Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup vs Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Ba...
Ranking in Cloud Backup
22nd
Ranking in SaaS Backup
11th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365
Ranking in Cloud Backup
6th
Ranking in SaaS Backup
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 is 6.3%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

Johan Camp - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, easy to set up, and offers good pricing
In the future, we are looking for solutions combining both local and cloud backup from a single management platform that was initially not yet available. There were two different platforms at Barracuda. What would be great should be either a guaranteed restore or a guaranteed restoring speed. It's difficult as they rely on Azure too. However, that would be convenient from a user perspective.
MehmetAksoy - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable rollback features for smooth IT operations and an easy setup
We are using Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 to take backups of shop floor PCs. I use it for clients locally, particularly for critical machines. It is also used globally for server-side backups and includes scheduling features like taking ten backups every Sunday when the factory is closed. This…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is deployable anywhere. It is also scalable and reliable."
"The initial setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable feature of Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is it's synchronized well with Microsoft 365. Additionally, the solution is able to identify through Microsoft Defender if there are viruses and will provide a notification."
"The product enables us to restore lost files."
"The product's most valuable feature is the backup retention policy."
"The most valuable feature is the AI with threat detection that can detect ransomware and restore it."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up not only to the cloud but also to your local environment so a copy of your data can be kept on-prem."
"The solution is stable."
"Its absolute functionality and intuitiveness are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the scalability and the free license of up to ten VMs."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Veeam makes modular solutions, so you can install Veeam Backup for Office 365 and Veeam Backup and Replication in one single server. You can do an all in one installation, and roll it out."
"The solution helps reduce our workload."
"It is a stable solution."
 

Cons

"The tool does not support Google Support. I have only Microsoft 365 customers. I don't have a good solution for my G-suite customers."
"They should adapt to new parameters as the market grows."
"We needed assistance with the implementation of the solution from the vendor. The process could be easier."
"What would be great should be either a guaranteed restore or a guaranteed restoring speed."
"The solution may be improved by allowing integration with other platforms."
"Locating and recovering files can be confusing."
"Microsoft currently saves only two months of conversation history, and it would be better if Veeam could focus on backing up more than two months of conversation data."
"The license pricing can be reduced."
"I'm very satisfied with Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and would continue using it if it were up to me. However, my management is considering alternative solutions due to issues with our storage solutions."
"Veeam Backup for Office 365 can improve by reducing the time it takes for backups. I have mentioned this to Veeam and hopefully, in the next version, it will be a faster backup."
"The customer service and support response time can be improved."
"You can't really edit. For example, if you have created a backup for a user, you can't drill down on a granular level during the backup. You have to back up the mailbox completely. That's it. It would be helpful if you could at least go inside the mailboxes to choose what you want."
"While I don't have a use case in mind, it would be great if they could integrate more automation capabilities into the solution."
"They need more documentation, awareness, and assistance."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable compared to other products."
"The product's pricing is fair and competitive."
"This is a cost-effective solution."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The product's pricing is based on the customer's needs because every customer is different."
"We are talking about a third party solution, so there is a licensing fee."
"The solution is not expensive."
"It is an expensive product, and there is an additional cost involved in purchasing hardware. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
"We decided on Altaro because, from the point of view of the total cost, Altaro looks cheaper than Veeam. Veeam has a lot of costs that are not clear when you start it, which makes it less flexible than Altaro, but only after half a year, you can be really sure that you made a good decision."
"Veeam Backup for Office 365 is a subscription-based solution."
"The pricing model makes this solution more expensive than it needs to be."
"We have 2000 users and pay about $10,000. It may be a little bit more per year. We have an education institute and may have fewer expenses."
"The pricing is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
24%
Legal Firm
8%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
The price is reasonable compared to other products. Veeam cost us GBP 7000. Barracuda costs us GBP 1500 per year.
What needs improvement with Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
The solution has its flaws. Locating and recovering files can be confusing. It takes us a little bit of time to find the file we're looking for.
How does AvePoint Cloud Backup compare with Veeam Backup for Office 365?
AvePoint Cloud Backup for MS Office 365 is a SaaS backup whose features include secure storage and unlimited and automated backups. The storage is saved in AvePoint’s Azure storage or it can also b...
What do you like most about Veeam Backup for Office 365?
The tool is easy to use and straightforward regarding restoration and creating backups. It's user-friendly, providing results and sending alerts when something goes wrong.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veeam Backup for Office 365?
The initial cost can be high as IT solutions are generally expensive, however, the solution is worth it due to its functionality and reliability. I would recommend revisiting the pricing structure,...
 

Also Known As

Barracuda Cloud to Cloud Backup
Veeam Backup for Office 365, Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Delta Dental Plans Association
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup vs. Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.