Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is scalable, flexible, and critical for operations, aiding growth despite minor on-premises adjustments challenges.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is praised for its reliability, flexibility, integration capabilities, data mapping, and seamless SAP integration.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.3
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite requires better error tracking, improved training, user interface, API connectivity, cost models, documentation, and monitoring.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
9.4
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is praised for its stability, reliability, and high performance with minimal downtime and seamless updates.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SEEBURGER's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, but users experience variability in response times, especially for complex issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers flexible pricing starting at £19,000 annually, with costs based on usage and required services.
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Integration Suite
Ranking in API Management
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Ranking in API Management
23rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (7th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Management category, the mindshare of SAP Integration Suite is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedHaridy - PeerSpot reviewer
Has many add-on services and supports different authentication methods
The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities. The SAP Integration Suite has different add-ons and services that are easy to activate. You can create chatbots and integrate them with websites and apps. You can also build custom customer apps from scratch using various technologies. These apps can be based on databases or programming languages like Java. The suite also supports special intelligence like machine learning, although we haven't used it yet. It offers various methods, such as API management. You can easily access data files in formats like JSON or Excel, depending on your needs.
Choon Hwa Khoh - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to configure with no programming skills needed and helpful support
We primarily use the solution for content conversion and file transfers.  There are no programming skills needed. It's easy to configure.  The features are great. They have a lot of them. The solution can scale. It is stable and reliable. We have not had any issues. Technical support has been…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Logistics Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Integration Suite?
The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choos...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Integration Suite?
I'm not well-versed in the details of pricing and standard licensing for SAP Integration Suite as I primarily focus on technical aspects. As far as I know, clients can choose between different leve...
What needs improvement with SAP Integration Suite?
I believe there are areas where SAP Integration Suite could be improved, such as enhancing message transformation capabilities and simplifying conditional routing features compared to the on-premis...
What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I've heard that the solution is cheaper when compared to other products in the market.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Integration Suite vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.