Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Microsoft Azure comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
312
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Hunaid Vekariya - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to add configuration files directly to repository, seamless management of rollbacks and simpler to use
From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk. Perhaps they're shifting their focus away from it. They've discontinued many features and are even recommending alternatives like EKS and other serverless services. I've also come across numerous questions online from people encountering issues with Elastic Beanstalk. It seems to be a common concern that AWS is no longer prioritizing Elastic Beanstalk. Instead, they appear to be concentrating on serverless offerings. While this may be disappointing for Elastic Beanstalk users, I believe it's a positive move. Serverless represents the future. AWS could consider adding more platforms as managed services within Elastic Beanstalk. Currently, they offer around five or six. However, since it already provides a Dockerized environment, you can essentially run any language you prefer. So, in my view, they pretty much have everything covered at the moment.
Nicolas Chabrier - PeerSpot reviewer
Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration
The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."
"One of the most valuable aspects is that developers can access logs directly. They can download them from the AWS console within Elastic Beanstalk."
"Elastic Beanstalk is very easy to use, providing infrastructure to deploy our third-party application to the cloud within 15 to 20 minutes."
"Elastic Beanstalk is very easy to use, providing infrastructure to deploy our third-party application to the cloud within 15 to 20 minutes."
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Beanstalk is its ease of use and management."
"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."
"The simplicity in the speed of provisioning users is what I like best about Elastic Beanstalk."
"The main benefit of Microsoft Azure is that it is cloud-based. We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for our code and it is tightly integrated with Microsoft Azure. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
"Azure Data Lake is useful. We are in the process of populating the data lake for our current project. Also, we are directly importing for Power BI to using PowerPlay."
"Provisioning a server is fast, taking only one or two minutes before it is ready."
"This product is quite easy to use and is available on-demand."
"Microsoft Azure has thousands of services and products."
"Azure is very user friendly. I was able to create some database servers really fast. The user interface is intuitive."
"We have implemented the ExpressRoute connection, which is an established circuit between the local provider and the Microsoft network edge."
"I get all the features under one roof."
 

Cons

"Maybe the company could create more option packages, such as more bundles of configuration."
"The documentation needs to be clearer, particularly relating to editing JSON files before uploading applications."
"AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs."
"Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."
"Sometimes there are issues when auto-scaling with CloudFront."
"From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk."
"The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."
"The documentation can be outdated and is not as clear in Microsoft Azure as it is in AWS or Google."
"I would prefer Microsoft Azure to increase the free trial, then developers can take advantage, and it could increase their sales."
"I think it would be good to keep making progress on giving users the ability to do action calls on Data Factory. Right now, it's mostly local. Perhaps Microsoft could add the ability to put some calls in the workflow."
"There is a need to be better on-premise solutions that are more helpful. However, I don't think that is the goal of Microsoft Azure. They want the solution to be secure cloud solutions with cloud applications. This is their main goal at the moment."
"Auto ML could be improved technically."
"The interface for configuring the environment is not very intuitive. Certain things are at different places, and it is not easy to navigate. They should have a more transparent licensing model. Currently, Microsoft's licensing is a bit clunky, and it keeps changing depending on the type of subscription you have. Different features are included, and sometimes, it is very hard to figure out the right licensing. So, the commercial aspect of the licensing can be improved, and they can make it easier to understand all the features that are included."
"Pricing is high if you plan to use it on a larger scale."
"The biggest area needing improvement involves the licensing cost."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I believe that we have a three-year license, and I'm happy with the pricing."
"It's a metered environment, and it's pay-as-you-go. That's the big challenge with a metered environment."
"Software licensing models can be expensive depending on what you need compared to open source solutions, for example. However, if you don't have the technical skills, you may be better off paying for a license and support instead of trying to use open source solutions."
"The cost of the solution could be reduced. However, I am using the free version."
"Customers pay for our software and use our solution as a service through monthly payments. They don't pay the licensing fee directly to Microsoft."
"The licensing price is fine."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Microsoft Azure is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
Sometimes it is difficult to use for the first time. The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement.
What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
I use AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying my web application on the cloud. I do so within the context of my project for my master's program.
Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.