Basecamp vs Wrike comparison

Read 59 Wrike reviews

3,613 Views
2,135 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Basecamp

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Basecamp and Wrike based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Basecamp vs. Wrike Report (Updated: October 2024).

Download the complete report

Basecamp vs. Wrike

October 2024

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Basecamp

Ranking in Project Management Software

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wrike

Ranking in Project Management Software

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Basecamp is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 5.5%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Abenazzer Tadesse

Chief Operations Officer at BeOnline ICT

An easy-to-use project management solution with good stability and scalability

The recent update on the solution has made it a little bit complex. For example, to create a team and a project, there is a separate button that you need to click. Recently they updated it with only one button making it difficult for us to create teams or supply teams other than a project. Hence the solution could be more user-friendly. Additionally, some additional features need to be integrated so it'll be easy for other companies or project managers to manage software projects.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to network informally is great for communicating with colleagues."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly."

"Visibility and organization are the most valuable features of Wrike."

"We can easily write down the tasks and reorganize them as well as have a progression index. Wrike offers several views including a kanban view and Gantt chart view."

"We utilize time tracking and reports most often."

"In our company, we heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, managing all sorts of projects and tasks, and having a history of all our correspondence items."

"This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"The product isn't easy to use. It's not very intuitive."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website."

"Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features."

"What annoys me with Wrike and things that I would like to improve is that you need to have a very organized workflow that everyone in the company follows, and only then will Wrike work."

"This solution could be improved if we were able to better analyze how the application consumes cloud resources as this can cause a delay in performance."

"We feel that the actual project reports and roll-ups could be a lot different. We are seeking something more for the dashboard. We would like a high-level dashboard that can be broken down into individual product roll-ups and tasks that are assigned. If you assign someone to a task, it assigns them all of the tasks under that. We want to be able to break those down so that a person doesn't have an 800 task list, for example. We want more separation with that and a higher-level dashboard experience."

"We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version."

"It would be great if they could develop more reporting."

"The product needs to send direct emails to customers updating the latest aspects since it is better to hear directly."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

"Wrike is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user203955

Managing Director with 51-200 employees

Feb 25, 2015

Podio vs. Wrike vs. LiquidPlanner

Having outgrown the features of our trusted project management software, we began to explore options to allow for the sustained growth of SIX AD. Taking Stock Having identified that Basecamp no longer met our needs as a practice, we began a process of defining what we needed from our project…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

86%

University

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Basecamp?

The ease of use is valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Basecamp?

The licensing costs are approximately $900 annually. I rate the price a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.

What needs improvement with Basecamp?

What do you like most about Wrike?

The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality.

What needs improvement with Wrike?

What is your primary use case for Wrike?

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Wrike

Comparisons

No data available

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 26% of the time

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 25% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Wrike

Compared 13% of the time

Trello vs Wrike

Compared 11% of the time

Compared 8% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Project Management Software

November 2024

Download Basecamp product report

Download Wrike product report

October 2024

Learn More

Basecamp

Overview

Basecamp is a web-based project-management tool developed by Basecamp and launched in 2004, with a new version being launched in 2012. Basecamp offers to-do lists, wiki-style web-based text documents, milestone management, file sharing, time tracking, and a messaging system. Basecamp Classic also offers integration with Basecamp's own Campfire product, and features APIs that are used by a host of web and mobile apps. Basecamp Classic's interface is available in different languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian, German, Finnish and Japanese). The newer version of Basecamp currently only supports English as the interface language.

Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:

Data silos: Tasks, discussions and documents scattered across email, Skype, personal computers and spreadsheets
Poor visibility into work status
Missed deadlines and project failures

Main benefits:

Accelerating project delivery by using a platform your team will actually use and love
Keeping all team members on the same page even across borders without lengthy status meetings, long email threads and spreadsheet updates
Big picture of project progress with real-time updates and cross-project reports and newsfeed
Real-time team collaboration with discussions, files attached to tasks, and a built-in document editor

Why Wrike?

Wrike is a system your team will use. It helps them do their work, not just track it.
Wrike can be easily customized to your needs as each team can set up their own workflow.
Wrike scales as you grow, providing visibility and ease of use for teams of any size.

Sample Customers

Ashland Addison Florist Co., Victory Auto Wreckers, Ideal Box Co., Hollymatic Corp.

Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic