Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Nutanix and VMware are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Nutanix is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.3, while VMware is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Read 7 Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews

669 Views
533 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 79 VMware Live Recovery reviews

1,499 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 14, 2024

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service and VMware Live Recovery compete in the business continuity category. VMware is perceived as superior due to its advanced features and capabilities.

Features: Nutanix offers seamless integration with existing cloud ecosystems, automated failover, and simplicity, making it cost-efficient. VMware Live Recovery provides advanced recovery options, real-time data synchronization, and high customization, catering to complex disaster recovery needs.

Room for Improvement: Nutanix could improve its feature set to compete with more comprehensive solutions. Customization options for complex environments may enhance user experience. Greater automation in recovery processes would be beneficial. VMware could simplify its deployment process to reduce setup complexities. Streamlining real-time data synchronization for faster performance is an area for improvement. Enhancing cost-effectiveness without sacrificing features could attract more customers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix emphasizes streamlined deployment with native cloud integration and provides efficient support, facilitating rapid implementation. VMware requires a more detailed setup process, supported by comprehensive customer service, which can cater to intricate configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix is recognized for competitive pricing and strong ROI due to lower setup costs and operational efficiency. VMware demands higher upfront costs, but its expansive features provide significant ROI through long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing robust disaster recovery infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Disaster Recovery a...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (5th)

Featured Reviews

Jaimin Mehta

Senior Server and Cloud Engineer at Ertech

Affordable, highly scalable, and outstanding support

For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us. Currently, Nutanix is providing the remote snapshot, and on the data center side, there is one cluster, and on the DR side, there is another cluster. We have synchronized both clusters with the same environment. For connectivity, we are using a Megaport link, and we have to pay a third party for that. If Nutanix can provide such connectivity, it will be helpful.

Read full review

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers simplified management and automated recovery process, which reduces the need for manual intervention during a disaster

Automated recovery is one good feature, SRM also offers simplified management. It has a centralized interface for configuring, testing, and executing disaster recovery plans across multiple sites. This means management from a single point, even for many sites. Recovery plans can be different for customers. So, another important feature is the policy-based protection within SRM. Recovery plans can be customized based on business requirements, including Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). These objectives might differ between industries – healthcare might need a more aggressive RPO, for instance. Additionally, SRM offers failback capabilities and reporting features for compliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."

"It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites."

"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful."

"The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use."

"VMware Live Recovery is a very useful tool for live recovery."

"In terms of resiliency, the most valuable aspect of SRM has been its effectiveness."

"The product functionality is fairly high-quality."

"It's easy to use and the interface is quite simple."

"The non-disruptive testing feature is a mature technology in the solution"

"It is a very stable solution...I was involved in VMware SRM's deployment phase two years ago, and it was an easy process."

"The most valuable feature is the simplicity of operations."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the integration part, along with the subsequent hardware."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"The pricing could be better."

"The solution needs improvement in cost."

"For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us."

"They need better reporting on the environment."

"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."

"The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better."

"It has a lot of dependencies on VMware infrastructure, and testing can be complex. Testing often requires extensive approval at the organizational level."

"The primary site lacks adequate equipment, such as power backup and cooling, which can lead to downtime during issues like power outages or overheating."

"VMware SRM lacks certain functions that other platforms have, such as better prioritization of allocation of resources and Boot profiles."

"It would be better if we could get more reporting features in VMware SRM."

"I would like to see better integration with other storage solutions. I would hope to see that within the next two or three years."

"The pricing structure is pretty expensive, especially after the recent changes, and it's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production."

"The improvements should be as per customer requirements."

"What I think can be improved is the data replication aspect."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I always want it to be cheaper."

"One-time costs may initially seem high, but they reflect the quality of the service received."

"Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."

"It is a little bit cheaper than the other products in the market. It is affordable."

"VMware SRM is a little bit pricey."

"We have a standard enterprise license for the solution."

"VMware SRM is quite expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight to nine out of ten."

"It is reasonably priced, and its cost hasn't been a significant factor in our implementation."

"It is about $3,000 a year for the 25 pack. The package gives you the ability to protect up to 25 virtual machines."

"The licensing costs are increasing."

"The price of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery should be lowered in order to compete better in the market."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Xi Leap?

The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Xi Leap?

Pricing is average. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where ten is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Xi Leap?

The solution needs improvement in cost.

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

The solution is pretty expensive after the changes, and it depends on the size of the customer if it's worth it. Larger enterprise customers can automate several features, making it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

The licenses need to be easier to quote. At the moment, it is complicated with all the changes. The pricing structure is pretty expensive, especially after the recent changes, and it's important fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zerto vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 41% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 12% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 6% of the time

Datto Cloud Continuity vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 25% of the time

Zerto vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 23% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

December 2024

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report

Download Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

December 2024

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Xi Leap

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Learn More

Nutanix

VMware

Overview

Nutanix Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) is a fully managed DR service that eliminates the need for a dedicated DR site, minimizes data loss and downtime, and helps organizations meet RTO/RPO SLAs confidently.

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery

January 2025

Free Report: Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.