Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft Azure comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure offers scalable solutions, cost savings in infrastructure, and business value, despite some high data costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
AWS support is helpful for deployment issues, but documentation and technical support experiences vary, with room for improvement.
Sentiment score
6.5
Microsoft Azure support quality varies with plan level; premium plans offer better service, while community resources are appreciated.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers scalable instance management, efficient auto-scaling, load balancing, and easy environment management, enhancing DevOps workflows.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure's scalability allows resource adjustments, benefiting businesses despite some cost concerns, with overall positive user experiences reported.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is highly regarded for its stability and reliability, rarely experiencing downtime or unexpected issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improved auto-scaling, better CloudFront integration, enhanced documentation, and automated updates for AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Microsoft Azure struggles with pricing, compatibility, user interface issues, and lacks integration, transparency, support, and seamless data security.
 

Setup Cost

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is free; users pay for associated services, generally considered cost-effective and affordable for short-term use.
Microsoft Azure offers flexible, competitive pricing but can be complex with variable charges affecting expense prediction for enterprise buyers.
 

Valuable Features

AWS Elastic Beanstalk simplifies log access, rollbacks, scaling, session management with RDS, and versioning for seamless application updates.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
312
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Hunaid Vekariya - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to add configuration files directly to repository, seamless management of rollbacks and simpler to use
From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk. Perhaps they're shifting their focus away from it. They've discontinued many features and are even recommending alternatives like EKS and other serverless services. I've also come across numerous questions online from people encountering issues with Elastic Beanstalk. It seems to be a common concern that AWS is no longer prioritizing Elastic Beanstalk. Instead, they appear to be concentrating on serverless offerings. While this may be disappointing for Elastic Beanstalk users, I believe it's a positive move. Serverless represents the future. AWS could consider adding more platforms as managed services within Elastic Beanstalk. Currently, they offer around five or six. However, since it already provides a Dockerized environment, you can essentially run any language you prefer. So, in my view, they pretty much have everything covered at the moment.
Nicolas Chabrier - PeerSpot reviewer
Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration
The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
44%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
AWS charges for support services, and the costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk can be high compared to on-premises or other cloud solutions like VMware.
What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs.
What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
My primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk is to train instructors in Pakistan, mainly focusing on services like S3, Amazon EC2, Elastic, Beanstalk, and LoadBalancer. I also use it when working ...
Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.