Bacula Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Backup comparison

Bacula Systems and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0, while NetApp is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. Bacula Systems holds a 2.1% mindshare in CB, compared to NetApp’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

1,370 Views
1,155 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Backup

Read 4 NetApp Cloud Backup reviews

378 Views
322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

NetApp Cloud Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and NetApp Cloud Backup are prominent data backup solutions. Bacula Enterprise stands out in cost efficiency and support, while NetApp Cloud Backup is notable for its extensive features, making it worth the price for many users.

Features: Bacula Enterprise is praised for its scalability, robust deduplication, and extensive compatibility with multiple operating systems. NetApp Cloud Backup is valued for its seamless integration with native cloud services, highly detailed reporting, and efficient snapshot capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise users suggest enhancements in documentation and user training resources. NetApp Cloud Backup users often point to occasional performance issues under certain loads and suggest more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise is appreciated for its flexible deployment options, although some find initial setup complex. Customer service receives positive feedback for swift and effective responses. NetApp Cloud Backup is recognized for straightforward cloud integration and deployment, but its customer service gets mixed reviews regarding response times.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise is often highlighted for lower initial setup costs and a strong ROI due to customizable pricing. NetApp Cloud Backup users report higher upfront costs, justified by its feature-rich platform and long-term ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

26th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

27th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (10th), Disk Based Backup Systems (4th), Cloud Storage Gateways (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Backup is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Jul 26, 2022

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

We use the solution as a complete backup solution for virtual machines and databases in Prodap - Data Processing in Amapá. Its very lean and simple architecture, with its deduplications not covering our network, made our traffic around 60% lighter. We also like the efficiency of data compression…

Read full review

Abbasi Poonawala

Chief Enterprise Architect at Bank in KSA/JPMORGAN

Feb 22, 2021

Simplifies our backups with an agentless backup manager, but needs better integration with in-house applications

One area that can be improved is around how we define the different KPIs. In particular, the business KPIs. I have my own in-house application for the business KPIs, so for example, with our policies around retention, which is a period of seven years, I have to read these parameters from other applications and I need them to integrate well. NetApp Cloud Backup Manager should help to get this integrated seamlessly with other applications, meaning that it will populate the data around the different parameters. These parameters could be things like the retention period, the backup schedule, or anything. It might be an ITSM ticket, where it's a workflow that is triggered somewhere, and the ITSM ticket has been created for a particular environment like my development environment, an INT environment, or a UAT environment. This kind of process needs to integrate well with my own application, and there are some challenges. For example, if it allows for consuming of RESTful APIs, that's how we will usually integrate, but there are certain challenges when it comes to integrating with our own application around KPIs, whether it's business KPIs or technical KPIs. What I want is to populate that data from my own applications. So we have have the headroom in the KPI, and we have the throughput, the volumes, the transactions per second, etc., which are all defined. And these are the global parameters. They affect all the lines of business. It's a central application that is consumed by most of the lines of business and it's all around the KPIs. Earlier, it used to be based on Quest Foglight, which is an application that was taken up and customized. It was made in-house as a core service, and used as a core building block. But our use of Quest Foglight has become a bit outdated. There is no more support available, and it's been there as a kind of legacy application for more than ten years now in the organization. And now it get down to the question: Is this an investment or will we need to divest ourselves of it? So there has to be an option to remediate it out. In that case, one possibility is to integrate the existing application and it gets completely decommissioned. Here it would help if there were some better ways of defining or handling the KPIs in the Cloud Manager, so that most of the parameters are not defined directly by me. Those will be the global parameters that are defined across all the lines of business. There are some integration challenges when it comes to this, and I've spoken to the support team who say they have the REST APIs, but the integration still isn't going as smooth as it could be. Most of the time, when things aren't working out, we need dedicated engineers to be put in for the entire integration. And then it becomes more of a challenge on top of everything. So if the Cloud Manager isn't being fed all the kinds of parameters from the backup strategy around the ITSM and incident tickets, or backup schedules, or anything related to the backup policies, then it takes a while. Ideally, I would want it to be read directly from our in-house applications. And this is more to do with our kind of product processes; that is, it's not our own choice to decide. The risk management team has mandated this as part of the compliance, that we have to strictly enforce the KPIs, the headroom, and the rest of the global parameters which are defined for the different lines of business. So if my retention period changes from seven years to, let's say, 10 years or 15 years, then those rules have to be strictly enforced. Ultimately, we would like better support for ITSM. The ITSM tools like ServiceNow or BMC Remedy are already adding multiple new features, so they have to be upgraded over a period of time, and that means NetApp has to provision for that and factor it in. Some of the AI-based capabilities are there now, and those things have to be incorporated somehow. One last thing is that NetApp could provide better flash storage. Since they're already on block storage and are doing well in that segment, it makes sense that they will have to step up when it comes to flash array storage and so on. I have been evaluating NetApp's flash array storage solutions versus some others like Toshiba's flash array and Fujitsu's storage array, which are quite cost-effective.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"Scalability is very good."

"One feature that works well for us is that the Cloud Manager is a completely agentless solution. There's a similar dashboard on both the versions for on-premises and the cloud, and with reference to the Cloud Manager, it's a little faster because there's nothing to be installed as such. Being agentless, it doesn't require any agent to be deployed on the targets where the backups are triggered."

"NetApp Cloud Backup performance is good and they have beneficial technology."

"I rate the scalability a ten out of ten...It has a great impact on our business because we have the infrastructure deployed globally on four continents around the world."

Cons

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"NetApp has a nasty way of dealing with the license for the product's on-premises virtual NetApp appliance that you need in your whole architecture, and it is not directly linked to NetApp Cloud Backup."

"Integration and reporting could be improved."

"One area that can be improved is around how we define the different KPIs. In particular, the business KPIs. I have my own in-house application for the business KPIs, so for example, with our policies around retention, which is a period of seven years, I have to read these parameters from other applications and I need them to integrate well."

"NetApp Cloud Backup could improve by being easier to use. Veeam solution is easier to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually."

"If one is not cost-effective and ten is a highly cost-effective product, I rate the tool as a three. The tool is not so cheap."

"Our usage depends on the number of licenses we have. On the cloud, it's a pay-to-use kind of model which suits our needs well. Once we have the Cloud Manager installed, the licensing process is okay, regardless of whether we're running backups in the cloud or on-premises. Sometimes, we have to restrict the number of users as per the contractual agreement and in this case we simply cut down on the licensing."

"Cost could be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What's the 3-2-1 data protection that NetApp Cloud Backup offers?

Hi, the 3-2-1 data protection from this product is related to a backup strategy with the same name. I'm assuming you don't know about it so I'll tell you in a few words. In its essence, this backup...

See all answers

Is NetApp Cloud Backup secure for backup?

I've just started using NetApp Cloud Backup but my initial reason behind choosing it in the first place is that they advertise their high-security approach. So basically, they give you ransomware p...

See all answers

Is NetApp Cloud Backup expensive in your opinion?

It depends on how much exactly you count as expensive. For me, NetApp Cloud Backup isn't too expensive. I say that based on the services it provides and on the way it provides them. I think it's im...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 60% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs NetApp Cloud Backup

Compared 63% of the time

Dell NetWorker vs NetApp Cloud Backup

Compared 38% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2024

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

October 2024

Download NetApp Cloud Backup product report

Learn More

Bacula Systems

Video not available

NetApp

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

NetApp Cloud Backup is a fully integrated service for cloud backup and restoration. It was created to comply fully with NetApp's native data management software ONTAP, used for hybrid cloud experience. NetApp Cloud Backup is used to create backup and restoration for the protection and archiving of data, databases, and virtual machines related to the Cloud and On-Premises data in ONTAP. The way NetApp Cloud Backup works is by automatically creating block-level incremental backups. This ensures that the created backups are very fast and easy to restore. It is suitable for data protection regarding on-premises software as well as in the public cloud. NetApp Cloud Backup provides users with the ability to protect their cloud data at affordable prices and with a user-friendly interface so they don't need a lot of technical knowledge to be able to secure their cloud storage.

The copies created by NetApp Cloud Backup can be stored in the user's personal object storage in the cloud as well as on premises with StorageGRID - NetApp's storage platform. The backup copies can be restored to the original source or to a different source in Cloud Volumes ONTAP. NetApp Cloud Backup provides backups to AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

NetApp Cloud Backup Features

The features NetApp Cloud Backup provides include:

Data recovery: NetApp Cloud Backup provides restoration of individual files as well as full volume recovery, based on the user's needs. The data can be retrieved from a specific point in time, giving clients even more assurance that their cloud-stored data can and will be saved.
Indexed catalog: Another feature that NetApp Cloud Backup offers is a search catalog, providing multiple search criteria and the ability to locate a file across all backups.
Various archival tiers: This feature provides the ability for multi-cloud support, including top services like Google Cloud Storage Archive, Glacier Deep Archive, Amazon S3 Glacier, and Azure Archive Storage.
Encryption: End-to-end encryption allows users to feel more secure about their data.
Cloud technology features: Additional features regarding cloud technology include the options for movement from CAPEX to OPEX and mixing BYOL and PAYGO.

NetApp Cloud Backup Benefits

In addition to enhanced security and protection from malicious attacks, the advantages of using NetApp Cloud Backup include:

Aligns with the 3-2-1 backup strategy
Various levels of protection of data, including encryption and full customer control
Protection against ransomware, using different security methods
A wide variety of supported workloads, including databases, VMs, applications, NAS, and K8s

Reviews from Real Users

Abbasi P., a User at a financial services firm, likes that NetApp Cloud Backup is a completely agentless solution.

A Service Manager at a tech services company values its stability, scalability, and good technical support.

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup

October 2024

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Backup report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.