AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Cohesity Data Cloud compete in disaster recovery and data management solutions. Cohesity Data Cloud holds the upper hand due to its superior features and data management capabilities.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides robust disaster recovery capabilities, scalability, and seamless integration with AWS services. Cohesity Data Cloud offers unified data management, backup, and recovery across multiple environments. Users find Cohesity's comprehensive data management more valuable.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery improve its failover processes, reporting tools, and overall user interface. Cohesity Data Cloud needs enhanced data migration features, better documentation, and streamlined user experience. Cohesity receives more feedback on enhancing its extensive features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for straightforward deployment within the AWS ecosystem, but customer service receives mixed reviews. Cohesity Data Cloud's deployment is slightly more complex, but users benefit from responsive and helpful customer support. Cohesity's customer service outshines AWS in user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is appreciated for its competitive pricing and effective ROI due to lower setup costs. Cohesity Data Cloud, despite higher setup costs, offers significant ROI through its advanced features and comprehensive data management capabilities. Users find Cohesity's ROI justified by its extensive benefits.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
If I find myself stuck in a cyber recovery situation, this tool can help me avoid spending my money on ransom payments.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
issues with Cohesity Data Cloud have not been encountered, suggesting a robust service.
Sometimes I face delays, which can be frustrating.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status.
The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth.
Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups.
Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes.
There is an additional cost for infrastructure, which I need to provide.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service is a native service, integration is seamless.
It replicates data to the cloud in a tamper-proof manner, offering protection against ransomware attacks since it is not under administrative control.
They have a feature called DataSock, which enhances data protection.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
