Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs MuleSoft API Manager comparison

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. MuleSoft API Manager

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft API Manager

Ranking in API Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft API Manager is 4.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MuleSoft API Manager	4.4%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	94.0%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2081667

Associate Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized gateway has strengthened API security and provides deep traffic analytics

Potential areas of improvement or lack of functions in Axway AMPLIFY API Management is a challenging question because even after working for almost six years, I have not been able to touch everything this tool offers. This tool is very comprehensive and useful. However, from my opinion, when there are different dashboards on which the API platform shows monitoring, I expect Axway AMPLIFY API Management to be more visible in terms of showing pre-historic data. In other words, if there is a very large volume or very large number of transactions going on live in production, sometimes it purges the previous data very quickly, leaving only one or two hours of data. When there is very low volume, it can sustain data up to five days. The visibility of the previous historic database is a feature that could be improved. Different tools can be used to empower this capability, such as Splunk or the ELK stack, which includes Elastic. There are different features that could be used, but Axway as an organization would likely implement their specific products. I am simply providing a very basic opinion anonymously and do not want to sound like I am against this organization.

Read full review

D.Rajesh Kumar

Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Improved Integration Efficiency and Potential for Further Enhancements in Monitoring and User Experience

The policies in MuleSoft API Manager are significant features. We get the policies by default, with more than 25 out-of-the-box policies. If any additional requirement exists specific to the customer, there is a custom policy framework. We can build the policy according to our requirement, and deploy and enable it at the API Manager level to consume across different business groups, environments, or organizations altogether within the platform. Developing the custom policy is not challenging; you just need to follow the custom policy framework to implement. The custom policy and the different levels of SLAs of the API Manager are notable. Regarding the monitoring side of the API Manager, MuleSoft provides substantial monitoring with logs, offering search capability, raw data accessibility, and different subscriptions. With the top tier, integration with third-party platforms such as ELK or Splunk becomes unnecessary because all search capabilities, dashboards, and functional monitoring can be built within the platform itself. This is excellent from the monitoring perspective, and there have been recent improvements focusing on observability. For DevOps, if you want to make your continuous integration and continuous deployment effective, irrespective of the tool, there are options to integrate. For example, you can use the Maven plugin, platform APIs, or CLI to build your end-to-end DevOps cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

"It provides very strong security functionality to protect information in an easier way."

"Its flexibility allows us to adapt to different scenarios."

"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."

"The most useful features in Axway AMPLIFY API Management, in my opinion, primarily involve the security aspect of the product, which provides us very good methods of securing the network."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors."

"It provides various advantages in the integration field, including support for Azure services and cloud integrations."

"MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is a great solution. I like it very much because of its speed of delivery and because it allows API-led integration."

"Whenever there was an issue, the support was excellent."

"The most valuable features are API development and API management."

"I found the authentication features very valuable, like how the tool provides client IDs and secrets and lets you apply authentication policies. We bought the Titanium package with analytics, which allowed us to do rate limiting and throttling. The API monitoring and alerting were also useful."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the low code environment, the drag-and-drop functionality, and the ability to drop the connectors on the fly, which are extremely helpful."

"The most valuable feature of Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the gateway that is provided."

More MuleSoft API Manager pros

Cons

"The portal still has room for improvement."

"I think that the program's team management capabilities can be better as far as working in groups."

"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"Team management capabilities could be improved."

"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability."

"One improvement is maybe to add a plugin in the API manager. Let's say an organisation is using SOAP services or legacy APIs. Maybe I don't want to migrate it to rest API, but my plugin should be able to convert Jason to XML. Basically, protocol transformation features in API Manager."

"The pricing is quite expensive. It should be adjusted to make it more affordable for users."

"Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved."

"There are some loopholes in the security policies that could be improved."

"The API gateway and API runtime are too heavy, which means that it is not suitable for microservices."

"When compared to other integration technologies, it is slightly higher."

"When it comes to pricing, I find it always expensive. The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it, and their deployment strategy is also more costly due to containerization."

More MuleSoft API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"The pricing is very expensive, although you get a lot of power from the product."

"Our customers have a lot of concerns about the increased pricing. The customer feels MuleSoft is very costly, and they are also exploring other integration tools for a lesser price. Maybe we should retain the existing customers by offering some discounts. At least the existing customers can be retained this way. This is regarding the licensing part only because customers based out of North America and Europe have shown many concerns recently. They are a bit concerned about pricing."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"I think that it is pretty expensive."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as six and a half to seven."

"The product's main drawback is its cost. It's expensive for our company, and their recent change in pricing strategy last year complicated things further. That's the only thing we're not happy with."

"The licensing model is based on how many cores are used. It is a very simple licensing scheme."

"The solution looks more expensive on the surface because it builds all the functions into one core component or into an integrated suite of components."

More MuleSoft API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Regarding pricing for Axway AMPLIFY API Management, I cannot say definitively because it depends on the transactional volume expected by customers. I would not be able to give the final answer, but...

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

I am currently working on Axway AMPLIFY API Management, which is the Axway API platform. The main requirement for API management is that the API platform provides security to the different APIs whi...

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

When it comes to pricing, I find it always expensive. The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it, and their deployment strategy is also more...

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Apigee vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 12% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More MuleSoft API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

MuleSoft API Manager

Download MuleSoft API Manager product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

Anypoint API Manager

Overview

Axway AMPLIFY API Management offers secure and user-friendly API management solutions supporting flexible deployment options while ensuring robust security for data exchange and centralized management for developers.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management emphasizes strong security measures against threats, facilitating authenticated data exchange. Its centralized management tools enable efficient API analytics and portal usage. The platform's flexible deployment options, including on-premise and cloud solutions, are coupled with a user-friendly interface featuring drag-and-drop functionalities to streamline operations. However, improvements are needed in Amplify Central portal, customization features, and scalability options. While used primarily as an API gateway for internet, web, and REST APIs, companies leverage its features to create secure connections and integrate APIs internally and externally, fostering a comprehensive API ecosystem.

What are the key features of Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Security: Offers comprehensive protection against threats with authenticated data exchanges.
Centralized Management: Streamlines developer tasks with efficient API analytics and portal management.
Flexibility: Provides on-premise and cloud deployment options to suit operational needs.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies operations and enhances efficiency.
Governance and Policy Creation: Effective tools for managing policies and ensuring high performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Centralized tools streamline operations and improve management efficiency.
Scalability: Supports substantial data volumes efficiently despite needing improvements.
Security: Ensures secure and authenticated data exchanges for peace of mind.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates seamless connections with communication partners.
Hybrid-Cloud Capabilities: Leverages hybrid-cloud environments for a robust API ecosystem.

In the financial services industry, Axway AMPLIFY API Management is integral in creating secure marketplaces and ensuring reliable communication among partners. Its robust security and hybrid-cloud capabilities make it ideal for creating sophisticated API ecosystems, facilitating both internal and external integrations essential for modern operations.

Axway

MuleSoft API Manager offers a user-friendly platform with comprehensive integration capabilities, strong security, and scalable architecture. It's designed to streamline API management and development processes through robust analytics and a rich interface.

MuleSoft API Manager stands out with its lightweight design, offering extensive connector libraries and ease of applying policies via drag-and-drop functionality. Its robust analytics enhance operational efficiency. Users can implement custom policies, benefit from advanced integration needs like OAuth authentication, and manage extensive API inventories. While facing challenges like high costs and complex upgrades, MuleSoft API Manager is vital for managing APIs across sectors, supporting data exchange between systems such as SAP and Salesforce, and modernizing legacy systems.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft API Manager?

Lightweight Design: Ensures easy deployment and usability.
Robust API Management: Provides strong capability in handling API processes.
Strong Security: Offers extensive protection for API applications.
Scalable Architecture: Supports growth and adaptation to changing needs.
Comprehensive Integration Options: Facilitates seamless data exchange.
Extensive Library of Connectors: Enhances flexibility and connectivity.
Ease of Applying Policies: Simplifies management with intuitive drag-and-drop functions.
Robust Analytics: Aids in monitoring and operational efficiency.
Custom Policies: Supports advanced integration with OAuth authentication.

What benefits and ROI should reviewers consider?

Usability: Promotes ease of use for technical teams.
Integration Efficiency: Accelerates connections to essential systems.
Security: Ensures data integrity and protection.
Scalability: Provides potential for growing business needs.
Policy Management: Simplifies and enforces compliance across APIs.

MuleSoft API Manager is widely implemented in sectors seeking to integrate services like SAP and Salesforce quickly and securely. Its use in automating processes and enhancing API governance makes it a go-to API gateway. Organizations rely on it to modernize systems and manage interconnectivity, facilitating traffic control and robust policy management.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. MuleSoft API Manager