Top 10 Google Cloud Security Command Center Alternatives

3.7 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Google Cloud Security Command Center Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Google Cloud Security Command Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Google Cloud Security Command Center surpasses its competitors by providing a centralized platform for threat detection, asset discovery, and vulnerability management, offering real-time insights and comprehensive security solutions to protect enterprise environments from potential risks and breaches.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Wiz

4.5 out of 5

Wiz

4.5 out of 5

Wiz offers intuitive features and ease of deployment, appealing for cost efficiency and support. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center delivers robust security features with extensive threat intelligence. Buyers may prefer Wiz for budget-friendly options; Google Cloud suits those needing comprehensive security tools.

Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. Wiz Report

Pricing

Wiz offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Wiz offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in ease of deployment and native integration with Azure services. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center offers advanced security reports and functionality, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing features despite higher costs and platform integration complexity.

Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Cloud has higher setup costs compared to Google Cloud Security Command Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Both services provide robust security features, but their pricing structures cater to different needs and budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security excels in customer support and pricing satisfaction with features like intuitive setup and real-time threat detection. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center showcases extensive integration and seamless alignment with Google Cloud services, justifying its higher pricing and feature depth for tech buyers.

Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is praised for its transparent and straightforward setup cost, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center is noted for its scalable and flexible pricing model. SentinelOne emphasizes simplicity, while Google focuses on adaptability.

View comparison

Pricing

Orca Security

4.6 out of 5

Orca Security

4.6 out of 5

Orca Security offers quick deployment and strong vulnerability detection ideal for fast implementation. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center provides deeper Google Cloud integration, appealing for broader security management despite complex deployment. Orca's transparent pricing contrasts with Google's comprehensive features justifying higher costs.

Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. Orca Security Report

Pricing

Orca Security requires a minimal setup cost, offering ease of implementation, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center involves a higher setup expense, reflecting its integrated capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Orca Security requires a minimal setup cost, offering ease of implementation, whereas Google Cloud Security Command Center involves a higher setup expense, reflecting its integrated capabilities.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

4.0 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

4.0 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security excels in real-time threat intelligence and competitive pricing, appealing to those seeking efficient threat response and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center offers extensive integration and control, ideal for users prioritizing comprehensive visibility and Google ecosystem synergy.

Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Google Cloud Security Command Center Report

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security incurs higher initial setup costs compared to the more affordable Google Cloud Security Command Center, highlighting significant differences in upfront expenses between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Lacework

4.3 out of 5

Lacework

4.3 out of 5

Lacework offers automation and intuitive dashboards with straightforward deployment, attracting those valuing integration and competitive pricing. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center is preferred for extensive threat detection, analytics, and integration within Google, suiting complex environments accepting higher costs for feature depth.

Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. Lacework Report

Pricing

Lacework offers straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Security Command Center provides a more complex and potentially costly setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

Lacework offers straightforward setup cost, while Google Cloud Security Command Center provides a more complex and potentially costly setup process.

Related categories

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Vulnerability Management