Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Site Recovery pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft

4.0 out of 5

26 reviews
92% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Azure Site Recovery is easy to use, integrates well with Azure components, and offers secure, scalable disaster recovery. It supports automated file synchronization, reduces backup time, and saves costs. However, improvements in error logging, hypervisor, and version support are needed. Its deployment complexity, integration limitations, pricing unpredictability, and bugs could impact performance. Despite being highly capable, clearer documentation and improved stability are essential for enhancing its business continuity solutions.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Azure Site Recovery is easy to use and stable, offering seamless migration and integration possibilities while being scalable and reliable.

It provides efficient disaster recovery solutions, saving significant time and costs by allowing automation of workload movement and traffic redirection.

The tool is praised for its effective reporting and dashboards, which enhance business visibility during recovery processes.

Automated file synchronization and integration with existing systems are major advantages, aiding in legacy system management.

Azure Site Recovery enables substantial time savings in VM backup and recovery operations, contributing to overall efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

CONS

Error logging in Azure Site Recovery requires streamlining, and troubleshooting processes need clarity when issues arise.

Pricing predictability and clarity could be better, with improvements needed in helping customers predict usage accurately.

Support is slow and unprofessional, with significant delays in response times.

Current replication and failover processes in Azure Site Recovery lack efficiency and could improve stability.

Integration with other platforms is limited, impacting flexibility in diverse IT environments.

Azure Site Recovery Pros review quotes

reviewer1271010

Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Feb 23, 2020

The solution is very easy to use.

Read full review

Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 16, 2020

They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.

Read full review

reviewer1279092

Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Apr 20, 2020

It is a very stable product and very scalable.

Read full review

Azure Site Recovery

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Azure Site Recovery. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IT Manager Global Service Delivery at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 12, 2021

The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.

Read full review

Fernando Cordero

Technology Officer at GikBrain

May 18, 2022

The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards.

Read full review

reviewer1508952

Cloud Architect at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Nov 9, 2022

The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products.

Read full review

Muhammad Saad Zahoor

Cloud Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 16, 2022

What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution.

Read full review

Sujit Suryavanshi

Assistant Manager - IT at Logixal

Feb 13, 2023

Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration.

Read full review

SM

Enterprise architect at Kapsch

Mar 17, 2023

Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery.

Read full review

Rajesh Patel Patel

Technical Specialist at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Mar 30, 2023

Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR).

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 24)

Azure Site Recovery Cons review quotes

reviewer1271010

Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Feb 23, 2020

When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.

Read full review

Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 16, 2020

It could include more of a backup and recovery.

Read full review

reviewer1279092

Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Apr 20, 2020

We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.

Read full review

Azure Site Recovery

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Azure Site Recovery. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IT Manager Global Service Delivery at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 12, 2021

It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.

Read full review

Fernando Cordero

Technology Officer at GikBrain

May 18, 2022

The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved.

Read full review

reviewer1508952

Cloud Architect at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Nov 9, 2022

The immutable backup could be better.

Read full review

Muhammad Saad Zahoor

Cloud Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Dec 16, 2022

In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement.

Read full review

Sujit Suryavanshi

Assistant Manager - IT at Logixal

Feb 13, 2023

Site Recovery's scalability could be improved.

Read full review

SM

Enterprise architect at Kapsch

Mar 17, 2023

Could have more integration with other platforms.

Read full review

Rajesh Patel Patel

Technical Specialist at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Mar 30, 2023

The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 24)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Azure Site Recovery

IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery

Lumen SafeHaven vs Azure Site Recovery

Phoenix Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery

Axcient x360Recover vs Azure Site Recovery

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery

VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Azure Site Recovery

IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery

Lumen SafeHaven vs Azure Site Recovery

Phoenix Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery

Axcient x360Recover vs Azure Site Recovery

See all alternatives

Related questions

46

Why is disaster recovery important?

57

Can you recommend a disaster recovery automation tool?

70

What is the difference between cyber resilience and business continuity?

10

When should an enterprise choose a Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) solution?

32

Which device do you recommend to use for traffic shaping & bandwidth optimization between P2P links?

10

When evaluating Disaster Recovery as a Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

11

Why is Disaster Recovery as a Service important for companies?