Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Control Tower vs Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Users quickly achieved ROI with IBM Turbonomic by optimizing resources, reducing costs, and improving performance and efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.9
AWS Control Tower boosts compliance and cost-efficiency, streamlines multi-account management, enhancing value over traditional data centers.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Enterprise Manager reduces costs, improves troubleshooting, supports testing, and optimizes operations, delivering substantial financial returns for companies.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.8
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control support generally receives positive feedback, despite some variability in response quality and knowledge depth.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
Sentiment score
7.9
AWS Control Tower offers scalable centralized management, aligns with diverse needs, and provides customization while efficiently managing multiple accounts.
Sentiment score
7.3
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is scalable, efficient with numerous nodes, but may face challenges in cluster setups.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.8
AWS Control Tower is stable and efficient, with occasional regional issues and disruptions, appreciated for managing multiple accounts.
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is stable and dependable, though performance can be impacted by latency and configuration needs.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control requires compatibility, support, interface improvements, better integration, security features, simpler setup, and pricing adjustments.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
AWS Control Tower pricing varies; it's cost-effective for some, but high in regions like Brazil, offering pay-as-you-go flexibility.
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is often free but add-ons can be costly; review Oracle's licensing for clarity.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
AWS Control Tower enhances compliance, security, and management with centralized authentication, automation, customization, scalability, and strong governance.
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control provides comprehensive real-time monitoring, optimization, and centralized management for databases and environments.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Management
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (5th)
AWS Control Tower
Ranking in Cloud Management
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Enterprise Manager C...
Ranking in Cloud Management
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 6.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Control Tower is 1.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is 1.1%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
AtemnkengNkeze - PeerSpot reviewer
A reliable option for setting up landing zones and single sign-on
You don't do anything when you set up these landing zones, such as the AWS Organization single sign-on. Everything is preconfigured, and you just have to do automation. Everything is established in the environment. If Control Tower could do this, it would be much better where all the security tools are already in it. I know AWS has its security tools, like Security Hub and Cloud Check, with minimal configuration. It would be much better if you set up the landing zone, which is the master account in the foundation of the environment, and all these tools are included. You should just get to go in and go, "Okay, I need this at this particular time." You should get to go in and do it. There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower.
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen
It is a highly scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. There are no issues once you install the application, and it works smoothly, meaning there are no issues related to onboarding the application according to a user's chosen profile. I have done the onboarding for more than 1,500 middleware products. There are different kinds of users of the product in our company, but the application itself has 1,500 middleware products. The solution is used on a daily basis, meaning it is used twenty-four hours and seven days a week. There are no plans to increase the use of the solution in our company.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
What do you like most about AWS Control Tower?
The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global comp...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Control Tower?
The product is very affordable. I rate the product’s pricing as two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expens...
What needs improvement with AWS Control Tower?
AWS should provide more resources, examples, and tutorials. Mastering the technology will be more wonderful, but it t...
What do you like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control?
The valuable feature is job scheduling. It manages the database's scheduling, history, and growth, helping monitor CP...
What needs improvement with Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control?
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control manages the monitoring and the graphs. Other tools complement the base monito...
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
No data available
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Grupo Aeromexico SAB de CV, Grupo Arcor, Australian Finance Group Ltd., Cerner Corp., Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Kovaion Consulting India Pvt. Ltd., Shelf Drilling Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.