Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Trusted Advisor vs Cisco Intersight comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.9
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco Intersight's customer support is praised for professionalism and knowledge, though experiences vary, with some reporting mixed results.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.0
IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.4
Cisco Intersight struggles with bugs, integration issues, and usability, needing better third-party support, automation, and deployment ease.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.1
Cisco Intersight is scalable, cloud-based, requires minimal management, and adapts easily to varying business demands and users.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Cisco Intersight offers competitive pricing with no extra fees, perceived as cost-effective and valuable by users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Cisco Intersight is generally stable, though stability issues may arise with new features; users value its consistent performance.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Cisco Intersight excels in integration, cloud management, automation, and analytics, offering scalability and unified data center oversight.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Management
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st)
AWS Trusted Advisor
Ranking in Cloud Management
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Intersight
Ranking in Cloud Management
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 6.3%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Trusted Advisor is 1.1%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 3.5%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
Labhesh Hase - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and easy-to-use product that provides excellent cost optimization features and technical support
The cost optimization features are valuable. The product is easy to use. We can watch each metric and take corrective actions. It keeps fetching environmental information all the time. If someone makes any changes, we get updates from the tool. Even a person who does not have any idea of AWS can use the product.
David Fartouk - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps know whether a solution is deployed correctly, but the automation capabilities are difficult to use
We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy the solution. It didn't give us much value. It wasn't that good. Intersight is a pretty complex solution. It can give you a lot of things, but nothing is simple. The usability must be better.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
43%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
What do you like most about AWS Trusted Advisor?
The Security Advisor is the most valuable feature. It instantly informs you about any system misconfigurations, and t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Trusted Advisor?
As long as you have a corporate AWS account, which most companies do. Personal accounts wouldn't have it, but any cor...
What needs improvement with AWS Trusted Advisor?
Maybe adding more security rules would be great. It comes with around 20-25 baseline rules. If you want more, like 30...
What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?
Intersight can validate our environment.
What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?
We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy th...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?
We use the solution for server management across various locations.
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
No data available
Intersight
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
EXMAR, RapidScale
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Cisco Intersight and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.