AWS Step Functions vs Genpact Cora SeQuence comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Genpact are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Genpact is ranked #40. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Genpact’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Genpact users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 13 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,386 Views
1,837 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Read 2 Genpact Cora SeQuence reviews

377 Views
221 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Genpact Cora SeQuence and AWS Step Functions are competitors in the workflow automation space. AWS Step Functions has the upper hand due to its robust feature set, despite Genpact having better pricing and support.

Features: Genpact Cora SeQuence provides comprehensive process automation, integration capabilities, and a strong focus on operational efficiency. AWS Step Functions offers serverless orchestration, easy integration with AWS services, and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Genpact Cora SeQuence offers straightforward deployment with dedicated customer service for business processes. AWS Step Functions provides seamless integration with AWS services and comprehensive documentation but lacks personalized support. Though AWS has more complex setup procedures, its resources support the process.

Pricing and ROI: Genpact Cora SeQuence is cost-effective with a favorable ROI due to lower setup costs and effective integration features. AWS Step Functions has higher upfront costs but offers expansive features and integration capabilities, providing greater ROI for larger-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (13th)

Genpact Cora SeQuence

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 2.3%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Carlos Alberto Marangon

Senior AWS Tech Lead at Nextios

Automate complex workflows with seamless AWS integration

Step Functions provide seamless integration with AWS services, which enhances the speed of application development. The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily. The Standard Workflows feature includes error replay capabilities, which are crucial for efficient error management. The Amazon State Language (ASL) in JSON format facilitates workflow automation and accelerates the deployment of Step Functions.

Read full review

Helgi Jonsson

Prosthetics Quality Center Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.

I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface."

"AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices."

"The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily."

"The number of historical events is great."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

"AWS Step Functions offers advanced workflows that save time and enhance efficiency by reducing delays and ensuring consistent orchestration among various services."

"It is a scalable solution."

"AWS Step Functions was stable, and there were no problems that I can recall."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

"It is very stable. There is no downtime."

Cons

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow."

"The pricing of the solution can be improved."

"Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good."

"One area for improvement is the payload size. Currently, I sometimes have to save data as a file since I cannot pass it within Step Functions, necessitating caching in processes."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency."

"The solution's data size limit can be improved."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."

"The setup and configuration is complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

I use Step Functions for orchestrating several application workflows. Specifically, I often use Step Functions to automate processes requiring multiple steps and for application orchestration. I fo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

Overall, I would rate AWS Step Functions at least nine out of ten. The technology is robust, but improving the payload size could enhance the product's utility further.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 34% of the time

IBM BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 16% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Appian vs Genpact Cora SeQuence

Compared 100% of the time

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

April 2025

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Genpact Cora SeQuence product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite

Overview

AWS Step Functions enables orchestration of complex workflows, parallel task execution, and seamless integration with AWS services, simplifying ETL automation and data pipeline management.

With AWS Step Functions, developers streamline task automation and ensure smooth microservices orchestration. It simplifies development and manages interdependencies, validates data, and integrates AWS services for cost-effective workflows. It offers a user-friendly graphical interface for creating pipelines, scalable parallelization via the "map" state, control over historical events, and visualization with JSON. Enhanced by a dashboard-like view, it aids in visual workflows and debugging.

What are the most valuable features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Easily integrates with the entire AWS suite for efficient workflow creation.
User-Friendly Graphical Interface: Simplifies creating and managing workflows with visual tools.
Scalable Parallelization: Utilizes the "map" state for efficient parallel processing tasks.
Control Historical Events: Manages and controls historical data and events effectively.
Visualization and Debugging: Provides a dashboard-like view to enhance understanding and debugging.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for?

Streamlined Development: Simplifies orchestration and automates task management.
Cost-Effective Workflows: Creates efficient, cost-saving workflows by integrating with AWS services.
Enhanced Data Validation: Ensures data correctness by managing interdependencies.
Automation of ETL Jobs: Automates data extraction, transformation, and loading processes seamlessly.

In specific industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, enterprises implement AWS Step Functions to manage data pipelines, orchestrate microservices, and automate complex ETL jobs. They benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, enhanced data validation, and streamlined development, resulting in efficient and cost-effective workflows tailored to their operational needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle.Â The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.

Genpact

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.