AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft Azure comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 15.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 11 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

689 Views
689 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Read 323 Microsoft Azure reviews

19,268 Views
11,175 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Microsoft Azure

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are key players in the cloud services market, each offering distinct advantages. Based on user feedback, Azure seems to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive security features and deployment flexibility, while Elastic Beanstalk is favored for its ease of use and efficient auto-scaling capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers a wide range of services and high scalability, making it ideal for complex data and security needs in large-scale operations. It is recognized for quick deployment and extensive integration options, along with robust security tools like Azure Defender and Sentinel. AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides ease of use, auto-scaling, and seamless application management, making it appreciated for its session management and flexible application updates.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure faces challenges with cost transparency and predicting pricing, which could be streamlined. It would benefit from better integration of features and improved third-party support. AWS Elastic Beanstalk could enhance its auto-scaling and CloudFront integration, as well as offer clearer documentation to improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure is noted for its smooth deployment and strong documentation, although technical support quality can vary and be costly. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is user-friendly, providing quick deployment, with technical support often relying on external resources for assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure's pricing is seen as high, with difficulties in cost prediction, yet users appreciate the ROI from infrastructure savings and operational efficiency. The OPEX model aids scalability. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a pay-as-you-go model considered reasonable for short-term projects, with its own service being free and charges only on associated resources, providing efficient resource management benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,333 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

323

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 15.2%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure	15.2%
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	0.9%
Other	83.9%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Harendra Sisodia

Business Analyst & Agile Strategist at Charles Schwab

Utilize auto-scaling and monitoring to efficiently manage application infrastructure

The key features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk include auto-scaling capabilities for applications experiencing traffic fluctuations, ensuring high availability and cost-effectiveness. AWS Elastic Beanstalk integrates with AWS CloudWatch to provide metrics like latency and CPU utilization, allowing easy monitoring of application performance. It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, supports multi-environment for different stages of the application lifecycle, and is cost-effective as you pay based on the resources launched.

Read full review

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."

"Elastic Beanstalk, based on my experience and recommendations from friends, is a good solution."

"Elastic Beanstalk simplifies deploying and managing applications."

"The feature I like most about Elastic Beanstalk is the way I do not have to do anything, just deploy my app."

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"Elastic Beanstalk helps reduce system administration as it automates many tasks."

"I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"It is stable and scalable."

"Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS."

"I come from the DBA side so for me it's the easy maintenance; backups are very easy as well."

"The most valuable features of the solution are for management, such as dashboards."

"I would definitely recommend Microsoft Azure as a platform to other businesses because of its cost effectiveness, scalability, the range of products, and ease of use."

"The platform as a service for MySQL and PostgreSQL have significantly improved our operational efficiency."

"Provides a high level of availability and 99% uptime."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the limitless possibilities of the infrastructure."

More Microsoft Azure pros

Cons

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part."

"Maybe the company could create more option packages, such as more bundles of configuration."

"One area where AWS Elastic Beanstalk struggles is with the complexity of deployments."

"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."

"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"Integration with more platforms needs improvement."

"You don't get support from Microsoft very easily as compared to other solutions."

"Microsoft Azure could improve by being more user-friendly and the interface could be better."

"The pricing could be better."

"The subscriptions are complicated."

"Dashboards and reporting could be improved."

"Integrate as a service. A lot of Microsoft software licensing options aren’t yet in Azure. Also, the ability to integrate with other technologies, such as other options on the market based on RISC Technologies."

"In the next release, I would like to see better security."

More Microsoft Azure cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are on an annual subscription. However, there are other options available."

"Microsoft Azure comes with a long-term license and trial licenses as well."

"I pay for a yearly subscription."

"There is a license for the solution."

"The cost could definitely be lower."

"All cloud services are expensive."

"Microsoft Azure is a cost-effective solution where you use it as per your requirement and pay for it."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

12%

University

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	53
Large Enterprise	150

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

AWS Elastic Beanstalk itself is free to use, but there are charges for other integrated services like RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ), ELBs, and EC2s. If only AWS Elastic Beanstalk is used, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I have used AWS Elastic Beanstalk ( /products/aws-elastic-beanstalk-reviews ) primarily to manage infrastructure. The main purpose is to offload the complexity of managing servers, operating system...

See all answers

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 22% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 19% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 12% of the time

Google Cloud vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 10% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

February 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Also Known As

No data available

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure

February 2026

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.