Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs SAP Integration Suite comparison

"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."

"This product is a ten when it comes to API management."

"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."

"The most beneficial feature of SAP Integration Suite for our operation is its capability to enable API-based cloud applications to integrate seamlessly with SAP S/4HANA."

"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."

"The technical support services are good."

"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

"The product's UI could be faster."

"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."

"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."

"The instances are costly."

"I believe there are areas where SAP Integration Suite could be improved, such as enhancing message transformation capabilities and simplifying conditional routing features compared to the on-premise tool SAP PO (Process Orchestration)."

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"It is inexpensive for smaller businesses and expensive for larger businesses."

"I'm not well-versed in the details of pricing and standard licensing for SAP Integration Suite as I primarily focus on technical aspects. As far as I know, clients can choose between different levels of offerings based on their messaging frequency and business requirements, with premium levels offering more features and customization options."

"I rate its pricing a five out of ten."