Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Microsoft and VMware are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while VMware is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 21 Azure Site Recovery reviews

1,313 Views
1,016 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 77 VMware Live Recovery reviews

1,656 Views
1,219 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Azure Site Recovery and VMware Live Recovery compete in the disaster recovery market. Azure Site Recovery appeals with integrated cloud solutions and cost-effective pricing, while VMware Live Recovery stands out with robust on-premise features and greater reliability.

Features: Azure Site Recovery integrates seamlessly with Azure cloud services, enabling real-time failover and simplified management. VMware Live Recovery is known for comprehensive backup capabilities and high reliability in on-premise environments, making it suitable for local recovery needs.

Room for Improvement: Azure Site Recovery could enhance on-premise support options and increase customization of recovery plans. Additional offline support would also be beneficial. VMware Live Recovery might improve by offering more cost-effective pricing models, streamlining setup processes, and expanding its hybrid cloud capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery offers an efficient setup with tight Azure ecosystem integration, making it swift for cloud contexts. However, VMware Live Recovery provides comprehensive support for complex systems, appealing to those with extensive VMware implementations but can present a steeper learning curve initially.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery generally presents a budget-friendly model with scalable cloud-cost efficiency, offering better ROI for cloud-centered setups. VMware Live Recovery's upfront costs may be higher, but its returns in complex, on-premise environments justify the expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (5th)

Featured Reviews

Mike Douthitt

Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net

Jan 26, 2024

Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time

Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Apr 30, 2024

Offers simplified management and automated recovery process, which reduces the need for manual intervention during a disaster

Automated recovery is one good feature, SRM also offers simplified management. It has a centralized interface for configuring, testing, and executing disaster recovery plans across multiple sites. This means management from a single point, even for many sites. Recovery plans can be different for customers. So, another important feature is the policy-based protection within SRM. Recovery plans can be customized based on business requirements, including Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). These objectives might differ between industries – healthcare might need a more aggressive RPO, for instance. Additionally, SRM offers failback capabilities and reporting features for compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."

"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."

"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."

"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."

"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."

"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."

"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."

More Azure Site Recovery pros

"I would rate the ease of setting up and configuring my recovery plan in VMware SRM, a ten out of ten, with ten being the easiest."

"The replication is the solution's most valuable feature. If we have some issues on the VM in the main site we can migrate it to another site automatically."

"Our systems fail over using SRM. So, we do a big bang DR, which is biannual, and we fail over our fairly massive Epic electronic health record (EHR) and our core applications. It takes us about 30 minutes to fail over using SRM, which is pretty good. In most hospitals that have Epic installed, Epic does the audit to make sure that we can fail over if something were to happen. Normally, sites will have a DR solution specific to the EHR, but right now, our pain point is the third-party tier-one clinical applications."

"Incorporating non-disruptive testing capability in disaster recovery procedures has significantly benefited the overall recovery testing processes."

"The simplicity of VMware SRM is one of its most important features. SRM console is straightforward to manage. It offers simplicity in monitoring, managing, and deploying, making it a unique value proposition. Additionally, Nutanix solutions also provide a simple GUI, which helps in operational efficiency."

"The most valuable feature of VMware SRM is its integration with the VMware platform."

"The initial setup is easy depending on the environment you are working with."

"The solution helps to improve business continuity processes. Its automatic failover and failback policies have been wonderful."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."

"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."

"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."

"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."

"I would like to see more security features."

"we lack a straightforward method to automate the restart of services, which can be quite time-consuming."

"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."

More Azure Site Recovery cons

"SRM may hit some OS issues related to IP changes, but they are usually OS related, especially in the 2008 realm."

"The two vCenters have to be synchronized, which sometimes gives us problems because Keberos does not tolerate more than five minutes in time difference."

"You cannot use VMware SRM in conjunction with storage replication software."

"I would like to see this solution be more scalable."

"You need a lot of knowledge to work with the interface because it is not really easy to use, and it would be great if the dashboard were simplified."

"There needs to be better stability during heavy capacity in future releases."

"Timing issues arise due to replication lags in multiple areas. When this happens, we encounter errors."

"VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery could improve by enhancing the network bandwidth from the storage."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

"Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."

"The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."

"They have a license to pay."

"I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."

"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"VMware sells in bundles of 50 VMs, so if we want to expand, we have to buy the whole bundle."

"Licensing costs explode after 75 VMs."

"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."

"I would say VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is very expensive in comparison with other available virtualization solutions."

"VMware SRM is a little bit pricey."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for VMware SRM, which is not very expensive."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

"The cost of SRM is a little bit high, especially for smaller companies."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Site Recovery?

Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

It is cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

It can incorporate features related to monitoring the site to streamline the process. Personally, I often use automation for efficiency. This reduces dependency on support for those solutions, espe...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Mature products like VMware SRM often have higher costs. Their capabilities are extensive, but the licensing model can be complex.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

While there are no major drawbacks, some potential improvements could address complexities in implementing and maintaining SRM. The cost can be significant, and there's a resource overhead – meanin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 20% of the time

Zerto vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 25% of the time

Zerto vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

November 2024

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

October 2024

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Learn More

Microsoft

VMware

Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

October 2024

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.