There are no hidden costs, but there are some features that go for a premium price. Those are the add-ons for which you have to pay extra."
"I recently got to know that the AD P1 license is compulsory to use Intune Autopilot, which was surprising for me. Earlier, this was not the case. It is the wrong thing to do. We now need to purchase AD P1 licenses for us and for our customers. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing."
"We don't pay for Intune because it is bundled with the premium subscription to Office 365. It includes Intune and Defender. I don't have to buy two extra products to manage my enterprise."
"There is a license required to use this solution. However, it was part of a bundle package. Microsoft Intune is far less expensive than other solutions, such as Workspace ONE."
"Intune's pricing is reasonable considering its benefits and the high costs it helps avoid."
"It's reasonable. They're not giving it away, but it's reasonable."
"I am satisfied with the pricing."
More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice
"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."
"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."
"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"There is not a license needed to use the solution."
"For enterprises, there is an annual license required to use this solution. The price of the solution could be cheaper. However, this is mostly because of the exchange rate from the dollar to the Nigerian currency."
"We have to pay for a license."
"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features."
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints."
"The pricing is okay."
"The pricing for us is huge because we use twenty thousand nodes, so that is a huge infrastructure, but if someone is using a small infrastructure, then the pricing is not so much."
"Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node."
"We use the open-source version of the solution."
"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."
"Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
28%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
See all answers
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
See all answers
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that ...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. Wh...
See all answers
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages effi...
See all answers
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management h...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
I know Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform costs money since I am using a trial license. The pricing is high, and sin...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 13% of the time
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 8% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Intune Competitors
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 12% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
AWS Systems Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 5% of the time
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 2% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 8% of the time
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 5% of the time
BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 5% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Intune
April 2025
Microsoft Intune reportDownload Microsoft Intune product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
April 2025
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
April 2025
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM )
Ansible
 

Overview

Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.

Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

  • Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft 365, Azure Active Directory, and System Center for streamlined management.
  • Conditional Access: Enhances security with policies that restrict access based on conditions.
  • Autopilot: Provides zero-touch deployment for setting up new devices efficiently.
  • Mobile Device Management: Enables control over both personal and corporate devices.
  • Application Deployment: Facilitates app delivery across a range of devices.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

  • Centralized Management: Reduces complexity by managing devices and applications in one place.
  • Security Enhancement: Protects data with features like remote wipe and compliance monitoring.
  • Improved Productivity: Enhances efficiency with seamless integration and automation features.
  • Device Scalability: Supports diverse device management for growing business needs.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.

Microsoft

Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.

New features of Configuration Manager, such as the support of Windows 10 in-place upgrade, co-management with Microsoft Intune, Windows 10 and Microsoft 365 Apps for enterprise Servicing Dashboard, integration with Windows Update for Business, and more make deploying and managing Windows easier than ever before.

Microsoft

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform include:


  • Maximum benefit for reduced overhead. Ansible Automation Platform is an all-in-one solution that can enable users to do the jobs of multiple products with one. Users do not need to purchase multiple products to handle their network automation and application development needs. It is equipped with prefabricated content from more than one hundred companies that are partnered with it.


  • Scalable. Ansible Automation Platform is a highly scalable solution. It can easily be scaled up so that automations can be extended across the various devices that make up an organization’s network.


  • Flexibility. Ansible Automation Platform is highly flexible. It enables users to tackle any and all automation-related tasks.


Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Features


  • Automation analytics. Ansible Automation Platform comes equipped with an automation analytics feature. This feature enables organizations to measure the effects of their automations and plan how they are going to implement automations moving forward. It makes it easy for administrators to spot anomalies in their automations and resolve them before they can escalate and become major issues.


  • Integration suite. Ansible Automation Platform gives organizations access to a wide variety of integrations that enable them to connect to Ansible’s partners. Now users can augment their capabilities without needing to purchase additional solutions that will enable them to run features that are not normally a part of Ansible’s array of tools. The Ansible environment is built to handle the wide variety of integrations that their partners offer. In order to accomplish this it includes the APIs that users need in order to fully benefit from the integrations. 


  • Centralized interface. Ansible Automation Platform comes with a centralized GUI interface that enables users to manage all of their network automation and application creation activities from a single location. Businesses can guarantee that their operations are going to be handled efficiently and according to a single standard. The management process is greatly simplified. All of the tools that users need are located in one place.


Reviews from Real Users

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its automation manager and its comprehensive centralized GUI-based management interface.

MD J., a solution architect at STBL, says, “The automation manager is very good and makes things easier for customers with multi-cloud platforms.”

Aankit G., a Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS, writes, “We like the GUI-based interface for the tower. Before, we only had a command-line interface to run all the Ansible tasks. Now, the Ansible tower provides the complete GUI functionality to run, manage, and create the templates and the Ansible jobs. This includes the code and YAML file we can create. The GUI interface is the added advantage of this solution, including some integration with the different plugins.”

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
April 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.