Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
10.0
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for effective support, quick response times, and high customer satisfaction, despite lacking ticketing.
Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft support receives mixed reviews, praised for knowledge and efficiency, but criticized for slow responses and complex processes.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs better automation, usability, cost efficiency, and AI-driven features for improved functionality and security.
Sentiment score
4.7
Azure Site Recovery needs improvements in replication, integration, security, scalability, deployment, APIs, automation, and customer support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery scales efficiently, rated highly for ease of use and flexibility with seamless upgrades and visual reporting.
Sentiment score
7.3
Azure Site Recovery efficiently handles scalability across business sizes, despite some regional challenges, with generally high user ratings.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing is fair but can be expensive, with varied costs and potential discounts for long-term deals.
Sentiment score
7.0
Azure Site Recovery costs vary widely, influenced by consumption, storage, and licensing, affecting user affordability and billing clarity.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable, with minor issues like server lag and occasional replication lag, rated 8-9 out of 10.
Sentiment score
8.5
Azure Site Recovery is highly stable and reliable, with minor transition issues noted by some users.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is valued for its replication, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use for critical workloads.
Sentiment score
8.4
Azure Site Recovery is praised for its easy setup, scalability, cost efficiency, and seamless integration with existing systems.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (30th), Cloud Backup (20th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (16th)
Azure Site Recovery
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Duy AnhMai - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud-based solution enhances company backup but comes with high costs
We are using AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for backup purposes in our company AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is convenient because it is cloud-based technology. The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based. The cost of…
Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time
Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
The pricing of AWS is considered expensive compared to other options.
What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive.
What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?
Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?
It can incorporate features related to monitoring the site to streamline the process. Personally, I often use automation for efficiency. This reduces dependency on support for those solutions, espe...
 

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks
Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.