Axonius vs Device42 comparison

The compared Axonius and Device42 solutions aren't in the same category. Axonius is ranked #1 in CASM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 28.4% mindshare in the category. Device42 is ranked #5 in IAM , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Device42 users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 9 Axonius reviews

4,866 Views
3,358 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Device42

Read 34 Device42 reviews

4,548 Views
2,047 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axonius

Device42

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axonius and Device42 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius, Armis, Qualys and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM).

To learn more, read our detailed Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,776 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (5th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (1st)

Device42

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (5th), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd), Data Center Infrastructure Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

Axonius and Device42 aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Axonius is designed for Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) and holds a mindshare of 28.4%, down 35.4% compared to last year.
Device42, on the other hand, focuses on IT Asset Management, holds 4.1% mindshare, down 6.1% since last year.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axonius	28.4%
Armis	14.0%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.8%
Other	46.8%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

IT Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Device42	4.1%
ServiceNow	12.9%
Freshservice	5.4%
Other	77.6%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"In comparing Axonius to other products, I believe its main competitors on the market offer similar functionalities, but my experience with other solutions has shown me that Axonius stands out."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"The REST API abilities enables us to run scripts that pull information from our servers about software, storage, etc. Anything we need is pushed through REST API to the Device42 server and reflected in the report it generates."

"The import/export for bulk operations is a valuable and good feature."

"It has agentless discovery; you don't need to put agents on your servers. You can open one or two ports to discover all your infrastructure."

"Device42 positively impacts my organization because we build the as-is as soon as possible, avoiding the delays we would face with the network or security teams, and I captured more than 100 traffic entries in just two weeks, which was great."

"The continuous asset discovery is good because it means not having to manually input all the small data, such as IP addresses, leases, etc. It helps and saves us a lot of time."

"The reporting part is valuable. You have classic reports, and you can also do advanced reporting. They also have the DOQL feature for queries. You can write SQL queries to get your data and create custom reports."

"The tool is user-friendly, easy to understand, and flexible."

"Device42 has everything in one place and links it altogether, which helps when you need to figure out where things are going wrong, where things are happening, or how everything is linked together."

More Device42 pros

Cons

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"The only thing which I have noticed so far that is not good is that we had an issue with some reporting from the tool, reporting we had to export. We couldn't do it in the way we wanted to, so we tried to reach out to their support but it took pretty long until we understood how we can manage the reports. We still haven't received a complete explanation of what we need to do and how to do it."

"In my experience I believe that the key concern is the pricing strategy of the solution. Instead other solutions such as lanweber are much more cost effective. Previously, Device42 operated on perpetualysis without any fees. But recently they have altered the pricing model to include a subscription fee which I see as a very costly affair. Therefore I would like to suggest that they evaluate their pricing strategy and licence scheme, conduct a market research and ensure that they provide the right product in the market at the right price."

"The dependency mapping can be quite slow sometimes, if you've got a lot of things connecting to services."

"If I want to delete an asset from a cabinet it does take a while. And if I'm doing it in bulk — say, for example, if we have one cabinet that has 20 servers in — if I want to remove all 20 servers, I have to do them individually, which is a bit time-consuming. If there were a way that I could just bulk-remove everything from there, that would definitely save some time."

"A con for Device42 is that Kubernetes integration is lacking."

"The architecture is a bit old-fashioned. Device42 is on one server, appliance, virtual machine, or guest. We are loading more into Device42 than it can hold. Overloading Device42 with REST API calls or tasks will directly impact every aspect because the server will be too busy to answer requests."

"Since I was focused on deploying connectors and getting all the servers to be scanned, one of the biggest pains was when a job would fail, then the output (logging) was poor."

"The resources table needs a few tweaks. We've raised a feature request for this. When you click on resources, it opens up the entire CMDB or the entire data stored in Device42. If that could be customizable, it would be good. We should be allowed to add our own columns to that by writing a script or something like that. There should be an option to add or limit whatever we want."

More Device42 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."

"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."

"We pay $100,000 per year."

"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."

"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."

"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the su...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 17% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 8% of the time

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

OctoXLabs vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 7% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

May 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Device42

May 2026

Download Device42 product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius, Armis, Qualys and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.