AWS Device Farm vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and UiPath are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to UiPath’s 14.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

833 Views
379 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

1,471 Views
890 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Device Farm and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Mobile App Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Test Management Tools (7th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 2.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 14.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement

UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Device Farm?

I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Device Farm?

It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Device Farm?

We have used the solution for malware testing and APM.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 29% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 27% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2025

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

March 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.