Azure Stack vs Google Anthos comparison

Microsoft and Google are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Google is ranked #10. Microsoft holds a 29.5% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Google’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Google users who would recommend it.

Azure Stack

Read 66 Azure Stack reviews

3,937 Views
2,797 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Google Anthos

Read 1 Google Anthos review

1,190 Views
495 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Azure Stack

Google Anthos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Google Anthos based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Nutanix and others in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Stack

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) (2nd)

Google Anthos

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Azure Stack is 29.5%, down from 31.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Anthos is 2.6%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

Sarath-Boppudi

Data Strategist, Cloud Solutions Architect at Strategic Architects

Seamless integration and impressive scaling capabilities for efficient architectural solutions

The scalability of Azure Stack is commendable. It can scale up within two to three minutes upon request. SQL Server is a good use case for data warehouses. It is scalable and can be set to serverless to reduce costs when not in use. Power BI Fabric offers a useful way to stack data in data warehousing solutions. Azure Stack provides federated authentication which is seamless with on-premise infrastructure, offering good performance and throughput. The integration with Microsoft's environment is also efficient.

Read full review

AlbertoPascoe

Independent consultant at Freelance

Quick time to market; great return on investment

Now everything is always changing and getting more performance and getting better and I think that, this is my sense of the answer, I mean, everything is working well, comparing with other products. I don't remember any kind of set down of course or something like that I can mention. That's my understanding, yeah. The Google Anthos business model could improve. As I understand, Google Anthos is not an internal part of the ecosystem. In fact, the Google sales effort and technical team are separated. In other words, the DCP was not voluntarily talking to the GCP. For example, if you need to talk to someone inside GCP about the connection or the integration with Anthos, the person who can help you is not in GCP. You would need to speak with someone inside Google. From the client perspective, this is not good. Overall, the management of the solution could be improved. The initial Google Anthos setup could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's not as complex compared to Amazon or AWS products. Azure Stack is easier to use within the cloud."

"Azure Stack is very stable."

"The product has remained stable so far in our company."

"The setup is very straightforward and it's quite stable."

"From my experience, this solution is suitable for enterprise companies."

"Azure Stack is like a hybrid model with a CI/CD pipeline. The IaaS and PaaS model works well with a hybrid type of connectivity."

"You can scale the solution if you need to."

"The best thing about this product is that it is user-friendly and intuitive."

More Azure Stack pros

"The Google Anthos feature I find the most valuable is the easy of use. In Google Anthos, you don't need to move along too many screens and so on. The interface is really helpful and understanding of the tool comes easily."

Cons

"The product needs to improve its pricing."

"Certain elements are difficult to deploy."

"I would only recommend this solution to smaller organizations like ours because I cannot really speculate what big issues that the bigger organizations will face."

"The challenge in Azure Stack begins at an individual level when you try to monitor every service from Azure Stack that gets consumed."

"The technical support team's response time needs improvement."

"Our only issue with Azure Stack so far is that the networking is very closed. You need to have the extended LAN to connect the internal LAN to the Azure Stack. Any connection we have needs site-to-site VPN connectivity instead of an internal connection, so Azure Stack has room for improvement in the networking area."

"Azure Messaging services are in need of improvement."

"For some years, Azure has been working on Synapse. It's their big footprint on the analytics stack. It's a little bit heavy right now in the sense that there are too many components and it's too complex."

More Azure Stack cons

"The initial Google Anthos setup is not easy. Nothing is truly easy in the Google Anthos world."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing could be improved so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Subscription model customers need not make large expenditures on upfront purchasing."

"The pricing is excellent with several options to save you time and money."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is expensive, but it is fine for the value that the solution produces."

"The tool is affordable."

"Price-wise, AWS might be relatively cheaper compared to Azure, but the deployment on Azure is much easier."

"Azure Stack's price falls on the higher side of the spectrum. The licensing costs for Azure Stack in our region range somewhere between 40,000 to 50,000 USD."

More Azure Stack pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Stack?

For hybrid cloud operations, the seamless transition it enables is key. Most enterprises have a lot of workloads on-premises, and they want a smooth way to move into the cloud. Some things are on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stack?

Azure Stack pricing is generally reasonable, though it has been getting expensive recently due to inflation and changes in Microsoft’s charging strategy to US dollar-based billing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Stack?

More integration with AI capabilities would be beneficial, along with improvements in monitoring and cost management. Reducing costs slightly would also be desirable.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Azure Stack

Compared 46% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Azure Stack

Compared 31% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Azure Stack

Compared 14% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Azure Stack

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Software Defined Data Center vs Azure Stack

Compared 1% of the time

More Azure Stack Competitors

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Google Anthos

Compared 33% of the time

AWS Outposts vs Google Anthos

Compared 26% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Google Anthos

Compared 23% of the time

More Google Anthos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Stack

March 2025

Download Azure Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

February 2025

Download Google Anthos product report

Overview

Information not available

Microsoft

Anthos lets you build and manage modern hybrid applications on existing on-premises investments or in the public cloud. Built on open source technologies pioneered by Google - including Kubernetes, Istio, and Knative - Anthos enables consistency between on-premises and cloud environments. Anthos helps accelerate application development and strategically enable your business with transformational technologies like service mesh, containers, and microservices.

Google

Sample Customers

Weblink, Fathym, Sage, CFD Support Ltd, The UberCloud Inc.

HSBC, Target, 20th Century Fox, Twitter, American Cancer Society, PayPal, Bloomberg, Nielsen, McKesson

Buyer's Guide

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Nutanix and others in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.