AWS Step Functions vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #41. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 13 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,386 Views
1,837 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Read 2 TIBCO iProcess Suite reviews

311 Views
212 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

TIBCO iProcess Suite and AWS Step Functions are workflow automation products. AWS Step Functions has the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, though TIBCO offers competitive pricing and strong support.

Features: TIBCO iProcess Suite manages complex business processes, provides advanced integration capabilities, and includes robust reporting tools. AWS Step Functions allows creation of serverless workflows, offers high scalability due to native cloud integration, and provides adaptability with cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Step Functions offers seamless cloud-based deployment, quick implementation, and extensive documentation and community support. TIBCO iProcess Suite requires hands-on configuration for on-premises deployment and provides tailored customer service for businesses needing customization.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO iProcess Suite has a higher initial setup cost with potential for significant ROI through customization. AWS Step Functions features a flexible pricing model aligned with usage, reducing initial expenses and offering cost efficiency through scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (13th)

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 2.3%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO iProcess Suite is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Carlos Alberto Marangon

Senior AWS Tech Lead at Nextios

Automate complex workflows with seamless AWS integration

Step Functions provide seamless integration with AWS services, which enhances the speed of application development. The JSON app launched recently allows us to define data execution more easily. The Standard Workflows feature includes error replay capabilities, which are crucial for efficient error management. The Amazon State Language (ASL) in JSON format facilitates workflow automation and accelerates the deployment of Step Functions.

Read full review

Samy Abushanab

Senior Software Development Team Leader at sejel

An easy-to-use solution with great integration

It involves a lot of investment. The learning curve is not similar to other products, like K2. Regarding the user interface, I have to access workflows and define and manage the processes on the variant of a Windows application, which is not accessible if you don't have access from the client to install it on the workstation. And most of the solutions we're currently evaluating are web-based. Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing. It has lots of elements. It's not user-intuitive compared to other products. Other than that, the licensing model is our main concern.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Step Functions was stable, and there were no problems that I can recall."

"AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices."

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

"The number of historical events is great."

"It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface."

"What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use."

"If you want to create a workflow to call one Lambda function after another, and other serverless features, it could save you a ton of money. That's for sure."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."

Cons

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"Increasing the payload size would be beneficial."

"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language."

"It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency."

"If AWS Step Functions keeps adding more integrations, it would be even better."

"There is room for improvement in terms of integration with other products. It would benefit from more integration with different applications or services."

"The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price could definitely be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

The primary use case was the execution of scripts and data migration related to data lakes. We were using Python and other AWS Step Functions ( /products/aws-step-functions-reviews ).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

I would recommend AWS Step Functions to others. Overall, I rate AWS Step Functions an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 34% of the time

IBM BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 16% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle BPM vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Apache Airflow vs TIBCO iProcess Suite

Compared 100% of the time

More TIBCO iProcess Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

April 2025

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download TIBCO iProcess Suite product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

iProcess Suite

Overview

AWS Step Functions enables orchestration of complex workflows, parallel task execution, and seamless integration with AWS services, simplifying ETL automation and data pipeline management.

With AWS Step Functions, developers streamline task automation and ensure smooth microservices orchestration. It simplifies development and manages interdependencies, validates data, and integrates AWS services for cost-effective workflows. It offers a user-friendly graphical interface for creating pipelines, scalable parallelization via the "map" state, control over historical events, and visualization with JSON. Enhanced by a dashboard-like view, it aids in visual workflows and debugging.

What are the most valuable features?

Seamless AWS Integration: Easily integrates with the entire AWS suite for efficient workflow creation.
User-Friendly Graphical Interface: Simplifies creating and managing workflows with visual tools.
Scalable Parallelization: Utilizes the "map" state for efficient parallel processing tasks.
Control Historical Events: Manages and controls historical data and events effectively.
Visualization and Debugging: Provides a dashboard-like view to enhance understanding and debugging.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for?

Streamlined Development: Simplifies orchestration and automates task management.
Cost-Effective Workflows: Creates efficient, cost-saving workflows by integrating with AWS services.
Enhanced Data Validation: Ensures data correctness by managing interdependencies.
Automation of ETL Jobs: Automates data extraction, transformation, and loading processes seamlessly.

In specific industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, enterprises implement AWS Step Functions to manage data pipelines, orchestrate microservices, and automate complex ETL jobs. They benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, enhanced data validation, and streamlined development, resulting in efficient and cost-effective workflows tailored to their operational needs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

TIBCO iProcess Suite is a proven and comprehensive suite of business process management (BPM) software that enables organizations to streamline the internal and external processes and tasks that span and make up their business.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.