Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Zerto comparison

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Read 298 Zerto reviews

10,940 Views
5,335 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Zerto and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines compete in the disaster recovery solutions category. Zerto appears to have the upper hand due to its hardware independence, seamless integration, and low recovery point objective (RPO) times, which make it more adaptable and efficient for varied environments.

Features: Zerto is hardware-independent with seamless integration into vCenter Server, offering near-zero RPOs. It supports continuous disaster recovery and automatic IP address changes. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides real-time data protection, allowing detailed point-in-time recoveries with robust remote and local data protection features.

Room for Improvement: Zerto could improve its reporting, backup functionalities, and offer more flexible licensing options. Enhancements in its cloud integration and mobile capabilities are suggested. Dell should focus on simplifying its configuration process, improving the user interface, and addressing cost issues, which can be burdensome for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, praised for outstanding customer service, albeit a slight decline post-acquisition. Dell RecoverPoint emphasizes on-premises setups tailored for traditional infrastructural needs, receiving excellent customer service feedback, though it struggles with complex support escalation.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto's per-VM pricing model is cost-effective for businesses with limited critical systems, offering significant ROI through reduced downtime and efficiency improvements. It's seen as more expensive than some rivals. Dell RecoverPoint, while also costly and based on VM count and capacity, provides strong disaster recovery features, though its pricing might be restrictive for smaller firms.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Zerto Report (Updated: March 2025).

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Zerto

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zerto

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

298

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (4th), Cloud Backup (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 4.2%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 10.5%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado

IT Architect Consultant at RTFM

Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites

It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any kind of bug or glitch. We haven't experienced crashes."

"The technical support from Dell is excellent."

"The most valuable feature is that it is journal-based and you don't have to replicate a lot of data."

"The product's initial setup phase was quite easy to install."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

"The most valuable features are the data center recovery administration and the time of recovery."

"It is a very simple tool to use and offers flexibility in using the tool for recovery and transitioning from one state to another."

"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros

"The replication being log-based is awesome."

"I like the automation of transferring data in the case of any disaster to our VMs. It is also easy to use and fast."

"Speed of recovery has been very effective in getting our information back as fast as we're able to get it. The daily backup solution that we use alternatively only allows a single backup versus having continuous backup replication with Zerto, it's a no-brainer."

"I would give it an eight out of 10, if not a nine out of 10, when it comes to ease of use."

"Files can also be extracted from the VMDK at the remote site even when the VM is off."

"Real-time replication is a valuable feature, ensuring that changes made to the production site are immediately reflected at the recovery site."

"The whole package is valuable. The most useful feature for the company is the rapid RTO, which offers a faster return to operations and brings us back online quicker. The last time we had an issue, we recovered within about 36 minutes, which was probably the most valuable thing for us because, previously, it took four to seven days."

"The fact that we are able to test the failover of live systems during regular hours is invaluable to our organization."

More Zerto pros

Cons

"The solution currently supports only VMware. There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox. Additionally, licensing has become less flexible and more expensive."

"In the next release of this software, I would like to see options that help to decrease the bandwidth required, such as compressing the data."

"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."

"Maybe integration with Kubernetes for OpenShift would be helpful."

"It can have better integration. It would be good if, in addition to VMware VM, it can also support other hypervisors. I also want to see support for Oracle databases. As of now, it supports only SQL and Exchange. It would be good to also support other databases."

"The solution currently supports only VMware."

"The configuration process seems a bit challenging, and the installation takes a bit longer than expected."

"It would be good to have a critical application on the customer side."

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons

"We're not fully satisfied with the support team."

"I don't have any input for improvement or a critical feature request at this moment. If anything, a lower price is always better."

"Maybe the reporting for the failover test could be a little better."

"The technical support is hit or miss."

"We had some issues with replication, especially on Linux, but we have already resolved them."

"The post-configuration part could be improved. For example, it would be super helpful to have the ability to modify DNS. Once the migration is done, we want to do some more modifications to the endpoint."

"With secure boot enabled, which is the case for newer systems, it is not easy to rotate passwords and we would have to reinstall the DRAs."

"I would like to request better reporting in Zerto. I can see the data that I need in the console, but if I need to put the data or the history into a report, it is difficult. It is something that auditors might require, so reporting is something that needs to be improved."

More Zerto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive product."

"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."

"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."

"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."

"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."

"Staffing may be a little thin at times, but as far as budgeting what we buy, the price for this solution has not been so outrageous that we don't buy it."

"Zerto is more cost-effective than Azure."

"The pricing is a little more expensive in comparison to other tools."

"The pricing is based on virtual machines. They need to do better in regards to their tiering pricing rather than one price per VM. A lot of times we have VMs that are lower tier, such as Tier 2 or Tier 3, but we pay the same price as for Tier 1. I know they are developing this out, but it would be nice if they could provide a little better pricing in regards to their tiering protection."

"Currently, it is good, but the license we are using is based on VM count. We are only protecting mission-critical servers, so we are using a very low number, about 300. However, we have 3,000 or more servers. If we consider using Zerto for data protection, it would cost us more than what we have for data protection now."

"It initially seemed a little pricey, but in the big picture, you're paying for peace of mind. It could always be cheaper and more competitive, which would make it an easier choice for people, but I can see both ways. They can say this cost is for the value they are providing. If anything happens, they can recover your data very quickly. You won't be losing it, so there is a win. It is a win-win."

"Pricing is adequate at the standard of the product, but there could be "always" some improvement. We would like to see a consumption model that would charge in a DR scenario, where you're failing over and consuming those resources, instead of a per-protected-node model."

"The pricing is top tier but offers good value."

More Zerto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.

What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?

The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX. In...

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Zerto is definitely more costly compared to its competitors, such as VMware Site Recovery Manager. It may not be suitable for small and medium-sized industries.

VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 24% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Compared 3% of the time

More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 5% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines

Download Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines report

Download Zerto product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines enables quick recovery of VMware virtual machines and allows you to efficiently test, manage and orchestrate operational backup and disaster recovery operations.

With tight integration with VMware, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is storage and application agnostic, with built-in automation accessible via VMware vSphere web client plug-in.

When cloud becomes a vital part of your disaster recovery strategy, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is also web-enabled, providing efficient replication to AWS and VMware Cloud on AWS.

RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite.

Dell Technologies

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. Zerto