Top 10 Azure Site Recovery Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

22 reviews
91% willing to recommend

117 followers

Top Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Site Recovery based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Commvault Cloud, VMware Live Recovery, and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Azure Site Recovery surpasses its competitors by offering seamless disaster recovery solutions with automatic replication, simplified orchestration, and point-in-time recovery, ensuring business continuity and minimizing downtime for critical applications in cloud environments.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Commvault Cloud

4.3 out of 5

Commvault Cloud

4.3 out of 5

Commvault Cloud excels in comprehensive data management with strong backup features and flexibility in licensing. In comparison, Azure Site Recovery focuses on seamless disaster recovery within Azure environments, emphasizing cost-efficiency and integration simplicity, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing automated failover.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. Commvault Cloud Report

Pricing

Commvault Cloud features a straightforward setup with transparent costs, while Azure Site Recovery offers an efficient setup process, though it may involve higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Commvault Cloud features a straightforward setup with transparent costs, while Azure Site Recovery offers an efficient setup process, though it may involve higher initial expenses.

VMware Live Recovery

4.0 out of 5

VMware Live Recovery

4.0 out of 5

Azure Site Recovery excels in integration with Azure environments and offers cost-effective, scalable disaster recovery. In comparison, VMware Live Recovery provides extensive enterprise-level functionalities and reliable replication. A tech buyer might choose Azure for its pricing, while VMware suits those needing advanced features despite higher costs.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery Report

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery offers minimal setup costs, while VMware Live Recovery requires a more substantial initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery offers minimal setup costs, while VMware Live Recovery requires a more substantial initial investment.

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

4.5 out of 5

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service

4.5 out of 5

Azure Site Recovery offers automated data recovery and simplified protection for businesses needing ease and automation. In comparison, Nutanix Disaster Recovery provides seamless multi-cloud integration and advanced orchestration, attracting companies with complex infrastructures requiring robust features. Nutanix is costlier, while Azure ensures a lower initial setup.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Report

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery has competitive setup costs, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service offers scalable solutions with varying pricing options.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery has competitive setup costs, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service offers scalable solutions with varying pricing options.

Druva Phoenix

4.3 out of 5

Druva Phoenix

4.3 out of 5

Druva Phoenix provides simplicity and strong customer support, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective backup solutions with minimal setup complexities. In comparison, Azure Site Recovery offers scalability and integration with Azure services, addressing complex disaster recovery needs despite its potentially higher initial costs.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. Druva Phoenix Report

Pricing

Druva Phoenix offers straightforward setup costs with a transparent pricing model, while Azure Site Recovery involves a more complex pricing structure with potential additional costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Druva Phoenix offers straightforward setup costs with a transparent pricing model, while Azure Site Recovery involves a more complex pricing structure with potential additional costs.

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

4.6 out of 5

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery

4.6 out of 5

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers ease of use with its dashboard and server protection. In comparison, Azure Site Recovery excels in seamless integration with Azure environments. Buyers might choose Infrascale for simplicity or opt for Azure due to its enterprise-level advantages.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery Report

Pricing

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, whereas Azure Site Recovery involves a higher initial setup expense, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions in terms of initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Disaster Recovery Services

4.3 out of 5

IBM Disaster Recovery Services

4.3 out of 5

IBM Disaster Recovery Services offers extensive customization for complex environments, while Azure Site Recovery excels with seamless Azure integration. In comparison, Azure's pricing is attractive for existing Azure users. Meanwhile, IBM provides strong ROI for tailored recovery needs.

Download Azure Site Recovery vs. IBM Disaster Recovery Services Report

Pricing

IBM Disaster Recovery Services involves complex setup costs, whereas Azure Site Recovery offers a more straightforward initial cost structure, highlighting a key difference in setup complexity and cost between the two services.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Backup and Recovery

eDiscovery