AWS Device Farm vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 34.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

833 Views
379 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 110 Tricentis Tosca reviews

5,423 Views
3,088 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and AWS Device Farm are key players in software testing and quality assurance. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the edge with its robust automated testing capabilities for complex scenarios, while AWS Device Farm excels in device coverage due to its cloud-based infrastructure.

Features: Tricentis Tosca is recognized for its model-based test automation, effective test data management, and CI/CD integration, which cater to complex automation needs. AWS Device Farm offers extensive device and browser testing, parallel execution, and support for multiple scripting languages. Its strength is in providing access to a wide range of real devices for comprehensive testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca provides a comprehensive on-premises deployment model with personalized support during the setup process, though it may require more configuration. AWS Device Farm allows for quick deployment and scalability through its cloud-based nature, with integration into AWS environments and some automated support tools.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca may involve an initial investment, but its advanced capabilities can lead to a high return on investment in test automation efficiency. AWS Device Farm's pay-as-you-go model offers economical scalability suitable for variable testing needs, balancing costs with accessibility on a broad range of devices.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,335 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 34.8%, up from 32.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"The product enables codeless automation."

"It offers many features, such as risk-based testing and scenario creation using Kafka."

"Tosca can go through platforms to make end-to-end testing across CRM, billing, provisioning, order management flow, and databases to check for errors."

"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."

"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."

"I am impressed with the product's script test."

"I face no challenges or stability issues."

"Makes optimal use of Model-based Test practice in getting Object-references from the application."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."

"They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."

"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."

"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."

"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."

"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"It is expensive."

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."

"We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Device Farm?

I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Device Farm?

It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Device Farm?

We have used the solution for malware testing and APM.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 29% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.