Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Security Hub vs Google Cloud Security Command Center comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Security Hub support is praised for its prompt technical assistance but could improve email response efficiency.
No sentiment score available
AWS ProLogitech Support is very helpful and timely, especially at the enterprise level.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.5
AWS Security Hub needs real-time scanning improvements, better integrations, enhanced compliance, cost control, and user-friendly features.
No sentiment score available
A more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub is scalable and efficient for multi-account operations but less effective in multi-cloud environments.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.0
AWS Security Hub offers flexible, cost-effective subscription models, appealing to enterprises for its affordability and included cloud security features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
AWS Security Hub is highly regarded for its stability, frequent updates, and reliable performance, though improvement is suggested by some.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub enhances cloud security by integrating services, offering centralized management, real-time alerts, and compliance evaluations.
No sentiment score available
The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
14th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th)
Google Cloud Security Comma...
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
26th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

CobusFrey - PeerSpot reviewer
Not only does it easily integrate with third-party tools but also allows auto synchronization of logs
AWS Security Hub has advanced quite a bit over the last couple of years. The features are quite rich now. Before purchasing, one should develop an understanding of the product. I believe AWS Security Hub is one of the most friendly solutions for integration with third-party tools. I find the integration of AWS Security Hub to be the easiest with tools from Microsoft and a bit difficult with Google solutions. AWS Security Hub is compliant in many different ways. The development business I am part of is SOC compliant for AWS Security Hub, while the banks our organization works with have been PCI compliant for AWS Security Hub for three years. I would definitely recommend AWS Security Hub to others, yet I would also inquire about their purpose and knowledge of cloud solutions. If you know how to use AWS Security Hub, it can be a great solution to work with. The solution is more suitable for people working in the cloud instead of on-premises. I would rate AWS Security Hub a nine out of ten.
Nishant_Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides visibility, address cloud misconfiguration and prevent threats
In terms of identifying, the solution is pretty good. It takes care of all the layers. We have Cloud, Kubernetes cluster, instances running, and network. We have identities, permissions, and access. It provides pictures of everything in GCP. There's no such integration required. There are Google APIs that you need to enable. The compliance reporting feature helped us maintain a baseline of compliance within the information security policies. It's pretty stable and scalable. However, visibility can be improved along with automation. SCC to provide an option to fix those things, perhaps by clicking a button. For example, if a firewall rule allows an application to accept HTTP traffic, I should be able to address that specific issue directly within the interface. It's just a regular call to action button. There are no prerequisites for the solution. It's a requirement to have good security visibility into your Google Cloud Infrastructure. Cloud Security Command Center could be a good product to consider. There are other open-source solutions available. There are solutions from Aqua that are pretty decent. I would recommend that if somebody is opting for SCC, they should also explore open-source solutions. Open-source solutions can be very beneficial, especially if they are pursuing a multi-cloud strategy. You won't need additional security tools for platforms like AWS or others. Whenever a security issue pops up, a generative AI backend provides a summary of what happened. The information provided is quite detailed. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user186927 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2015
Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL
Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
8%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?
The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.
What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?
AWS Security Hub could improve its guidance links to resolve findings related to multiple resources. The implementation of more guidance links could enhance issue resolution. Additionally, shorteni...
What do you like most about Google Cloud Security Command Center?
The compliance reporting feature helped us maintain a baseline of compliance within the information security policies.
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Security Command Center?
The primary use case is to monitor the Google Cloud infrastructure across all projects for security-related alerts. The command center provides various features, including real-time alerting for ti...
 

Also Known As

SQRRL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Google Cloud Security Command Center and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.