Azure Site Recovery and VMware Live Recovery are both key players in the disaster recovery solutions category. VMware Live Recovery seems to have an advantage due to its robust enterprise features, although Azure Site Recovery provides solid integration within the Azure ecosystem, catering well to users already invested in Azure services.
Features: Azure Site Recovery is popular for automating processes and easy integration with Azure services. It offers failover capabilities and automated synchronization. VMware Live Recovery excels in automation, integrates comprehensively with storage vendors, and provides flexibility in disaster recovery scenarios.
Room for Improvement: Azure Site Recovery users highlight the need for better pricing models, improved support, and enhanced automation features. Additional error logging and broader platform integration are desired. VMware Live Recovery could benefit from improved cost predictability, enhanced scalability, better replication speed, and improved licensing clarity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure provides various deployment options, including Public and Hybrid Cloud configurations, with mixed reviews on support response times. VMware Live Recovery requires strong in-house infrastructure and offers competent customer support, although response times could be quicker.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery is cost-effective for cloud-centric operations, but cost fluctuations due to consumption are noted. In contrast, VMware Live Recovery's enterprise focus results in higher upfront costs which are offset by advanced features and automation. Both aim to streamline processes and justify their costs through efficiency and time savings.
Azure Site Recovery, while being pricier than some providers, has a sufficient service level to justify costs.
Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.
Issues frequently require escalation.
We primarily rely on our Cloud Support Partner for support.
They are knowledgeable.
The technical support from VMware is very good and operates based on a service level.
Azure Site Recovery is a very scalable product and service mechanism.
I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.
There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages.
Moreover, it does not support services like AppConfig or App Services.
It's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production.
I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring.
The licensing area needs improvement as the cost per virtual machine is high.
The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective.
Previously, when acquiring a license for Ethiopian drug supply chains, the price was significantly high, especially after Broadcom joined VMware.
For cloud-based solutions, the cost seems quite pricey, so we stick to on-premises deployment.
Azure provides a 99.99% SLA for their uptime, ensuring that even during outages due to patch releases, there is no data loss, merely hindered accessibility.
Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.
It is used for data replication between data centers and allows for quick response in times of failure, ensuring data availability.
The solution offers a rich set of features, well adapted in the market.
The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us.
Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
