AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Rocket Servergraph comparison

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Rocket Servergraph compete in the disaster recovery and monitoring/reporting category. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have the upper hand due to its deployment and support, while Rocket Servergraph stands out for its feature set despite its higher price point.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its integration with existing AWS services, automation capabilities, and robust scalability. Rocket Servergraph receives high marks for its extensive reporting features, usability, and ability to manage heterogeneous environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery suggest enhanced support for non-AWS environments and better cost management tools. Rocket Servergraph users indicate a need for a more modern interface and better support for cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is often highlighted for its streamlined deployment within AWS-based systems and responsive customer support. Rocket Servergraph, while straightforward in deployment, especially in mixed environments, faces critiques for slower support response times.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which users find cost-effective. Rocket Servergraph, though pricier upfront, delivers robust ROI through its comprehensive monitoring capabilities.