Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs CoreOS Clair comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Security category. Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1, while Red Hat is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in Container Security, compared to Red Hat’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

CoreOS Clair and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) compete in the container security and managed Kubernetes space. AKS has the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and user-reported value despite higher pricing.

Features: CoreOS Clair is known for detailed vulnerability scanning, robust threat detection, and security-focused tools. AKS offers seamless Azure integration, scalability, and comprehensive DevOps support.

Room for Improvement: CoreOS Clair needs better tool integration, more comprehensive reporting, and enhanced scalability. AKS could improve documentation, monitoring options, and simplify complex configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreOS Clair has a straightforward deployment but limited customer service. AKS has a more complex deployment process that requires expertise but provides extensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: CoreOS Clair offers competitive pricing with limited ROI for specialized functionality. AKS has higher setup costs but delivers favorable ROI through extensive features and ecosystem support.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Andrew W

VP - Information Technology at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues

Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.

Read full review

Raymond De Rooij

Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Scalability and flexibility but needs better support

We are using Azure Kubernetes Service as a customer. I cannot detail all the products and technologies we are using There isn't one specific feature of Azure Kubernetes Service that I can name as most valuable. It's part of a strategic solution yet I don't see an advantage compared to our…

Read full review

Felipe Giffu

Red Hat Solution Architect at Seprol Computadores e Sistemas

An operational system, similar to Linux where you can run your applications inside containers

With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers. When you mentioned using Nacula as part of your CI/CD pipeline, it means your application is deployed and managed automatically through the CI/CD process. Containers are used to deploy your application within this pipeline, but CoreOS does not run inside these containers. Instead, CoreOS is the base operating system that supports and manages these containers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Singularity Cloud Security offers autonomous response capabilities, automatically remediating threats and restoring affected files without manual intervention."

"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."

"Visibility is the most important aspect."

"I recommend SentinelOne due to its high-security capabilities, which are essential to safeguard data and systems from potential threats."

"Cloud Native Security's evidence-based reporting allows us to prioritize issues by understanding their impact, helping us resolve the most important problems first."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers several valuable features, most notably the rapid vulnerability notifications that provide timely alerts regarding our infrastructure."

"The most valuable features are automated threat response, AI detection, and static and dynamic detection."

"The most valuable aspects of PingSafe are its alerting system and the remediation guidance it provides."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"The product serves the purpose of helping streamline our company's application deployment and scaling processes."

"The most valuable features of AKS are scalability, deployability, and automation."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the diagnostic service."

"The most valuable features of Azure Kubernetes Service are its integration with Kubernetes, offering similar features for a seamless experience."

"AKS as a service is very good when you need to leverage applications or functions with much variability in their usage because you're trying to be as efficient as you can with resources."

"Containerization of the applications is the most valuable feature."

"The solution's technical support is excellent."

"I found the Helm deployment feature of the solution valuable."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pros

"With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers."

"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."

Cons

"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."

"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."

"The Singularity Cloud Security console is experiencing delays in clearing resolved issues, which can take over an hour to be removed from the display."

"The cloud-based operations might pose challenges in areas with limited or unavailable internet connectivity."

"I would like additional integrations."

"I would prefer to see SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM and CSPM."

"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."

"In version 2, a lot of rules have been deployed for Kubernetes security and CDR, which makes a lot of issues of critical severity, whereas they are not critical or of high severity. There is a mismatch of severities. They need to work on severity management."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"I am not impressed with the support services from Microsoft yet."

"We would like to see the addition of a service report from the server for this solution, so that we can monitor the health of server operations."

"The solution should improve its UI and cost."

"One area that could be improved is the Azure CLI. It would be beneficial if they could abstract some of the complexities related to deployment scripts and make them a part of Azure CLI."

"Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is more flexible but more complex to maintain."

"It can be tough to access the servers when onboarding."

"Its integration functions could be enhanced."

"I would like to see the stability get more synchronized."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cons

"It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue."

"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is costly."

"Pricing is based on modules, which was ideal for us."

"I am personally not taking care of the pricing part, but when we moved from CrowdStrike to PingSafe, there were some savings. The price of CrowdStrike was quite high. Compared to that, the price of PingSafe was low. PingSafe is charging based on the subscription model. If I want to add an AWS subscription, I need to pay more. It should not be based on subscription. It should be based on the number of servers that I am scanning."

"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's pricing is good."

"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."

"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."

"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"We are facing a significant challenge regarding OEM licensing. The issue arises from the fact that certain licenses required for our own purposes are not provided by Microsoft's licensing. Consequently, we are unsure about the most suitable mobile license provisioning model offered by third-party providers."

"As you scale your operations, AKS becomes more cost-effective."

"The product is expensive in terms of scalability."

"You pay for what you use."

"The pricing of the solution is same as Azure Stack."

"The solution does not cost much."

"It is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Azure Kubernetes Service offers a pay-as-you-go licensing model."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pricing and cost advice

"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

The documentation could be better. Besides improving the documentation, obtaining a professional or partner specializ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

One improvement I'd like to see is a better user interface for developers, enabling easier operation without relying ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

My primary use case is building and deploying solutions using multiple Azure services. I combine these services to bu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreOS Clair?

If you work with CoreOS or OpenShift, you don't need to pay for CoreOS separately. When you pay for OpenShift, you ge...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?

It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CoreOS Clair?

We use the tool to manage and secure the event file system. CoreOS Clair is an operational system that is very simila...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 25% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 19% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 77% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 4% of the time

SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 3% of the time

Orca Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors

JFrog Xray vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 31% of the time

Snyk vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 18% of the time

Trivy vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 15% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 14% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair

Compared 13% of the time

More CoreOS Clair Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

March 2025

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

April 2025

Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

April 2025

Download CoreOS Clair product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

No data available

Overview

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security protects cloud workloads, offering advanced threat detection and automated response. It integrates seamlessly with cloud environments and secures containerized applications and virtual machines against vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is renowned for its efficiency in mitigating threats in real-time. The platform integrates effortlessly with existing cloud environments, ensuring robust cloud security management with minimal manual intervention. Securing containerized applications and virtual machines, it excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection. However, improvements are needed in performance during high workload periods, and more integrations with third-party tools and better documentation would be beneficial. Users often find the installation process complex, support response times slow, and the dashboard's navigation unintuitive.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Real-time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats as they occur.
Automated Response: Automatically responds to threats to minimize impact.
Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with scalable options.
Machine Learning Insights: AI-driven insights enhance threat prevention.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with cloud environments for unified security management.

What are the primary benefits or ROI to expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Threat Mitigation: Improved security against real-time threats.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Automated processes save time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements.
Centralized Management: Manage security across platforms from a single console.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Provides in-depth analysis and protection.

In specific industries, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is implemented to safeguard critical data and infrastructure. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology depend on its real-time threat detection and automated response to protect sensitive information. Its ability to secure containerized applications and virtual machines is particularly valuable in dynamic environments where rapid scaling is necessary.

SentinelOne

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair

March 2025

Free Report: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. CoreOS Clair report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.