Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Balbix BreachControl vs Nucleus comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
32nd
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (4th)
Balbix BreachControl
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
55th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (14th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (21st), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (8th)
Nucleus
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
50th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (38th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini - PeerSpot reviewer
Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions
I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.
Use Balbix BreachControl?
Share your opinion
Use Nucleus?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
University
6%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?
Pricing for Zafran Security is not expensive. We have a contract for five years, and the cost is lower than other too...
What needs improvement with Zafran Security?
I would like to see an integration with Check Point firewalls. It's essential for us and they are currently working o...
What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?
We use Zafran Security for threat prioritization. We establish priority to understand which risks should be patched o...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
BreachControl
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cavium
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: February 2025.
842,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.