Azure Site Recovery and VMware Live Recovery are prominent disaster recovery solutions. Azure has an edge with its cost-saving integration within the Azure ecosystem, while VMware is recognized for its advanced recovery features and comprehensive options.
Features: Azure Site Recovery is praised for its user-friendly configuration, seamless data recovery, and automated file synchronization. It integrates effortlessly within Azure, making it optimal for cost-saving and load-balancing. VMware Live Recovery is known for robust automation, array-based integration, and sophisticated disaster recovery testing, offering enterprise-grade features like advanced reporting and replication.
Room for Improvement: Azure Site Recovery can enhance error logging, pricing predictability, and support for additional services like App Services. Improvements in hypervisor support and backup features are also desired. VMware Live Recovery faces criticism for high costs, configuration complexity, and limited platform support outside VMware environments. It could benefit from enhancements in automation, reporting, and troubleshooting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Site Recovery is optimal for cloud deployment with its flexibility in public and hybrid cloud options, though users have mixed experiences with Microsoft's technical support. VMware Live Recovery primarily operates on-premises, with limited cloud integration and technical support often requiring experienced personnel.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Site Recovery offers cost-effectiveness and substantial ROI through consumption-based licensing, demonstrating significant cost savings over building additional data centers. VMware Live Recovery has higher pricing, which can be limiting for smaller enterprises but is justified by its extensive features for larger organizations. Azure's cost benefits make it the more accessible option.
Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.
We primarily rely on our Cloud Support Partner for support.
They are knowledgeable.
I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.
Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options.
It's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production.
I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring.
For cloud-based solutions, the cost seems quite pricey, so we stick to on-premises deployment.
Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.
The solution offers a rich set of features, well adapted in the market.
The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us.
Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
