

Azure Stack and VMware Cloud Foundation are competing products in the cloud solutions market. Users have expressed a preference for Azure Stack's pricing and support, citing its integration capabilities and user-friendly model. However, VMware Cloud Foundation is seen as superior in terms of features and functionality.
Features: Azure Stack is favored for its versatility, ease of use, and integration capabilities. It has comprehensive security features and simplifies application deployment, integrating well with Microsoft tools and complying with IT governance standards. VMware Cloud Foundation excels with complete data center capabilities, life cycle management, and advanced automation, offering robust virtualization solutions through a single network, and allowing extensive customization and management across various environments.
Room for Improvement: Azure Stack could improve third-party integration and pricing, and faces challenges with setup complexity and database management. Users suggest enhancements in monitoring tools and support for Azure's existing services. VMware Cloud Foundation could benefit from better integration and pricing flexibility, as well as easier upgrades. Complicated deployment processes and licensing costs also need attention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Stack provides a user-friendly deployment experience with strong integration capabilities but receives mixed feedback on customer service response times and support depth. VMware Cloud Foundation offers straightforward deployment but its technical support sometimes lacks in detailed problem resolution due to complex integration issues. Azure Stack is noted for faster deployment within Microsoft's ecosystem, whereas VMware's deployment is comprehensive but complex.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Stack's pricing is considered reasonable with flexible pay-as-you-go options and affordable upfront costs. Despite being seen as expensive compared to some options, it offers clear value through its features and licensing flexibility. VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive, yet it effectively reduces costs compared to direct competitors, offering an all-in-one solution. Both platforms highlight positive ROI, with Azure Stack providing quick gains due to low initial costs and VMware delivering savings through efficient infrastructure management.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows cost and time savings by quickly deploying infrastructure requests and integrating automatic ticketing and backup services.
In terms of ROI, although VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive, it saves time in most cases, which indirectly saves costs for users.
The technicians handling the tickets do not seem very technical.
Any support we receive is through Dell EMC, as that's a policy from Microsoft itself.
It is okay; overall it is good without room for improvement when it comes to response time or first-level support quality.
There are times when support is unclear, and even VMware support personnel may lack familiarity with certain parts, causing difficulties.
Based on my nine years of experience with VMware, I would evaluate their technical support as effective.
The technical support from VMware Cloud Foundation deserves a nine out of ten rating.
Monitoring, changing plans, and consolidating things are necessary parts of the process to avoid excessive costs.
Our company seeks cost-effective and more flexible open systems, and we find it difficult to integrate with third-party hardware.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Azure Stack as eight.
When more hosts are added, performance goes slow.
VMware Cloud Foundation supports scalability and company growth.
VMware Cloud Foundation is quite scalable, receiving a rating of eight and a half to nine out of ten.
The stability of VMware Cloud Foundation is very high.
If one component fails to operate in a timely manner, the entire infrastructure can go down because everything is interconnected.
I am currently satisfied with the stability of VMware Cloud Foundation, though having started only two to three months ago, I am still in the monitoring phase.
The precision of anonymous activity tracking should be improved, particularly in identifying the correct location because IP information is sometimes inaccurate.
Many resources get created in Azure Stack, and managing those resources can be challenging.
Management looks for a balanced product that utilizes existing hardware, fulfills external customer demand, and leverages the scalability of the cloud model.
VMware Broadcom needs to include auto resource allocation at the VM levels.
The maintenance cost has increased significantly, especially after Broadcom acquired VMware, with a shift from socket-based licensing to core-based licensing.
Each user needs deep knowledge of every aspect of virtualization.
If Microsoft lowers the price, more small businesses would be able to adopt the Enterprise E5 license.
The cost has become very high, especially after Broadcom's acquisition, altering the licensing model to a more expensive core-based system.
When comparing prices of both clouds, AWS is cheaper because they offer a free section for practice.
The price is quite higher than some other vendors.
They allow me to track all user activities.
I am very much impressed with Azure Stack, especially regarding security, complete compliance, data sovereignty, and data security.
It has benefited my organization as it is implemented according to the standards, including GDPR and all, so it works.
The solution now offers auto-deployment of VMs.
All features of VMware Cloud Foundation are valuable to us, as it covers every industry standard protocol and requirement protocol.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows for extensive customization, aligning with our customer requirements.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Stack | 17.4% |
| VMware Cloud Foundation | 17.9% |
| Other | 64.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.