VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto comparison

Read 279 Zerto reviews

11,224 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Zerto and VMware Live Recovery compete in the disaster recovery category. Zerto is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and support, whereas VMware Live Recovery wins over users with its comprehensive features, offering substantial value for the cost.

Features: Zerto provides continuous data protection, non-disruptive testing, and flexible recovery options. VMware Live Recovery boasts robust integration with VMware environments, automated failover, and a feature set more aligned with enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Zerto could improve its integration capabilities and the automation of failover processes. It may also lack in enterprise-specific features compared to VMware. VMware Live Recovery can benefit from reducing complexity in its initial setup and enhancing its support system. Its pricing could also be more accessible for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto is easy to deploy with a user-friendly process and provides quick support. VMware Live Recovery might require a more complex setup but integrates well into existing VMware ecosystems, offering support that benefits organizations already using VMware products.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto is notable for lower setup costs and a rapid ROI, making it appealing for cost-conscious businesses. VMware Live Recovery, while more expensive initially, justifies its price with a feature-rich offering that provides long-term value, especially for businesses prioritizing advanced recovery options and integration.

To learn more, read our detailed VMware Live Recovery vs. Zerto Report (Updated: January 2025).

VMware Live Recovery vs. Zerto

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

8.2

VMware Live Recovery users report notable cost savings and efficiency, achieving up to 100% returns and reduced downtime.

Sentiment score

7.3

Zerto enhances efficiency, reduces costs and downtime by automating disaster recovery and eliminating secondary hardware, providing substantial time savings.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.2

VMware Live Recovery support gets mixed reviews, with praise for responsiveness but reports of delays and inconsistency, especially off-hours.

Sentiment score

7.7

Zerto's customer support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though complex issues sometimes face slower response times post-HP acquisition.

They are knowledgeable.

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

IT Infrastructure Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

VMware Live Recovery is flexible for enterprises but faces challenges with compatibility, resources, and infrastructure-related scaling costs.

Sentiment score

7.6

Zerto efficiently manages scalable growth across diverse environments, supporting increased workloads with simple license additions and minimal intervention.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.5

VMware Live Recovery offers strong stability with minor glitches, and users report reliability with efficient support for resolving issues.

Sentiment score

8.0

Zerto is stable and reliable, with issues usually due to user errors, receiving high ratings for dependable performance.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Room For Improvement

VMware Live Recovery faces integration, stability, and scalability issues, with user concerns about complexity, support, and pricing.

Users desire improvements in Zerto's documentation, reporting, Hyper-V support, user interface, licensing, pricing, automation, and advanced features.

It's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production.

Sven Nimmich

Solution Architect at Lenovo

I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring.

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

IT Infrastructure Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Setup Cost

VMware Live Recovery is costly post-Broadcom acquisition, offering valuable automation for enterprises but pricey for smaller companies.

Zerto's VM licensing offers scalable pricing, viewed as cost-efficient yet sometimes expensive, aligning with powerful disaster recovery features.

For cloud-based solutions, the cost seems quite pricey, so we stick to on-premises deployment.

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

IT Infrastructure Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Valuable Features

VMware Live Recovery enhances disaster recovery with user-friendly interfaces, automated workflows, flexible recovery plans, and robust replication.

Zerto provides seamless integration, rapid recovery, and real-time replication, excelling in disaster recovery and migration with near-zero RPOs.

The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us.

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

IT Infrastructure Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

The solution offers a rich set of features, well adapted in the market.

Sven Nimmich

Solution Architect at Lenovo

Replicating my settings helps me recover point objectives faster and retain policies.

Channel Luke

IT Supervisor at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Zerto report

Categories and Ranking

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Zerto

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

279

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (4th), Cloud Backup (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 14.4%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 15.3%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers simplified management and automated recovery process, which reduces the need for manual intervention during a disaster

Automated recovery is one good feature, SRM also offers simplified management. It has a centralized interface for configuring, testing, and executing disaster recovery plans across multiple sites. This means management from a single point, even for many sites. Recovery plans can be different for customers. So, another important feature is the policy-based protection within SRM. Recovery plans can be customized based on business requirements, including Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). These objectives might differ between industries – healthcare might need a more aggressive RPO, for instance. Additionally, SRM offers failback capabilities and reporting features for compliance.

Read full review

Shri Sharan

Solutions architect at Kyndryl

Is user-friendly, saves us time, and costs

We encountered some issues during Active Directory recovery. When we implemented Active Directory, we provided feedback to Zerto regarding the challenges of recovering AD from the on-premises environment to the disaster recovery site. Unlike other virtual machines, AD recovery presents unique difficulties due to its active-active nature. It's unclear whether these challenges stem from Zerto itself or limitations within Microsoft Active Directory. However, in our experience using Zerto for AD recovery compared to other technologies, we faced data discrepancies that necessitated workarounds to bring AD online at the DR site. Certain applications we migrated from production relied on Active Directory authentication. To ensure successful application functionality at the DR site, a functional AD environment was a prerequisite to application migration. Therefore, our initial step involved copying and guaranteeing a running AD instance on the DR side before application recovery. However, upon attempting application authentication on the DR side, data inconsistencies prevented successful authentication. To address this, we created an isolated clone of the AD environment and conducted tests. Through trial and error, we were able to develop workarounds to resolve the issue. Notably, these challenges were specific to Active Directory; other VMs didn't exhibit similar problems.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Answers from the Community

Abhishek Dungrakoti

Works at PrimaryIO

Jan 2, 2025

What are the differences between Zerto, VMware SRM and Veeam Backup & Replication?

Hi Abhishek, That's a great question. In Europe/Austria most of the companies run Veeam - so do we. There a lot of advantages if you use Veeam as it's designed. Also, Zerto (more for Data migration) we use - but not for Backup. VM SRM is good for 1:n replication if you already use VMWare. There is a good comparison: https://community.veeam.com/vu... It's on the website from Veeam but still goo...

See 2 answers

Msc Schober

Senior Enterprise Architect at Mondess IT-Architects & Consultancy GmbH

May 22, 2023

Read full answer

JonathanHarris

Storage Solutions Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Jan 2, 2025

Zerto = VM near-synchronous replication (RPO in seconds), Multi-site and Multi-Cloud, Migration-only licensing available, Options for Backup-like long-term retention of VM snapshots, Application-centric DR workflows, Super easy to set up and run DR workflows, RTOs usually = mins, Built-in real-time ransomware detection, Options for HPE integrated Cyber Recovery Vault SRM = Asynchronous VM replication, relies on Storage platform snapshots and replication, RPOs will vary depending on storage platform. RTOs usually = hours depending on the size and complexity of the environment, VMware to VMware only, Comprehensive DR workflows for recovery, complicated to setup and run. Veeam = Many options for VM and VM data protection. Options for VM replication or VM backup with backup replication for DR. Can support Multi-Site and Multi-Cloud, Extensive backup and archive options for long-term retention, Ransomware detection by scanning backups, RPO – hours or days depending on backup and replication scheduled. Simple setup, DR recovery workflows are more manual than Zerto or SRM unless you leverage a 33rd party automation solution, RTOs usually = hours or days depending on dataset sizes and environment complexity.

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

The solution is pretty expensive after the changes, and it depends on the size of the customer if it's worth it. Larger enterprise customers can automate several features, making it cost-effective.

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

The licenses need to be easier to quote. At the moment, it is complicated with all the changes. The pricing structure is pretty expensive, especially after the recent changes, and it's important fo...

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

I would rate the pricing, setup cost, and licensing around a seven on a scale of one to ten. The pricing model could be more flexible to accommodate startup companies with lower budgets.

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 17% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

VMware Live Recovery

December 2024

Download Zerto product report

December 2024

Also Known As

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Zerto Virtual Replication

Learn More

VMware

Overview

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Sample Customers

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies