We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When we engage Azure Stack, it's very easy to lift and shift. That's why we've been successful because we can be clear and fast in understanding workflows from the customer."
"The solution pairs well with other MS services and saves us a lot of money."
"The solution is pretty stable."
"The solution is easy to use, especially for individuals who are not familiar with coding and has security built-in."
"It's a good and cost effective solution for any organization. We can deploy the tech solution on premises and also in the cloud."
"Azure Stack is very stable."
"The product has remained stable so far in our company."
"The solution's technical support is great since, in our company, we get answers to most of our questions, and most of our queries get resolved with the help of the documentation itself."
"The solution can scale well."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The scalability is good."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"PaaS is not ready because they are only offering MS SQL as a service, web applications as a service, and containers as a service."
"From a security perspective, there are certain things which could be improved."
"It does not give you a complete, production-ready setup."
"Azure Stack needs to improve integrations."
"Azure Stack is relatively new and lacks the features compared to public Azure."
"It would be better to have more services and functionality when it comes to database software and computing."
"There are limits to the bandwidth and sizing of the images."
"The fact that it is completely integrated into Azure, while positive, is also a downside."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"The pricing can be better."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 61 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 5th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 9 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Google Anthos and VMware Software Defined Data Center, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Azure Stack vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.